Reposting just one more time since it was near the end of the last breads
>[Example]
(And example of how to think about what is being shown)
>Clinton Foundation.
>Post Election Loss.
>Layoffs.
>No Access / Control = No Donations
https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/clinton-foundation-layoffs-228443
After Clinton lost the election, the donations stopped because she wouldn't be in the position to either sell government secrets or be bribed on the behalf of others to enact legislation and the like. Basically, sincce she could no longer be a puppet, nobody was interested in giving her money, and nobody could be paid.
>Today.
>NZ Donation Restart.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1805/S00076/clinton-foundation-gets-another-55m-from-nz-taxpayers.htm
May 7, 2018
"A subsidiary of the controversial Clinton Foundation is set to receive US$3.9m (NZ$5.5m) in taxpayer money in 2018/19, the New Zealand Taxpayers’ Union can confirm. This is in addition to NZ$8m given to the organisation since 2014."
https://conservativedailypost.com/clintons-get-3-9-million-in-taxpayer-money/
Article of the same thing posted today.
>Others?
>Why?
NZ - http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-charities-raked-in-millions-of-taxpayer-dollars/
CHAI received hundreds of millions from foreign nations between 2009 and 2014, including: the United Kingdom ($79.7 million), Australia ($58.6 million), Norway ($38.1 million), Canada ($12.1 million), Ireland ($11.7 million), Sweden ($7.2 million), and New Zealand ($1.2 million).
Others?
>1) Selling Secrets?
They have no secrets to sell anymore. They're not in the position to.
>2) Selling 'Future' Access [regain control/power]?
Nobody actually believes she'll be able to take back control. So, this is not it.
>3) Selling Silence?
This is it. They're extorting the countries that worked with them.
Read below slow and carefully.
>FVEY.
Five Eyes
Why do 'Former' Dignitaries Still Hold SEC Clearance?
>Because if they keep a security clearance, they are still in the system and can legally still be monitored without a warrant?
U.S. to U.S. = Logged/Flagged/Recorded
>If they're in the U.S., everything is being recored.
U.S. [in] NZ = No Logs/No Flags/No Records = U.S. Sec Clearance AUTH FVEY VIEW + Doc Take.
>If they're in other places, like NZ, then the U.S. is not privy unless they have a security clearance. Then Five Eyes can view it, record it, and then give it to us.
Read above slow and carefully.
>WHY DO WE ALLOW [FORMER] DIGNITARIES SEC CLEARANCE?
Because as long as they keep the security clearance, they can legally be spied on wherever they go.
>Welcome to the Deep State.
Been here.
>Future to prove past.
Pic related.
Q