Someone mentioned that Simon Parkes made some really good points on the show May 9th, 2021.

They did not mention it was a 4 way (4 people) show. If that person had been a real researcher they would have isolated the time frame so we would not have to suffer thru the babble, YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW. There are good points throughout the video. The subject of the specific dialogue could have been listed.

You know there are 6 specifics of research

Who

Why

What

Where

When

How

You know, if you take away all the 'you know(s)' the show might be reduced to 35 minutes.

I suffered thu it. Exactly what was illuminating?

Generally researchers get 3 separate sources to validate a story. Sometimes though - time is a factor and we 'push' it. I've made mistakes too.

What gets me is commentators say, 'when are they going to ease the mandates, 'when are they going to open up the states'?

It is very telling.

'''The statement should be: When are we going to tell them NO we're not going to submit to your edicts.

When are we going to open the states? Stand down

We do not consent to any mandates.

I don't consent, but now I want more information about residual effects of the vaccinated.

The pipeline was held for ransom? Please….