Anonymous ID: 098dc6 May 17, 2021, 7:07 a.m. No.13683534   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>13683329

 

They tried to get her out right after her impeachment vote, but she still had support.

 

Tells me this last vote means popularity of MTG and Boebert calling out the GOPe bullshit made Cheney's stance a liability, wrt to re-election, for anyone supporting her.

 

Cheney could have stepped aside, but decided to double-down, instead. She may have thought her 'protection' would carry the day.

 

To me, her 'protection' is obviously the elite pol group around the IC/MSM nexus and that their holy grail is the, "Election was legit", mantra.

 

My 2¢ worth is she was trying to find and pass on information about election fraud procedure/strategy and got caught out in a canary trap. Probably a really dumb one, to boot, and now she has to hope for some type of support through the MSM. It's just desperation at this point.

 

Hope I'm right, because it would mean uncovering the fraud is on a roll and the 'protection' Cheney was counting on ain't there.

Anonymous ID: 098dc6 May 17, 2021, 7:19 a.m. No.13683623   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3752

>>13683509

 

NYT = Limited hangout.

 

"Fess' up" by saying "they" (the ubiquitous "they") worked to fool our reporters about Russiagate, but we're smarter now, so we ain't going get fooled again by Chinagate.

 

Just frontrunning why they're not going to cover any Bidan scandal about to open up.

 

Anyway, if we ever, finally, find out who "they" is, we need to beat the shit out of them.