ARIZONA RECOUNT

Gotta love it.

Here’s the headline from the web site of the local CBS affiliate, AZFamily.com

“Arizona auditors backtrack, say no election data destroyed”

BY JONATHAN J. COOPER ASSOCIATED PRESSPOSTED 16 HRS AGO

Issue #1

The auditors never said that election data was “destroyed.” They said data files had been deleted.

They stated yesterday that they had been able to recover the deleted files, but they never backtracked from their original statement.

Issue #2

We have local reporters here in Phoenix, but this article, with the highly misleading headline, is from an AP pool reporter.

Isn’t this an issue of significant importance that you would invest in some local investigative reporting?

Realize that for the vast majority of the ill informed public these types of “news bites” are all they will ever know as they go about their lives trusting that “someone else” has their back.

This is why we are where we are.

AUDIT

The cheaters know where the fraud is. By now, they must have discussed it and also know how the fraud can be found. So they know what to destroy, delete, hide, obfuscate or cast aspersions on.

The first way to cheat is to produce additional ballots, and complete them. How is that fraud found? No creases in the ballot, ballot marking machine marks, only one office marked, more ballots than registered voters etc.

The second way is the manipulation of the machines to change, add, or delete votes. How is that fraud found? More votes than voters, 100% of people voting, forensic data on the machines showing outside access, polling vs results, etc.

The third way is to go into the neighborhood, knock on doors, and have people complete and sign their ballots. They could also collect the unvoted ballots and complete them themselves. They may also pay people to get their ballots or have the person sign them. Ballot harvesting is illegal in most states but how do you catch that? You would have to look at signatures and signature matching. But that data is now separate from the ballots so you would not know which ballot is fraudulent. Perhaps the canvassing of voters to see if harvesting happened. Or polling, etc.

The fourth way is to adjudicate ballots. Have the machine kick out an inordinate number of ballots, have your cronies, then take each of those ballots and decide how it was voted. In some cases, I thought I saw workers actually completing the ballots. So if the circle was not fully filled in, they would fill it in. Those adjudicated ballots are segregated so someone could go through them again and see if the adjudication process was accurate. It would be hard to tell if workers were filling in blanks with a vote for their preferred candidates.

So all of these are ways to cheat. Mailing out millions of unsolicited ballots just enhances that ability to cheat. I wonder how these cheaters set up their operation. Did they use every possible method? Did they just use a little bit of each? Did they focus on machine manipulation? It would have to be organized to involve as few people as possible, so fewer people to whistleblow.

I hope this audit exposes it because I think this fraud was nationwide and organized by the same few people. They probably focused it on the battleground states, and limited it to sympathetic counties. The size of the fraud needed exposed them a little. Joe Biden did not get 80 million votes.

This whole election fiasco(es) has now reached my boiling point with smoke coming out of my ears. At least with local and state elections, there are remedies when there is fraud. However, the way things are set-up now for Presidential elections there is no real remedy – why? Because once the electors are chosen and they vote, there is no going back. So, considering the timetable for electing President, there is simply no time to get to the bottom of things; in other words, in this case, crime (fraud) does pay. We have seen that once voting is over, that is it, nobody, including any courts are really going to do anything.

What I suggest and I am going to go to my state legislators is that the only real solution as I see it, is that the State Legislators TAKE BACK THEIR AUTHORITY and CHOOSE the ELECTORS themselves DIRECTLY. They have the power to do this! I hope a trend for this starts and starts now!

Its is also now clear how both voter/election fraud and the false choice of Rino vs Dem uniparty has given most Americans the illusion of choice as well as the false notion of the legitimacy of the US government.

MI fraud exlained

per the plaintiff attorney in Antrim Co. Michigan

…the court said that it did not rule on the presented evidence, did not rule on the facts of the plaintiff.

…the court said that statute says the MI. Secretary of State can define the word ‘audit’ of election (and whatever that is, or is not, is what the sec. says it is, or is not.)

[ i.e. an ‘audit’ may be a partial or selective count, and if defined as so, it may not be a full audit, let alone a forensic audit ]

There are grounds for appeal.

As well as new cases in other MI. counties.

MI. Constitution says that any citizen can request an audit.

And that the State legislature can expand on the definition of audit, but can not narrow the ‘audit’ definition.

(for instance, in Az., the State legislature effectuates the pre-written election law

(not Gov., not Sec. State, not county board of supervisors, not media )

p.s.

to put it lightly,

Antrim County had a forensic audit of the election machines – and found irregularities.

Checking with the paper record, the other evidence, the ballots could be of help with the case.

p.s.

the lame (quiet) media will make noise to try make it sound like…it is all over…

but

the whole truth is still not judged upon, or revealed… [ a lot (designed machine errors / fraud, with changing and backdating of tallies) was discovered in Antrim Co. MI. ]

For Anons.

