Anonymous ID: fb1d16 May 16, 2021, 8:08 p.m. No.13681018   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1073

>>13681007

https://casetext.com/case/latham-v-1953-tr

 

Searched her name and found this.

Looks like it was dismissed as frivolous.

IDK anything about it. Never heard of her.

 

Part

 

The Court must dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint, or portion thereof, that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); see Livingston v. Adirondack Beverage Co., 141 F.3d 434, 437 (2d Cir. 1998). The Court must also dismiss a complaint when the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). While the law mandates dismissal on any of these grounds, the Court is obliged to construe pro se pleadings liberally, Harris v. Mills, 572 F.3d 66, 72 (2d Cir. 2009), and interpret them to raise the "strongest [claims] that they suggest," Triestman v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 470 F.3d 471, 474 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted, emphasis in original).

 

A claim is frivolous when it "lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324-25 (1989), abrogated on other grounds by Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007); see also Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992) (holding that "finding of factual frivolousness is appropriate when the facts alleged rise to the level of the irrational or the wholly incredible"); Livingston, 141 F.3d at 437 (2d Cir. 1998) ("[A]n action is 'frivolous' when either: (1) the factual contentions are clearly baseless . . . ; or (2) the claim is based on an indisputably meritless legal theory.") (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

 

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Charlene Y. Latham filed this complaint on her own behalf ("Plaintiff #1") and on behalf of her parents, David G. Latham and Tracey Y. Latham ("Plaintiffs #2 and #3," respectively), and their "other children and grandchildren" ("Plaintiffs John Doe 1-10" and "Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1-5.") (ECF 2 ¶ 7.) The 35 named defendants include the City of New York; individuals such as Harvey Weinstein, Shawn Carter, Beyoncé Knowles, Kanye West, Robert Kelly, Ghislaine Maxwell, and David Boies; and entities such as Miramax, the Walt Disney Company, Def Jam Recordings, Universal Music Group, Sprint, Viacom, Sony, and "the 1953 Trust," which is the estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Plaintiff alleges that Epstein "initiated" the events giving rise to this complaint.

Anonymous ID: fb1d16 May 16, 2021, 8:24 p.m. No.13681116   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1128 >>1173

>>13680861

4

Anonymous 10/29/2017 12:11:40 ID: P3Lk4PKG

4chan Thread/Post: 147075091 / 147106598

Direct Link: 147106598

Some of us come here to drop crumbs, just crumbs.

POTUS is 100% insulated - any discussion suggesting he’s even a target is false.

POTUS will not be addressing nation on any of these issues as people begin to be indicted and must remain neutral for pure optical reasons. To suggest this is the plan is false and should be common sense.

Focus on Military Intellingence/ State Secrets and why might that be used vs any three letter agency

What SC decision opened the door for a sitting President to activate - what must be showed?

Why is POTUS surrounded by generals ^^

Again, there are a lot more good people than bad so have faith. This was a hostile takeover from an evil corrupt network of players (not just Democrats).

Don’t fool yourself into thinking Obama, Soros, Roth’s, Clinton’s etc have more power present day than POTUS.

Operation Mockingbird

Patriots are in control. Sit back and enjoy the show.

 

Time stamp

2227

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 09/20/2018 13:29:42 ID:

Archive Bread/Post Links: 62 / 267

Direct Link: 267

2157

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 09/11/2018 19:27:53 ID:

Archive Bread/Post Links: 62 / 221

Direct Link: 221

Panic in DC.

James Baker testifying against Comey?

Q

 

>>221

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOwr9PX05p4

[13:35]

Q

Anonymous ID: fb1d16 May 16, 2021, 8:40 p.m. No.13681214   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1261

Nebraska Dad Hunted After Kids, 3 and 5, Found Dead at His Home

 

A manhunt is on for the Nebraska father of two children found dead at his home—on the police’s third visit to the home in less than a day.

 

The youngsters’ mother, Mary Nielsen, asked officers in Bellevue to go to the house because their dad was supposed to check in using FaceTime while they were visiting him, and she had not heard from them since Thursday night.

 

Officers went to Adam Price’s home shortly before 10 p.m. on Saturday and again around 9 a.m. on Sunday morning “but did not observe exigent circumstances that would allow them to force entry into the home,” Capt. Andy Jashinske said in statement.

 

Nielsen then called a friend to go check, and that person found 3-year-old Theodore Price and his 5-year-old sister Emily dead, and then called police, the Omaha World Herald reported.

 

The children’s cause of death has not been released, but police said it was suspicious, and they put out an alert for Price, who is believed to be in a dark blue Mazda CX7 with Nebraska license plate No. VGY434.

 

In a Facebook post that has since been taken down, Nielsen posted a heart-wrenching goodbye to her kids.

 

“I’m so sorry to see you two go. You did not deserve this and I love you so very much. I would fight a thousand fights to have you back again,” she wrote.

 

“Heaven gained two beautiful angels and I hope great grandpa was at the gates to greet you. You were the only reasons I survived everything I did and the only reason I am alive. I love you. Til we meet again my sweet babies.”

 

A relative set up a GoFundMe to help with funeral expenses. “Emi and Teddy were some of the sweetest most loving children and did not deserve to leave the earth this way,” the post read.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/nebraska-dad-hunted-kids-3-021329977.html