Junky is an alternative spelling.

>>13622412

from:

https://grammarist.com/spelling/junkie-junky/

"Junkie vs. junky

Junkie is a noun. It refers to (1) someone who is addicted to narcotics, and (2) one who has an insatiable interest in something. In reference to drug addicts, it’s disparaging and might be considered insensitive. Junky is an adjective. It means (1) worthy of being discarded, and (2) meaningless or unbelievable. Some dictionaries list junky as an alternative spelling of junkie in the sense synonymous with addict, but the words are usually kept separate in edited writing."

Censorship is

Erasicism

>>13622464

false

>>13622457

I remember

May 11, 2019 as an important day.

it was a 'banner day', a day to be remembered.

>>13622501

go elsewhere for your education you will only get a tainted view here on that.

it's too touchy a subject.

cute to pretend huh, I simply don't believe you but I'll give you the benifit of the doubt.

>>13622528

you prove you are a false thing.

liar

>>13622536

bullshit.

the statement 'silence is consent' is a lie.

>>13622605

no, he does not say it is consent.

fail

>>13622729

wow you've gone off the deep end.

everyone you disagree with is a war criminal?

>>13622675

I hope you get arrested for it if it's true and not you larping.

>>13622778

everyone you disagree with should go to the gulag?

>>13622789

you're tredding on very very thin ice.

you need to dispose of the rest of it in a way that no one else can use it.

the level of your . . . infraction is rather huge but . . . being high, you just don't understand.

repent or . . . well I have no idea because I wouldn't never think of using something knowingly with that kind of an origin.

if you aren't just a larper.

>>13622806

you really think you're anonymous here?

not everyone is rathional when dealing with those who promote abomination.

California is known for it's vigilantees.

you should watch your back

>>13622815

if you read it it makes perfect sense. He claims you're a shill and that Brok or someone is paying you and he sarcastically says if you are getting paid, it being Mom's day that you should get paid more.

you couldn't understand that?

>>13622819

>(You)

non sequitor?

I have no idea where that comes from.

I assume it's the typical shill bot nonsequitor that the shill bots do now.

like a bland statement that gets repeated from bread to bread to try and change the subject.

I've noticed it in the last few weeks.

is it a sign of the desparation of those who know that htye do not have a rethorical leg to stand on? They veer off topic and then attack if you comment on their newer fallacy (which is the distraction)

>>13622923

don't put down adoption parents, anon.

It's very disrespectful.