FRAUD.

Based on the testimony, I see two issues:

1/ Router access. Maricopa rightly denies access to their operational, managed routers. Audit team should clarify what information they seek. If the info is in Splunk, Maricopa agrees to provide it. If the requested info is not in Splunk, it may reside in a Solarwinds type management system, or a system collecting netflow info. If the info does exist only in the routers, perhaps Maricopa can harvest it from the router local log files. This issue should be resolvable imo.

2/ The 2nd issue relates to admin passwords, which Maricopa claims are held by two Dominion full-time contractors. There is no IT world in which full-time contractors “own” passwords. Those passwords are the property of Maricopa county and contractors are, without question, required to divulge them to Maricopa IT personnel. However, if the audit team can recover the password hashes, which is generally pretty easy to do, and the passwords are shorter than about 18 characters, the passwords can likely be obtained using open source password crackers.

All other issues relate to election policy and procedures.

I continue to think that what matters first and foremost is the vote count in the presidential race. Other races may count also but most distrust is over the presidential race.

Secondarily, issues with Dominion machines are of interest. The problem for auditors however are two fold: A/ Findings are apt to be highly technical and easily undermined with derp. And, B/ Dominion has been at this game long enough they are unlikely to leave behind smoking guns for auditors to discover.

Re the machines… our position should simply be they provide too many opportunities to cheap and hence they should be abandoned. They might be workable if there were stringent and bipartisan procedures, no dominion personnel involved, the elections were run by independent professionals, chosen by lots for a given location, and detailed independent auditing were randomly performed of 10% of polling locations selected randomly AFTER an election.

THEORY

Serious work on the planning and preparation for the Big 2020 Steal might have gone back to as early as December, 2016 after Trump won in November, 2016.

For all we know, the tools and techniques needed to perpetrate industrial scale vote fraud were given a test in the 2018 mid-terms, with lessons learned then applied as needed for the 2020 election cycle.

It has all gone according to plan, until this month. The Arizona forensic audit is the first serious bump in the road for the Democrat’s Big Steal project. At this point, it is not at all certain how the Arizona audit and its aftermath will turn out as far as putting the Big 2020 Steal on ice.

It’s also possible that a pilot program was implemented for the Democratic primary. Biden lost Iowa, NH, & CO (?) badly, then won in SC and in stunning fashion virtually swept the rest of the states. Yes, other candidates were bribed to get out of the race but some of the Biden wins occurred where Bernie was up significantly in the polls. That smells of election fraud.

I suspect they had realized that with voting machines an election can be pre-arranged and fixed months in advance. Sure beats the farce of pretending to find votes in a car trunk (the Al Franken method).

The huge dump of mail-in ballots was not the crime, it was the cover-up of the crime.

But in the Iowa Caucus, they immediately found the flaw in pre-setting the winner. Kamala had been all set up to win, and then she dropped out (!). For her protection, they didn’t warn her the vote had been rigged in her favor. So after weeks of haggling and confusion, Buttigieg got the booby prize.

I think we see now why Biden and Kamala barely ever bothered to go out and campaign in the 2020 election. Biden knew the fix was in – he bragged about the extensive voter fraud that had been arranged. So Sleepy and Kameltoe could only hurt their cause with a slip of the tongue.

Biden also stated “I don’t need your votes.” Because, no, he didn’t.

I think a LOT of people have no idea that there was fraud.

Remember, in most cases we’re talking about low-level local bureaucrats with little to no technical knowledge of the systems they use. They can push a few buttons and feed ballots into the machines. If a Dominion “contractor” told them a thumb drive was for normal system admin and “totes legit”, they’d trust him implicitly. If they thought the Dominion employee actions somehow violated election integrity, they’d cover it up simply because it would expose the bureaucrats as incompetent. I would bet in more than a few of these cases that the locals have NO IDEA what was actually done with the votes.

Not everywhere. I think the fix was in and there are people who know what was done. But for something like this to work, you have to keep it small and compartmentalize it like the Intelligence community does. The problem is the “tell” signals are too strong. They all stopped counting (which is never done) at the same time, they all magically produced “just enough” votes for Biden to win outside the margin of mandatory recounts… but not really any more than the minimum he needed. And of course the ballot dumps were absurdly one-sided, 96-4% for Biden, that sort of thing. I could show the election night graphs to a 3rd grader and ask “What do you notice about this?” And I bet the average 3rd grader would point out that the graph goes “straight up” then continues. That profile only shows up in the fraud states…which means a machine algorithm was used.

If you listen to a lot of the bureaucrats, they’ll keep parroting that the numbers match. Never mind that those numbers can be edited after the fact to ensure that they match. A nontechnical person would have no clue.

