Have you tried not (You)ing anybody and just being a janny yet?
>>STFU and let us subvert the board Goyim
Actually, I think the only ones subverting the board are the retards we mostly agree are only here to slide or divide. I think BV is getting caught up in something he shouldn't be. I'm not casting doubt on BV's integrity, just pointing out he's acting like a child, even at risk of being called a hypocrite.
I have no problem saying what needs to be said.
Not "God", but Creator.
Also, Luciferianism doesn't hinge upon Gnosticism.
Besides, the dogma that centers upon Lucifer alone and not its iterations (Christ; the story of Enki) aren't helpful.
If you understand that Lucifer was just some other guy and not some God or demon masquerading as one you start to understand how retarded framing understanding adequately Lucifer's position as "Luciferianism" is.
This is like calling us a Q cult when instead we recognize what Q did and how he helped to luminate so many of us.
You cast these understandings off as "satanic gibberish" because it's easier to protect yourself from where you're wrong by framing whatever we talk about as "bad things".
You're the one that's getting sloppy, I'm afraid. Not making efforts to better understand what you criticize is a very big mistake to make.
There are many "God"s, anon. There is only one Creator. That Creator permeates through all living beings. You'd know this if you'd had a spiritual experience in your life and not simply an aspiritual experience.
Lucifer was the adversary of the Old Testament "God", hence his being called "Satan".
Who was the Old Testament "God"? That's the real question.
>Q does nothing to minimize the divinity of Jesus, or diminish the finished work Jesus did on the cross. So, not a cult. Learn what "cult" means. Protip: Look for the leaders of cults to be having sex with children.
>Does that sound like what Q is into?
ugh…
You aren't even reading, are you?
>And the God of the Old Testament is the same God of the New Testament, and that is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Wrong.