more fake Q.
why haven't you been banned?
oh ya, that's all just a drama play, all the same psyops are being run all the time.
>>13708442
did I say that I'd ban it?
does look fake.
the BV is the one who bans, part of what seems to be another conflict play.
bullshit uneducated conflation repeated all day
what one explaination is for the last view days of BV being mr ban-hammer is that some of the baker team decided to up the total creep factor of their posts, and started putting in 'hail evil' types of posts. and they just can't have that. Becausae they know that there are a certain percentage that would be influenced and flow along with it.
proleey is a word they use as a reveal that they are hollywierd donktators with their 'if I say it you must follow along'.
they do twit things like say 'do not ever use that phrase'. And I think it is to bait you to always use it.
anyway it's the same crew, the same mean, the stupid constant repetitious false explanations about 'why the world is like it is' with the chatterers and thier quick two word 'summation falsely' posts like 'bubonic plagerist' or others
same old same old.
board is still occupied territory.
Q has not posted in months, and there is little chance that will happen soon.
and the people who willfully run this place like a limited hang honey paught would love to get you alone and slap you on the face with their . . .
if they had any.
constant cringe barf images are still here.
their is obviousness in putting a hanging tree image, and the flagpole being positioned so that it looks like a rope around the necks . . . it is too obvious to ignore as the act of these depraved boast scolds, who must taint everything because they think that their clevel symbolic defiling casts a spell. they present that type as a 'baker'. But the frequency of it is high for it to be a real person, but the 'player' or part in a script.