Anonymous ID: 697b8e May 15, 2021, 3:50 p.m. No.13671229   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1249 >>1304 >>1810

>>13671180 lb

>I don't know if it was from that 5 h video about freemasonry, but I think that it was said that buddah would have walked past a woman being raped because 'karma would deal with it'.

Many think enlightenment means not interfering, so that each being can take their own journey.

I'm not convinced. Kant had a better idea.

 

As for Altiyan, he was unenlightened. He was allowed to observe the bandwagon celeb blackmail rings, was told about how exclusive his membership with the devil-worshiping LARPers was and ultimately broke under pressure and fled to the first and safest exit.

Unfortunately, [they] teach the Devil shit to brainlets and laugh at them behind closed doors.

 

"Satan" is a title.

Anonymous ID: 697b8e May 15, 2021, 4:21 p.m. No.13671469   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1520

>>13671445

I don't take issue with the random banners anons choose sometimes.

My issue is us constantly wasting bread going back and forth about it.

We let brainlets confuse us about the drop and this is the result. It just feels like "don't say Qanon and erase anything that says it" was complete bullshit and all it's ever done was cause grave annoyance.

Anonymous ID: 697b8e May 15, 2021, 5 p.m. No.13671783   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>13671706

Nah.

Nords are alright and are pretty cool.

The real trouble is the body snatchers.

 

A lot of people see ancient symbols like the swastika and connect them to Nords, but this is the wrong interpretations.

Cro Magnon is the product of Nords mating with humans. Ever since the most recent deluge, Cro Magnon has been fighting to stay alive.

The reality is after Atlantis fell, they spread to a lot of different places across the globe, West to mesoamerica and east to the Caucasus Mountains. Plenty of the tribes were nomadic peoples, but they did retain elements of their culture, like with symbols like the hexagram, swastika and dragon symbolism.

 

This isn't to say all of them are 100% perfect people or anything. Some of those tribes mentioned practiced animal sacrificed and ate dead relatives, for instance.

Anonymous ID: 697b8e May 15, 2021, 5:08 p.m. No.13671841   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1899

>>13671821

The term doesn't discriminate. It's not that narrow.

 

>>13671810

noโ€ฆ it's a blanket term. it just means "the bad guy in this particular story"

Of course, if your perspective is you doing evil shit, the "good guys" coming to stop you from doing said evil shit are now "bad guys", right?

Perspective matters.

Anonymous ID: 697b8e May 15, 2021, 5:21 p.m. No.13671952   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>13671899

So, it's a Hebrew word, it's used in Hebrew canon, the same texts that were copied to Catholicism, right?

So, if we take our current understanding of what "Jews" are and what they do, is their "adversary" really a bad guy?

If their god Anu/El/Yahweh has an enemy, is that enemy really ours as well?โ€ฆ

Shouldn't the real "adversary" be the faggots that keep knowledge from us so that we don't figure out their games, who keep us here against out will?

 

This is what Q means.

"Satan" isn't real (outside of its practical use).

The thought of it sure is, though.

So, the next obvious question is what do [they] call the thing we call "Satan"?

 

>>13671903

The charge is it's just one big distraction that never solves anything, only ever annoys and has never had any positive impact here.

I mean, the fact that we still all just call them "Jews" should tell you that the majority of the brainlets talking about the subject(s) are clueless from the beginning.

Anonymous ID: 697b8e May 15, 2021, 5:23 p.m. No.13671970   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1983

>>13671950

At least you're tryingโ€ฆ

Symbols are like utensils.

A fork can kill someone if you shove it violently in to their eye, right? Does that mean you can't just use a fork like a normal person, to eat steak or spaghetti?

 

Tools are tools. The way we prescribe meaning is entirely up to us.

The truth is Maynard just knows more than you do and these archaic understandings of symbolism so many of you have do not gather the full picture.

The good news is Maynard is willing to show you though, if you're willing to suspend disbelief enough to comprehend what he's offering.