TY fake gerbil
Anon see's you! :D
>>>13643800 Rift breaks open between Pelosi, far-left 'Squad' over Israel
Gosh Guise! what a fucking coincidence that the muh joo shills align perfectly with the demicratic socialists!
ISNT THAT FUCKING AMAZING?
Get away from Anon you fucking Idiot before you get some of your shill slime on ANON!
Largest collection of conspiracy minded 1488 skinheads in the world.
No, Anon is POSITIVE that Q knew exactly what Q was doing.
and Anon means fucking destroyed!
Pack a lunch, Pussies!
Anon ain't even mad!
kek
THE PROTOCOLS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion
“Henry Ford funded printing of 500,000 copies that were distributed throughout the United States in the 1920s. Distillations of it were assigned by some German teachers, as if factual, to be read by German schoo lchildren after the Nazis came to power in 1933,
[3] despite having been exposed as fraudulent by the British newspaper The Times in 1921 and the German Frankfurter Zeitung in 1924.
It remains widely available in numerous languages, in print and on the Internet, and continues to be presented by neofascist, fundamentalist and antisemitic groups as a genuine document.
The political scientist Stephen Bronner described it as "probably the most influential work of antisemitism ever written… what the Communist Manifesto is for Marxism, the fictitious Protocols is for antisemitism".[2]”
Who is Maurice Joly and what is he Famous for?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Joly
'"Posthumous fame'''
The "Dialogue" and its author became famous later, inadvertently and for an enigmatic reason. In the beginning of 20th century Joly's book was used as a basis for The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,[18]
an infamous Russian-made antisemitic literary forgery. There is an abundance of evidence that The Protocols were lavishly plagiarized from Joly's book.[19][20][21][22]"
The Protocols is widely considered influential in the development of other conspiracy theories,[citation needed] and reappears repeatedly in contemporary conspiracy literature. Notions derived from the Protocols include claims that the "Jews" depicted in the Protocols are a cover for the Illuminati,[37] Freemasons, the Priory of Sion or, in the opinion of David Icke, "extra-dimensional entities".[101] In his book And the truth shall set you free (1995),Ickeasserted that the Protocols are genuine and accurate.[102]
And wasn't it William Cooper who included a copy of the Protocols in his book "Behold a Pale Horse"?
http://www.herbogeminis.com/IMG/pdf/william_cooper-behold_a_pale_horse1991-7.pdf
And with a very weak if not very misleading Disclaimer, Anon might add
Author's Note: This is an exact reprint of the original text. This has been written intentionally to deceive people.
For clear understanding, the word "Zion" should be "Sion"; any reference to "Jews" should be replaced with the word "Illuminati"; and the word "goyim" should be replaced with the word "cattle."
Yes, very weak and/or also meant to mislead because "THE ILLUMINATI" bogey man is just as false as the Protocols and the reason why is because Weishaupt was a Jesuit and his little Illuminati experiment was a honey pot for intellectuals and an attempt to infiltrate the masonic orders which failed miserably.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminati
Try to read between the lines "He was the only non-clerical professor at an institution run by Jesuits".
And wasn't it the FBI who recently dropped a copy of the Protocols with no Disclaimer?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/08/20/fbi-apology-twitter-anti-semitism/
Dozens perhaps hundreds of times by now, Shilly Fakers put the Protocols in notes with Zero explanation or Disclaimer, just like the Alphabet's and other Agents do, because they want people to believe it is true without question/debate.
and last but not least, we have:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dialogue_in_Hell_Between_Machiavelli_and_Montesquieu
The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu [1] (in the original French Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu ou la politique de Machiavel au XIXe siècle) is a political satire written by French attorney Maurice Joly in protest against the regime of Napoleon III, a.k.a. Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte who ruled France from 1848-1870. It was translated into English in 2002. Small portions were translated in 1967 as an appendix to Norman Cohn's Warrant for Genocide, which identifies it as the main source of the later Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
The piece uses the literary device of a dialogue of the dead, invented by ancient Roman writer Lucian and introduced into the French belles-lettres by Bernard de Fontenelle in the 18th century. Shadows of the historical characters of Niccolò Machiavelli and Charles Montesquieu meet in Hell in the year 1864 and dispute on politics. In this way Joly tried to cover up a direct, and then illegal, criticism of Louis-Napoleon's rule.
https://www. nozama .com/Dialogue-Hell-between-Machiavelli-Montesquieu/dp/0739106996
The Dialogue in Hell between Montesquieu and Machiavelli is the source of the world's most infamous literary forgery, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
oh muh gerd, faker! totally no table!
kek
Well kids its been real and its been fun.
Good luck out there!
Surrounded by evil!
Traitors everywhere!
You know, if you like the Drops and all that stuff!
Never mind this info, faker, as that would take all of the fun out of the shill disinfo and leading anons astray is QResearch' forte!
Just here to help!
toodle loo!