>>13842053

(Please read from the start)

As for Humbaba being the guardian of the Cedar Forest, this does not mean the place is evil. It only means Humbaba was living in that geographic location. Do not forget anons that the Horned Serpents, just like the ThunderBirds, were scattered all over the world and not concentrated in one location.

“Description

His face is that of a lion. "When he looks at someone, it is the look of death." "Humbaba's roar is a flood, his mouth is death and his breath is fire! He can hear a hundred leagues away any [rustling?] in his forest! Who would go down into his forest!" In various examples, his face is scribed in a single coiling line like that of the coiled entrails of men and beasts, from which omens might be read.”

>> This paragraph is truly amazing because it’s identical to what we read with the Native American’s Mishipeshu (page 748), the Horned Serpent (page 750), the Sisiutl (page 760) and Pazuzu (page 948). His “breath of fire” reminds me of the spear of fire held by Seth (starting page 809) and it also reminds me of the fiery aspect of the Seraphim. The last sentence is disgusting, but I’m wondering if this specific Horned Serpent warrior a.k.a. Humbaba wasn’t injured in the face and was sporting bandages. Just a thought, I might be totally wrong here.

“Another description from Georg Burckhardt's translation of the Epic of Gilgamesh says, "he had the paws of a lion and a body covered in thorny scales; his feet had the claws of a vulture, and on his head were the horns of a wild bull; his tail and phallus each ended in a snake's head.”

>> No need for me to repeat what I said before about Humbaba being similar to the Horned Serpent warriors in other parts of the world. But I would like to point out we’ve got some different details from one tale to another: sometimes the tail is that of a snake, sometimes that of a scorpion. But does it really matter what it truly is? I think the armor of the Horned Serpents was a composite one with stolen tech from other warrior clans and integrated into it. They might have stolen the tail from the scorpion clan armor technology or it might have been originally part of the Horned Serpent armor. If the Horned Serpents needed to steal tech from the Scorpion armor, then this mean not all the Scorpion warriors supported the Horned Serpents. Nergal is starting to look more and more like a traitor to the Scorpion clan and a spy for the Horned Serpent clan. This is how the Horned Serpent armor became Tetramorph or should I say multi-morph, exactly identical situation as the Seraphim. See why Kabbalah adores the Seraphim and the Hamsa? And both are at the core of Judaism. Amazing coincidence! That is…if you believe in coincidence.

As for the phallus being a snake/serpent. I don’t think here it truly represents the animal = snake. Here, I think it’s symbolic. When I take a look at the standard representation of the Baphomet (((they))) worship, apart the hand gesture that is identical to the one Pazuzu makes, there is a Caduceus where his phallus should be.

• Page 953 –

>>13844507

(Please read from the start)

Anons know by now that the Caduceus’ origin is a Beam of Light with electricity around it/swirling around it. I’ve talked about it before a few times already with Gudea’s Libation vase (page 690) and the rosette from Ancient Egypt (page 815) and the symbol of Shamash (page 814). The Caduceus is a distorted, mutated and mutilated representation of that beam of LIGHT which was totally disfigured by later, much later generations.

So here, to represent the phallus of Baphomet or even Humbaba’s as a snake/serpent, it’s not the animal, but electricity. Here, it’s like the snake from the Uraeus. No, this doesn’t mean his phallus sent electrical shocks but I think this MIGHT represents the “spark of life” = that little electrical charge that occurs when the spermatozoid enters the ovule so that a new life starts.

This is not that crazy for an interpretation anons, since this psycho whom is the Evil One, he thought he was God. His followers think he is equal to God and he can “create” life just like God does = God is the giver of Life. Remember anons, these people are sick.

But the phallus shaped like the Caduceus can have a double meaning. According to (((them))), Satan/Baphomet is the one whom carries the LIGHT within him. And since the Caduceus is a symbolic representation of a Beam of Light, (((they))) think Baphomet is the one whom can “bring”/”open” that Beam of Light = portal

This is a short clip from the Avengers: listen carefully to what Bruce/Hulk says about Tony/Iron Man (around minute 1.38 of the clip): “A warm Light for mankind […]. Well, I think that was meant for you.” This is Satanism thrown straight into our faces. Iron Man is the personification of Satan in the comics. Iron Man was created, modeled onto the image of the Evil One. Do you see why Downey Jr. = a pedo (from Epstein flight logs) was picked to play THAT specific role? See now why Downey Jr. is the first star/name of the franchise? (((They))) are turning (((their))) deity = (((their))) prince of Darkness into a superhero for everyone, mostly the children, to admire. (((They))) are making him an important idol loved by all, mostly children. This is deeper and much more sinister than just a pedo playing a role where he is a superhero. There is a far worse and darker agenda to this than the obvious. Be careful whom you follow.

