>>13711440

What if you didn't (You) them over and over again and just did your job and quit involving yourself in petty dramas?

What if this place worked like it used to, where every single one of us didn't have to (You) each other to be heard and we instead had valuable and informative conversations or posted pertinent information?

What if we weren't bogged down by bots using scripts that scalp news headlines hundreds of posts per bread?

What if we had bakers that baked and didn't also have 40 posts bare minimum per bread, with an update on notables every five minutes?

What if we had BVs that just jannied and didn't (You) all of the obvious shills trying to get you to do the exact thing you're doing?

>>13711990

What is the point of further provocation?

If you need to use the reply feature, at the very least don't give them the (You).

>>13712147

You're dead wrong.

I bitched and squirmed for literal years here.

On the contrary, I think you're the type that caused this to manifest.

But that's beside the point. Division is exactly their aim and throwing stones at one another is entirely pointless.

>>13712161

I explicitly remember bitching for about a year over faggots coming here and thinking it's okay to identify themselves to one another.

We should've known then…