>>13634380 (pb)
shills using the same talking points are anons?
this is the shill world view: they post as two separate IDs and that , to them, says 'anons agree'
https://www.bostonherald.com/2021/05/10/robbins-abe-foxman-keeps-up-fight-against-anti-semitism
the commentator discussing how heroic the support of censorship is by the well conected bigots of the ADL
wow the team must be doing other things.
I leave a bait post and 3 minutes later they don't even respond.
wow it took you 11 minutes.
no, I'm not paid by the you.
just trying to figure out what has the shill team distracted today.
It breaks my heart that the big strong guy from the ADL is a fascist.
He's so handsome and charming.
you gave yourself a you.
so you agree that censor ship, as long as it protects your interests, IS ok even though it's mostly illegal?
the people who defame Jews are those who pretend that the censorship is OK against any kind of discussion that they don't like.
It's not really a traditionally liberal point of view: they were always opposed to censorship.
money is power and they have so much that you can't even imagine.
I have no fear.
also: I am not against the ADL persey, in that I used to be a supporter of theirs.
but I thought they were against censorship.
and the bohunk they have running is really is a mensch in a lot of ways. And I'd be unable to be angry at him in person.
but their stand against free speech is very troubling.
I think you could.
what do you think a billy-goat will do with a stack of 100 dolla bills.
they aren't going to go to a restuarant with it.
Jesus Christ is Lord.
you know it, I know it.
spread the word.
sorry if I got it wrong, anon.
but here is the deal: one after the other they both said the same thing. I pointed it out.
that's all.
so you're not a shill, neither am I.
genetics is not an illusion.
race is a way for people to speak about the differences.
pretending that race is meaningless is sticking your head in the sand.
in fact, it rather proves how we create the world with our thoughts.
we see a difference and make a word to describe it.
that's OK.
what isn't OK is someone else using that word to divide and conquor.
I asked you two direct questions.
you choose to deflect.
I can challange someone for their point of view and not be a bigot against their 'type'.
my point is that the other anon seems to be against all types of surgery.
the anti-jewish shill who talks in ignorance about circumcision: what are it's views on having tonsils removed? or an appendix? or adenoids?
or wart removal?
or . . . piercings?
it doesn't really care about children, it's just trying to be hurtful towards people who practice circumcision
everything you write is total disrespect.
you're a total creep.
does that bother you?
how did you get like that?
I even defend your right to free speech.
that way we can see who you are and what you go on about an know what kind of person you are.
you are free to speak and show yourself for who you are.
I dislike censorship, but I understand why sometimes good people fall for it.
it's people like you who just speak to provoke and it's all full of lies.
but still, you have the right to be a liar.
and they have a right to say 'this person is a liar.'
ya know if you understand history you say 'ok, so part6 of why they did the circumcison was because they wanted to quickly be able to identify who was in their clan.
and the other option was that if they were captured, say, by the Parthians or others it wouldn't just be the foreskin that would get cut off.
so they mitigated a bad situation.
there was an asshole guy who was a king in Asia Minor and he decided to cut off all the genitals of the Romans in the area.
well, it didn't end well for him.
my questions were designed to make people think and understand how, even thought they don't think they are, they seem to be bigots and hypocrites.
that's a noble cause.
you're questions?
just designed to distract and not face the hard truth that You seem to be bigoted and hypocrtical.
are you really? or is it all an act.
only you know for sure.
so look to yourself and try to solve your own bigotry.
I defend your right to say what you want even when you are wrong but slander is a bad thing and you have no right to do that.
ricky don't loose that number
it's the only one you own
you might use it if you feel better
when you get home . . .
we are free to say what we NEVER would
and we don't say that.
we are still free to do it.
controlled speech is what people are SUPPOSED to do (by themself).
when it's somoene else doing it that is when it's censorship.
the state doesn't control speech
they can only punish those who disobey their illegal control.
you're a vile asshole
what you suggest as a vile insult to someone else is what might be considered for you.
you wouldn't have said that to cousin.
NO, I'll never accept what you said as 'normal'
and even the most hardhearted people won't agree that saying that was a 'good thing.'