PB NO TABLE(image 1)

Not a lawfag but anon contests that there was NO violation of the MCL.

A careful reading of the posted picture of the MCL (image 2) it does say that the source code and any subsequent modifications or revisions would be held in escrow and that the Secretary of State or authorized agent shall USE the software held in escrow for ANALYZING and TESTING the [voting] software and nothing about having to produce the software held in escrow

However!

168.797 states "Inspectors of election; duties; certification of equipment operation.

Not less than 30 minutes before the opening of the polls, the inspectors of election shall arrive at the polling place and prepare the polling place for voting. The inspectors of election shall determine that the correct ballot has been provided to the precinct by comparing the ballot provided with the sample ballot and any other documents provided to the precinct. The inspectors of election shall complete required tests of the equipment of the electronic voting system and certify in writing that the equipment is operating properly. The written certification shall be on a form prescribed by the secretary of state and shall include pertinent information regarding seal numbers, counters, and the operation and use of the particular equipment."

What this anon thinks is important to note is that the inspectors have to certify IN WRITING that the equipment used is OPERATING PROPERLY!! If what has been revealed about the manipulations from Antrim county…