Consider what it takes to be on the side of those cheating on our elections.

I don’t believe that most of them are in it for the money. They must truly believe that they are righteous and that those who they are cheating (us) are evil. They need to justify in their own minds that what they are doing is right.

In 1856 there was extensive election cheating in the territory of Kansas. The stakes involved whether Kansas would be a free or a slave state. Due to the Kansas-Nebraska Act and the principle of popular sovereignty, large numbers of anti-slavery Northerners flooded into Kansas–a state that Southerners felt should be slave by right. The popular vote was overwhelmingly anti-slavery/free, but Southerners flooded the territory with pro-slavery Missourians, winning the vote. The outcome was so illigitimate that the House of Representatives refused to seat the representative from Kansas. Two competing governments arose from that fraudulent vote. The free-staters were led by Charles Robinson who wrote a book about his experiences. Arrested and charged with treason, he was eventually freed and the slave-state governor fled due to popular sentiments.

What saved the free-staters in Kansas? Sharps rifles and canon, as well as a ruckus in the Northeast against the fraudulent vote and the treatment of Robinson. Yes, the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution was what saved the free-state of Kansas, as well as fear by Democrat Buchanan (one of the worst presidents) that he would lose the upcoming election if peace were not restored in Kansas. The 2nd Amendment may save us too, but we need coordination much like that provided by Charles Robinson. He was no raving maniac. He was calm, long-suffering, but determined. We need a man like him today. Charles Robinson hated blood-thirsty people like John Brown. Truth be told, he thought Abraham Lincoln was too radical–a significant failure to understand the seriousness of Southern treason.

What is the moral of this story? Stay determined. Organize. Never cede a principled position. Make a ruckus and let your voice be heard. Let your Republican representatives know that you will never vote again unless they secure against election fraud. There can be no more electronic voting machines. There must be mechanisms in place to ensure election integrity. This, or the Republican Party shall be no more.

AZ - reason for PANIC for THEM

It should be well remembered that it is the Arizona State Government which is acting here by its own “plenary” authority. The State Senate has the unquestionable and undeniable right to satisfy itself – by whatever means it alone sees fit – that the laws which it enacted were, in fact, “faithfully executed” by the public officials whom it charged to do so. The Senate has the power to compel testimony – particularly among other state employees – and to issue subpoenas. It can command its Sergeant-at-Arms to round people up and compel them to appear. It has the power to declare anyone to be in contempt of itself, and this is also a felony offense.

ARS Title 16 includes penal provisions which declare “election fraud” to be at least a Class-5 Felony.

This is these criminals’ worst nightmare. This is the one thing that they assured themselves could never happen. A decent lawyer could stop or at least gum-up a lawsuit, but this is not a lawsuit. Perkins-Coie has no power here. This is an opponent they have no power to deny.

A game of chess sometimes takes longer than you might wish. But, when the final move is made, the King has no escape.

Kindly notice that, at this point in the chess game, the Senate is not directly accusing anyone of having committed a crime. It is simply asking questions about what happened, of the people who are specifically tasked for carrying out its laws in Maricopa County. These are exactly the right people to be asking, and they have no power nor position not to answer.

It goes without saying that these people know they are guilty-as-hell of a felony crime, and they know it. But chess tightens the noose around the King rather slowly. And, the very worst thing that these people could possibly be doing right now … is exactly what they’re doing. They’re going to slip up, and do it under oath. They’re going to be confronted with indisputable evidence of their crimes, frantically study the case that has been systematically built against them, and find that there is no way out.

Then, other States will be obliged to start doing the same thing. And so the dominoes will fall. We all owe the Arizona Senate a debt we can’t repay – no one else could be doing this right now.

To summarize…

The auditors requested the routers and the logs. (these are not the hard drives)

The county said that it would be difficult.

Auditors: We can look at them, in place, so they don’t have to be moved.

County: We’ve already removed them, and replaced them at great expense to taxpayers. We’ll send them with everything else on the 21st.

Auditors on the 21st: Where are the routers and logs; they never arrived.

County: We never removed the routers from our system. You can look at them virtually.

Auditors: Fine, when can we start?

County: You can’t look at them virtually because it will expose citizen social security numbers, and police data.

Auditors: What? None of that should be on there, and if it is, then the routers would have had to have been connected to the internet which you claim they weren’t. Are you saying that the routers were illegally connected to the internet?

County: ‘crickets’

ASK YOURSELF

The Senate in Arizona was put into place by the Dominion Voting Machines. Would you derail the same company, that put you into office?

Would believe a Senator who said, I didn’t know I owned my office to a machine, and to those who controlled it?

Remember, Dr Frank. He estimates this has been going on for two decades.