Anonymous ID: 32a063 May 10, 2018, 6:47 p.m. No.1365001   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1364756

Look, bud. I'm not trying to promote anything. What you're doing though, is attacking the work I've done, and attempting to destroy the credibility of someone that clearly knows more than you. I doubt anyone cares that much about what you have to say because you have yet to produce anything.

Get angry and tell me to stop talking about things if you want, but I doubt anyone will listen to you much since all you're doing is saying we shouldn't talk about something specific, which feels MUCH more like a waste of time than offering information that may be potential lead material.

Now go sit in your corner again, you disruptionfag.

Anonymous ID: 32a063 May 10, 2018, 7:16 p.m. No.1365358   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1365336

see that was the original idea we rolled with earlier today (at least by the time I made it in to the bread). but seeing that link from the post the one you're responding to made, I was kinda thinking I was wrong, and that Q was relating it to something more like what I just mentioned.