>one last try.

BO/BVs

Anon is permalurker, occasional baker and updater of bakertools. Anon has experienced all the flavours of division faggotry. Anon is confused by recent BV activations and the rules are no longer clear. Anon requests certain clarification to be confident that this BV activation is not a new and sophisticated version of division faggotry. There aren't hard and fast rules as anon understands, but instead a tribally accepted set of principles that can be determined while lurking. Anon will attempt to list some. Anon requests that BO/BVs develop and agree principles that reflect the new era of the board and post them as BO and that post is a global notable.

>Principles:

>All anons are equal.

>Baking is an anon service and duty, bakers are anons who are more resistant to manipulation.

>Notables are determined by baker. Anon noms are preferred, self noms are discouraged. Anon corrections are encouraged but must be knife edge specific. Vague, irrational, illogical complaints are a form of division faggotry.

>Malevolent anons get filtered, Malevolent bakers are given specific feedback, if ignored the only remedy is to ask for the bake, if hostile baker refuses only then is a bread split to be considered.

>Spam is the repeating of posts that have no value, until recently spam was the price of anon humint and were not removed. Spamming breads was a preferable remedy to malevolent bakers than bread splitting.

>Concern for optics is only valuable in a fair, honest, open system. Those days are gone. Optics fagging = division fagging. Required optics will be generated by malevolent actors at best, instead the reactions to negative optics occur without the need of their existence.

>Notables are not your mothers facebook news feed, nor are they primarily a news aggregator. They are relevant to the mood of the bread at the time, their purpose should be to glue breads together for diggs and to give timezone anons a bread summary to catch them up to the feel of the current bread.

Anon had to stop to think for too long, meaning this is the list that matters right now. This is simply a guide of what is being asked for.

>>13717130

One could reasonably argue that a change in BV culture forces a change of board culture. Don't get anon wrong, increased BV presence has been required. Anon had interest to become BV due to timezone and logic flex, so had some thoughts as to what a BV should do. In anons humble opinion a BV is mostly concerned with the metadata of a bread, duties being renumbering, locking duplicates, preventing and rectifying kitchen theft and bread splits. BVs only concern for bread content was deleting CP, dox and on the odd occasion exposing schizopherenic shills arguing with themselves, but only to restore confidence in a legit baker, or to clarify Qs attributes during the wee hours when the bread is populated by majority newfags. Anything of more importance would be settled by someone higher up the chain, anything of lower importance is the cost of anon humint. Now that there is a more aggressive enforcement of the no spam rule, it has to make sense, to convince anons with functional headboxes that this is justified and required.

>break.

Take for example the favorite football of division, JQ. The premise seems to generally be that the head of the snake is jews and that they are all born evil. What are the rules that change this from opinion to spam? At one extreme a BV must be present and active in every bread to del the 3-5 tor posts that interrupt or immediately proceed the dough. At a different extreme JQ posts can only be deleted when they are identical and sequential, and only in that bread. At yet another extreme JQ content is always spam unless the post details some sort of study of epigenetics and fuck knows what else that argues that genetic jews pass down genetic attributes, only when mating with another genetic jew, that could be dumbed down to "evil". Add into the mix the usual division kayfabe and legitimate attempts to improve the board and perform your BV function could be argued to be BVs steering the culture of the board, hence manufacturing new rules.

>break.

TLDR; Maybe BVs should aspire to demonstrably be basic function programs, written int he least lines of code, consuming the least amount of systems resources. Show us your source code.

>>13717653

>maybe repost this in breads across shifts this weekend, to obtain input from all ?

Yeah alright anon, just don't wreak my shit for spam BVs.