Anonymous ID: 8dec80 May 9, 2021, 6:09 p.m. No.13624062   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Origin of Covid — Following the Clues

Did people or nature open Pandora’s box at Wuhan?

 

“The virus that caused the pandemic is known officially as SARS-CoV-2, but can be called SARS2 for short.”

 

~~https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-the-clues-6f03564c038~~

Anonymous ID: 8dec80 May 9, 2021, 6:29 p.m. No.13624204   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4238 >>4260 >>4297 >>4443 >>4587 >>4618

Fauci culpability for COVID-19 (SARS2)

 

https://nicholaswade.medium.com/origin-of-covid-following-the-clues-6f03564c038

 

>The moratorium specifically barred funding any gain-of-function research that increased the pathogenicity of the flu, MERS or SARS viruses. But then a footnote on p.2 of the moratorium document states that “An exception from the research pause may be obtained if the head of the USG funding agency determines that the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.”

 

>This seems to mean that either the director of the NIAID, Dr. Anthony Fauci, or the director of the NIH, Dr. Francis Collins, or maybe both, would have invoked the footnote in order to keep the money flowing to Dr. Shi’s gain-of-function research.

 

>“Unfortunately, the NIAID Director and the NIH Director exploited this loophole to issue exemptions to projects subject to the Pause –preposterously asserting the exempted research was ‘urgently necessary to protect public health or national security’ — thereby nullifying the Pause,” Dr. Richard Ebright said in an interview with Independent Science News.

 

>When the moratorium was ended in 2017 it didn’t just vanish but was replaced by a reporting system, the Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight (P3CO) Framework, which required agencies to report for review any dangerous gain-of-function work they wished to fund.

According to Dr. Ebright, both Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci “have declined to flag and forward proposals for risk-benefit review, thereby nullifying the P3CO Framework.”

 

>In his view, the two officials, in dealing with the moratorium and the ensuing reporting system, “have systematically thwarted efforts by the White House, the Congress, scientists, and science policy specialists to regulate GoF [gain-of-function] research of concern.”