tyb
I just responded with the same link, then went back to check it out.
Holy shit, and here I thought we had a shill spamming problem.
>If a [criminal] instigates a fire as a distraction from the true crime, it is an FF event.
No, that's not what a False Flag event is. The above is two separate crimes, but they
don't tie back to an opposing party.
>the real [polls] are his White House feed with thumbs down.
Almost every video is at least 8 to 1 down votes.
>>>If a [criminal] instigates a fire as a distraction from the true crime, it is an FF event.
>>No, that's not what a False Flag event is. The above is two separate crimes, but they
>>don't tie back to an opposing party.
>Sorry your imagination has such shitty script writers. I think you do not fully comprehend the statement as it anon meant.
Maybe it's because English is my native language, but I understand the plain meaning of words.
A "False Flag" event means that one party commits an act to be blamed on another (think of the
Antifa/John Sullivan crowd at the Capitol building). The shooting could be an MKUltra-type
hoax, but it's not being blamed on another actor (yet).
>A false flag is a real or fake crime with the intention of promoting an agenda.
I'd peg that as a hoax, since there's not an overt 'flag' to be planted, but I understand
where you're coming from, and I'm not wildly opposed to it. I'll go with it, anon.
>To be clearer… a False Flag is more accurately described as a crime, real OR fake, falsely attributed to someone or group that did not do it.
^^^^^^^^
THIS
Again, before I filter your spammy ass, let me make a suggestion; give us the actual
documentation that Solzhenitsyn used, reference his book, page numbers, etc,…
See ya next bread.
>Takes a 9mm to the neck at close range and not a single drop of blood anywhere.
In the video I saw it looked like the shooter was aiming at her torso.
As you say, a neck shot with no splatter and no bullet hole in the wall behind.
Blood doesn't appear until one of the 'comrades' comes to check her out.
Alarm bells.
>Almost every USA male has the procedure; It's more than just something Jews do.
I think that's GenitalMutilationAnon's point, that it's become normalized to perform that procedure
even when it's not medically necessary, and it's spread beyond the Jewish community.
> I am able to perceive the difference between me and those who are.
How do you know how it feels to be circumcised? Reel it in, GManon.
>the psychological damage is immense
This is an exercise in epistemology, now; HOW do you know the psychological damage
another circumcised male is suffering from?
>“Foreskin Wars”
Kek! I've watched GManon for some time, but this is the first bread I've ever actually
engaged in the discussion about it. At least we got the FF issue out of the way.
>understanding reality
Humans, whether circumcised or not, have and will continue to hurt, torture, and murder other human beings.
I'm in general agreement that it is a barbaric procedure, it should be opposed, and there may be underlying
trauma associated with the procedure, but you're not addressing my epistemic query.
How do you know what it feels like to be circumcised?
>>How do you know what it feels like to be circumcised?
>they way if feels is that I do not believe that 'humans have or will continue to hurt, torture, and murder other human begins'.
>do you understand now?
The typos don't help, for starters, and secondly it's an observable fact of human nature that people kill each other,
circumcised or not. It's been an interesting bread engaging the topic, but it's falling apart quickly.