In theory, a system which scans/records/monitors every private citizen in a public space is:

(a) technically constitutionally acceptable, because individuals in a public space have fewer expectations of privacy.

(b) hard to argue against because we are already on camera most of the day - whether we're on a security cctv at the store, or behind the dashcam of another motorist, we know (even if we deny/don't think about it) that we're being watched.

the troubling part is when that data is mishandled, misused, or exploited. how do we make sure that pandora's security box doesn't turn into pandora's blackmail box?

open source. public access. full disclosure.

re-write the rules about public privacy?

>>1370031

yes.

we are to document and spread knowledge to prevent memory-holing.

look how much we know about the selectivity of the MSM. the news orgs are connected and suppressive.

archive everything offline.

>>129526

>a scary but safe personalized message finds its way to you on multiple platforms

take a moment folks.

just a moment.

think about the implications of a monitoring system so deep that it recognizes faces against a database, one billion entries thick.

and then logs those faces.

what we are going to learn is that to the people in power, truly in power, there are no secrets.

we are all known. the shills, they are all known.

some of the negative voices on here, who were on 4ch, on twat - yes, those were ai bots. but some of them are actors from orgs who actually know.

that's what Q means.

we are all known.

>>1370084

if she has to beg for it, it exists.

if it exists, other people have it.

this isn't about whether or not the data is known (as a given, it is) or used (as a given, it is) or even secure (as a given, it is - for a price).

it's about dropping that veil, and dealing with it.

when i was born, data collection was not automated, but you can bet that organized intelligence kept lists. want to know something about someone, let's pull out the file.

that's what the JFK data dump taught us.

there were efforts back then - documents were shoddy, record keeping sucked - but as an effort, it existed.

what do we do, as humans? we perfect, we refine, we sharpen our edges and build machines to help us build machines.

the tools got better, and the information stores got larger.

then we hit another wall - we can collect data, we can store data, and we can even recall data - but how do we analyze data? how do we use what we know?

computers have helped every step of the way. larger drives, more dense storage, faster memory - all stepping stones in the effort to know humans, know what we're doing, keep track of us.

information wants to be free - tough shit for us.

we can either live behind the 'muh privacy' shroud, and let ourselves be exploited, or bring everyone out of the cave and try to deal with 'this is who we are, now let's try to be good to each other'.

this is the singularity BEFORE the singularity.

>>1370265

pretty sure it's a '55 nomad bel air hood ornament.

>>1370284

spread it, then. it's not a honeypot if 3 billion people see it.