>>13648313 (lb)

Have to start thinking that the good guys let Bidan take over think he's president so they could take down the corruption by sabotaging the infrastructure that the bad guys had infiltrated.

Figure, Trump had things running smoothly, and in that situation even the bad guys are profiting. It's hard to expose the corruption when things are running smoothly.

Essentially, the good guys are laying on Bidan what the bad guys tried to lay on Trump.

Keystone pipeline: Don't need pipelines? Let's take one out and find out what it looks like.

Border: Don't need a wall and strong border policy? Open it up and find out what that looks like.

Iran: Don't need to do a Chauvin on their head? Let's open 'negotiations' again so they can use all the blackmail material they have on you to extort money.

The list goes on. Basic premise is that in a Trump administration even the bad guys thrived.

My point is, as bad as it would be for the peeps, it would be the best solution for the peeps long term, because the bad guys are cut out of funding and exposed when the peeps demand answers. The fiddle fucks in the Bidan administration are also exposed as the incompetents they are because the peeps see they're not able to fix anything. That blows up the prospects of the "future leaders" of the dem party.

The key, I'm starting to believe, is China's inability to feed it's own people. They need the US farmland, interior transportation network and ports to survive and have infiltrated the US government to accomplish that.

Only when the entire system breaks down and the peeps demand results can the root of the evil be exposed. Why should Trump allow that to happen on his watch. He tried to convince the peeps with results and that didn't work, so hand off to Bidan and crash the system around him. Takes out the bad guys and the dems in a two'fer.