Interesting phenomena about RRN vs something like CNN. CNN starts with vapor and spins yarns into society destroying narratives which many people unfortunately believe as true. Belief/acceptance/submission to such subsequently fuels further the society destroying effort CNN seems hell bent on achieving. RRN starts with plausible/if not factually based starting points, and spins a narrative that might not yet be probable but if in fact was true or came true, would actually make the world a better place.
Subtle difference between RRN and CNN, but the outcomes would be worlds different. One clearly bad, the other much more positive. Just interesting, and for that i thought RRN deserves attention for that reason. The author seems interesting as well.
Can blow me