We’ve seen before, in this thread, Esteban from the animation called: The Mysterious cities of Gold (page 702 – video = light shining out of Esteban), carry the Light within him.

• Page 954 –

>>14518869

(Please read from the start)

“The poem Inanna and Shukaletuda (ETCSL 1.3.3) begins with a hymn to Inanna, praising her as the planet Venus. It then introduces Shukaletuda, a gardener who is terrible at his job because he had "pulled them out by the roots and destroyed them". All of his plants die, except for one poplar tree. Shukaletuda prays to the gods for guidance in his work. To his surprise, the goddess Inanna sees his one poplar tree and decides to rest under the shade of its branches. Shukaletuda removes her clothes and rapes Inanna while she sleeps. When the goddess wakes up and realizes she has been violated, she becomes furious and determines to bring her attacker to justice.] In a fit of rage, Inanna unleashes horrible plagues upon the Earth, turning water into blood. Shukaletuda, terrified for his life, pleads his father for advice on how to escape Inanna's wrath. His father tells him to hide in the city, amongst the hordes of people, where he will hopefully blend in. Inanna searches the mountains of the East for her attacker, but is not able to find him. She then releases a series of storms and closes all roads to the city, but is still unable to find Shukaletuda, so she asks Enki to help her find him, threatening to leave her temple in Uruk if he does not. Enki consents and Inanna flies "across the sky like a rainbow". Inanna finally locates Shukaletuda, who vainly attempts to invent excuses for his crime against her. Inanna rejects these excuses and kills him. Theology professor Jeffrey Cooley has cited the story of Shukaletuda as a Sumerian astral myth, arguing that the movements of Inanna in the story correspond with the movements of the planet Venus. He has also stated that, while Shukaletuda was praying to the goddess, he may have been looking toward Venus on the horizon.”

>> This one’s meaning depends on whom Shukaletuda is? I bet it’s not the real name of the person, but an epithet or a descriptive; we will never know the real names, mostly of the Sebetti rulers. There are 3 options for interpretation here, depending on whom Shukaletuda is:

1 - If Shukaletuda is the Evil One, then this story happened before the Cataclysm.

2 - If Shukaletuda is one of the Horned Serpent lieutenants then this might have most probably happened after the Cataclysm as she took many lovers after the death of the Evil One.

3 – There is this possibility of the situation being “à cheval” between before and after the Cataclysm. This might have started with the Evil One being (most probably) the one whom raped Inanna at first when she was just a naïve and innocent lady. She went to get justice in the Sebetti “court” but since the Evil One is the grand master of lies, he might have wiggled his way out of this. The Evil One played with her mind = this is where she might have developed the Stockholm syndrome. She then fell into his trap as he “persuaded” her to get on his side. He took advantage of the already existing cracks between her and her Father and exploited the situation to break their relationship, making her thirsty for power and hating her parents and her brother at the same time. In her wrath she unleashes a calamity = maybe the cataclysm which killed most of the people on Earth = turning water into blood. But she also abandons the Evil One which ends up in his death. She didn’t fight alongside him for some reason; maybe because she was busy stealing the important objects (maybe the “mes”). Or she was afraid.

I don’t know which option it is anons. All are possible. Everything depends on the identity of Shukaletuda, as I’ve said before.

• Page 1 290 –

>>14524665

(Please read from the start)

“The text of the poem Inanna and Bilulu (ETCSL 1.4.4), discovered at Nippur, is badly mutilated and scholars have interpreted it in a number of different ways. The beginning of the poem is mostly destroyed, but seems to be a lament. The intelligible part of the poem describes Inanna pining after her husband Dumuzid, who is in the steppe watching his flocks. Inanna sets out to find him. After this, a large portion of the text is missing. When the story resumes, Inanna is being told that Dumuzid has been murdered. Inanna discovers that the old bandit woman Bilulu and her son Girgire are responsible. She travels along the road to Edenlila and stops at an inn, where she finds the two murderers. Inanna stands on top of a stooland transforms Bilulu into "the waterskin that men carry in the desert", forcing her to pour the funerary libations for Dumuzid.”

