Just remember with all this bs going on in the middle east. There is NO SUCH THING AS A PALESTINIAN. It was never a country. It was a Roman province originally called Judea, but after the Hebrews rebelled a few times the Emperor had enough, he renamed the province after one of Israels enemy's from their past, the Philistines, as an insult to them. Palestine is the Greek version of Philistine.

So when the media starts talking about so called Palestinians, they are basically talking about a mixed group of people who were left in the region after the Romans destroyed Jerusalem and the temple. Do some research. The enmity between Jacob and Esau has been going on for a long, long time. Who exactly are the fore fathers of the so called Palestinians? It all goes back to the beginning, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Ishmael became the Saudis if I remember correctly and Esau and his descendants were pretty much always assholes. I don't think the Edomites are gonna fair very well in the end days, God has a little something planned for them.

>>13657513

Keep this in mind as well. Jacob and Esau have been enemies since they were in their mothers womb. At one point, SOME of the Edomites were FORCED to become, "Jews." Imagine how that went over with either side. The gist of that suggests to me that there are Jews in the world today, that are NOT actually Jews, at least in the sense that they are not descendants of Jacob, but rather of Esau.

I suspect that may have some relevance to what we see today. Essentially, not all who claim to be Jews really are, at least not in the true sense. On the other hand, God can do some pretty interesting things no matter what He has to work with. Even Edomites can be saved as long as they accept Christ.

In the end, ethnicity isn't really a factor, the question is, do you believe in God and that His son was given as a lamb for the remission of sins and our salvation?

>>13657560

Nope. I have read the bible a lot over the decades. I do listen to Missler often though. I'm not a big fan of most so called, "preachers." Missler uses the text and offers several possibilities as he tells you what he personally thinks. I don't agree with everything he says, but at least his depth of understanding is pretty good when it comes to history and language matters.