Anonymous ID: 603672 May 13, 2021, 10:36 p.m. No.13657573   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://endsexualexploitation.org/articles/ncose-law-center-hits-twitter-with-groundbreaking-sex-trafficking-lawsuit/

 

@Jack should've taken the deal.

 

Why didn't section 230 apply to backpage Jack?

 

Does proof of this exist against Twitter?

Yes it does.

 

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/apr/6/backpage-founders-lose-bid-for-new-judge-at-upcomi/

 

Scared yet @Jack?

#SaveTheChildren

Anonymous ID: 603672 May 13, 2021, 11:05 p.m. No.13657704   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://nypost.com/2021/01/21/twitter-sued-for-allegedly-refusing-to-remove-child-porn/

 

"Over the next month, the videos would be reported to Twitter at least three times — first on Dec. 25, 2019 — but the tech giant failed to do anything about it until a federal law enforcement officer got involved, the suit states."

 

What if evidence had been collected proving twitter doesn't remove child abuse material from its platform and is in fact profiting from not removing the material?

 

Would outstanding citizens collecting this information provide it to Federal law enforcement?

 

A good Captain goes down with the ship @Jack

#SaveTheChildren