An antidote to information poisoning.
"8 Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things. 9 Whatever you have learned or received or heard from me, or seen in me—put it into practice. And the God of peace will be with you."
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Philippians%204&version=NIV
https://thehighwire.com/watch/
This recent episode of The HighWire with Del Bigtree is absolutely mind-blowing, imo. He as an interview with Dr. Ian Fleming that covers a lot of ground that very well substantiates the idea that we are looking at a bioweapons attack via the Wuhan/NIH/Ralph Baric research leading to the presence of the "spike protein" in SARS-CoV-2 as well as its use in the vaccines. The spike protein alone is dangerous to human health.
An interesting and compelling point that is made is that if governments around the world begin to understand the link between the Wuhan research, the US research and NIH funding as well as the US patent for the "spike protein (bioweapon?)" there will be potential for international outrage.
Here's a link that I think is really important:
https://www.axios.com/moderna-nih-coronavirus-vaccine-ownership-agreements-22051c42-2dee-4b19-938d-099afd71f6a0.html
Quote:
"What they're saying: NIH said in a statement that its scientists created the "stabilized coronavirus spike proteins for the development of vaccines against coronaviruses, including SARS-CoV-2," and the government consequently has "sought patents to preserve the government's rights to these inventions.""
If the spike protein itself is dangerous does that mean that the US government makes money from vaccines that expose the recipient to a bioweapon? I think that possibility is frighteningly real.
Caps are from The HighWire episode.
I sure hope so. Some very precious (to me) family members who are still "sheep", took those poison jabs.
I've periodically seen posted on line a letter, I think, discussing how people distributing vaccines wanted the lots mixed so that people would miss the impact of "bad lots" and not question the vaccines. I believe this may have happened after a group of serious adverse events occurred in some sort of cluster making it obvious the vaccine was to blame.
I am trying to say that I think this is a known technique by vaccine pushers, the mixing of lots. Since the "authorized" vaccines are not FDA approved and have not completed clinical trials I wonder if all recipients are getting the same products. Perhaps there are undisclosed dosage differences, etc.
Most of the possible adverse events take some time to manifest. Already seeing some spoopy things.
If you are implying the shots aren't dangerous at all, I think you are wrong. If you are suggesting that they are less dangerous than they could have been I think I might agree.
I am seriously hoping some health care folks decided to use saline injections instead. Would save a lot of lives.
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/45-year-old-california-father-of-two-dead-10-days-after-covid-injection/
VAERS is slow walking the real numbers of deaths and injuries.
There's just so much to consider. One has to wonder if the bad habbenings are all being recorded, if white hats did something to ameliorate harms, if contamination or adulteration is occuring post manufacture, etc.
Too much of a Russian Roulette game!
I also wonder if a "bad" vaccine is a cover for a military tribunal execution or something of that nature. So much is tracked. It might be possible to target an individual to get a toxic dose (or not). This lady, media legal analyst got her shot from FEMA.
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/midwin-charles-47-year-old-msnbc-legal-analyst-dead-after-experimental-mrna-covid-shot/
>batshit crazy.
That phrase "batshit crazy" is taking on new meaning in light of Wuhan and SARS-CoV-2.