Anonymous ID: 282cbf May 15, 2021, 1:52 a.m. No.13666918   🗄️.is 🔗kun

I have a 1960 Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary.

 

Here is the definition of the word "pogrom":

 

"An organized massacre of helpless people, as orig. of Jews in Russia."

 

I think that mass vaccine campaigns as well as vaccine schedules can be considered pogroms when administered under coercion or when the victims of the vaccines are children or babies. The coerced intervention is applied to millions of people without any recourse when inevitable injuries and deaths occur.

Anonymous ID: 282cbf May 15, 2021, 1:59 a.m. No.13666935   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13666902

 

Del's latest is pretty powerful, too.

 

I've felt pretty alone calling vaccines "bioweapons" for about the last year or two. However, the latest show frankly calls the COVID "vaccines" "bioweapons".

 

https://thehighwire.com/watch/

 

Episode 215

Anonymous ID: 282cbf May 15, 2021, 2:10 a.m. No.13666971   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13666950

 

I'm thinking of writing a lot of small notes to leave different places.

 

Some possible statements:

 

Health is not injected.

 

Vaccines cause autism.

 

Vaccines kill children (SIDS).

 

Vaccines are bioweapons.

 

Ph*ck Pharma. (Actually I wanted that for a t-shirt, but its a bit harsh if you'll be around children)

 

I have tried to access LearntheRisk.org where I bought the postcards some time ago and it seems like it's deplatformed. Brandy Vaughn (former pharmaceutical rep and vaccine truth advocate) who founded the site died mysteriously recently. The site also used to have free downloadable content that you could print out yourself, but the postcards were awesome.

Anonymous ID: 282cbf May 15, 2021, 2:20 a.m. No.13667001   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7023

>>13666974

 

I don't know what you posted this in response to so it could possibly be "satanic" and "gibberish". However, I've seen the phrase here quite a lot recently and I'm starting to wonder: Do some folks call anything challenging to them or outside their current understanding "satanic gibberish". Not to deny the existence of "satanic gibberish" per se (Though most of the time satanic entities don't seem to speak in "gibberish" they are quite intentional and specific in their evil.) but to question the use of the phrase so often here.

Anonymous ID: 282cbf May 15, 2021, 2:38 a.m. No.13667045   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7069

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/05/teenage_boys_are_proving_to_be_unexpected_blessings.html

 

The boys don't take the "woke" female lunacy.

 

My thoughts:

 

Perhaps some of them are even White?

 

Anyone thinking the left cares about minorities is sadly mistaken. When the left says "Black" they are not talking about skin tone. Else Bill Clinton could not have been the "first black President" and Elizabeth Warren would not be a "person of color". They are talking about dedication to evil.

 

In this paradigm a person with standards, love of God, love of country and/or other virtues is White, while those dedicated to corruption, theft, murder, etc. (satanic qualities) is Black.

 

I don't know anyone with truly black or white skin pigment. I think the left (wicked) are pretending to be about "race" when what they are really about is ideology. You can be purple, pink or green in their world as long as you are 100% wicked.

 

Black lives matter= Wicked people matter

 

It's always about THEM, they cannot conceive of other people as human or valuable.

Anonymous ID: 282cbf May 15, 2021, 2:57 a.m. No.13667092   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13667069

 

Thank you.

 

The American Thinker story got me thinking (haha) about the whole "woke" ideology and where it seems to be headed.

 

It occurs to me that to some extent, we can now ignore it and go about building a society that works. Somehow it seems easier to just be truthful. The picture of a teenage boy calmly responding to a deranged lunatic of a teacher captures such a moment.