Anonymous ID: 01effb May 11, 2018, 6:43 a.m. No.1370726   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0759 >>0833 >>0921 >>1043

>>1370634

>Hussein's EO 13526 Sec 4.4

The President Executive Order 13526

Classified National Security Information

Sec. 4.4. Access by Historical Researchers and Certain Former Government Personnel.

[code]code The requirement in section 4.1(a)(3) of this order that access to classified information may be granted only to individuals who have a need-to-know the information may be waived for persons who:(1) are engaged in historical research projects;(2) previously have occupied senior policy-making positions to which they were appointed or designated by the President or the Vice President; or(3) served as President or Vice President.(b) Waivers under this section may be granted only if the agency head or senior agency official of the originating agency:(1) determines in writing that access is consistent with the interest of the national security;(2) takes appropriate steps to protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure or compromise, and ensures that the information is safeguarded in a manner consistent with this order; and(3) limits the access granted to former Presidential appointees or designees and Vice Presidential appointees or designees to items that the person originated, reviewed, signed, or received while serving as a Presidential or Vice Presidential appointee or designee.

https://www.archives.gov/isoo/policy-documents/cnsi-eo.html#four

Anonymous ID: 01effb May 11, 2018, 6:55 a.m. No.1370838   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1370762

>>1370790

 

Oh look, a new honey pot for clowns to entrap (identify, evaluate and assassinate) whistle-blowers!

They keep trying the same thing over and over. This new one is probably because their old ones have been outed (ty Q and anons)

Anonymous ID: 01effb May 11, 2018, 7:12 a.m. No.1371009   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1054

>>1370939

Yes, NAFTA, CAFTA & GATT were terrible, but that's not the point. The point is not taking at face value what is published, especially authored by people in govt (Congress, in this case) and others. Many times these articles are communication between one party to another, just in public and in a way that makes it appear that it is for the public (pretext). Read between the lines, mirror, and/or think below surface level.

 

It seems to me that these Congrespersons are signalling that they are not free to support POTUS in getting out of NAFTA, but not of their own accord.

Anonymous ID: 01effb May 11, 2018, 7:20 a.m. No.1371081   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1370921

>this was designed to keep the clintons in the loop

Bushes, too. Makes sense

 

>>1371054

You're welcome and me, too (on the records), that's why we keep all these records in different formats.