>> This text is lacking big time; loads of missing parts, so it’s very tricky and hard to work with it. Here, there is something funny = she cared so much of her husband that she “abandoned” him / allowed him to go to the underworld to replace her – as we’ve talked about before. Chuckles! But she then tracks down the person whom killed him and avenge him. Does any of this make sense to the reader? If she cared so much about her husband then she shouldn’t have let him replace her in the first place. But then, she makes a 180 and switches into the loving and caring wife which wanted to avenge his death.

Since this text is badly damaged, I’m going to be nice and say Main Stream History made a mistake in their interpretation. Anons shouldn’t forget this tale was written by the Evil Clan since the bias towards Inanna is very obvious.

We have a couple of interesting details though:

1 – The story is told by the Evil Clan as a “murder” = the Evil One was murdered. Meaning he didn’t have a “normal” death but was killed by someone evil. It’s the same rhetoric used when they were justifying the murder of Osiris by Seth = same ideology of making the good look bad and the bad look good. Here, (((they))) are calling the elimination of the Evil One by the warriors of the Light a murder. That’s (((their))) side of the story.

2 – Somehow, the Evil Lady managed to identify the murderer of her beloved husband (whom she let die in her place and abandoned him) as being a WOMEN = whom is portrayed as a thief with a son. Again, this is how the Evil Clan tell (((their))) story, (((their))) view. Then Inanna unleashed the Divine punishment on Earth = Cataclysm as punishment for the death of her husband; as we talked about before.

Whom is this woman? = it’s Neith, the Queen of queens.Whom is the son of this woman? = the Crown Prince, still very young, as I’ve said before. Why is this woman = Neith called a THIEF? = because in her mind, in her twisted, perverted mind, the Evil Lady think the throne of Heaven is rightfully hers. And it’s the warriors of the Light, with the Queen of queens as their leader whom defended the throne and its rightful heir = the Crown Prince. But for the Evil Lady, the warriors of the Light along with Neith STOLE what is rightfully hers = the throne. This is why (((they))) said in this story that a thief, a female thief, killed Inanna’s husband.

• Page 1 291 –

>>14524666

(Please read from the start)

This tale is a confirmation of what we read about Isis fleeing with Horus from Seth and his followers. Here, Inanna went after both mother and child and “supposedly punished” the murder of her beloved husband. This is (((their))) version of the events = Inanna is always the winner, she always come on top, she never loses. But we know, that there was a confrontation between Neith and the Evil Lady which lasted some time. So no….Inanna didn’t punish the one whom killed her husband in one swift strike.

But (((they))) don’t paint (((their))) matriarch in a bad light, so (((they))) distorted the truth and said that Inanna punished the culprit. Just to satisfy (((their))) ego. What is amazing here is that (((they))) lied and (((they))) are the first ones to believe in this lie. (((They))) rather live in fantasy, in illusion than face the hard, bitter reality of (((their))) queen and mother of demons being defeated by the warriors of the Light. Isn’t this what we keep on seeing in many Hollywood movies or productions, like the series called Lucifer (page 1 153)? We saw there, the Archangel Michael kneeling, about to be decapitated by Lucifer. But, the truth is the other way around and it was Lucifer whom got his head chopped off by most probably the Archangel Michael. Hasn’t anyone, noticed how many MIKE or MICHAEL we have around Potus and in the fight against the Bloodlines? You think this is all a coincidence. These people, including Potus, were all selected by the Light to play a specific part in all that is taking place right now.

In most of the stories about Inanna so far, we see her use some type of transportation. Sometimes it’s said directly, but sometimes it’s insinuated, that this transportation could fly. Sometimes the reader gets the impression she has boarded something like a plane. Sometimes you get the impression she is using her personal Jet suit armor to fly. Regardless of what she used, you can always detect this idea of FLIGHT being present under the surface of these stories about Inanna, at least most of them anyway.

“Descent into the underworld

Two different versions of the story of Inanna/Ishtar's descent into the underworld have survived: a Sumerian version dating to the Third Dynasty of Ur (circa 2112 BC – 2004 BC) (ETCSL 1.4.1) and a clearly derivative Akkadian version from the early second millennium BC. The Sumerian version of the story is nearly three times the length of the later Akkadian version and contains much greater detail.”

>> I’m personally not interested in the story of the “Descent into the underworld” because it never brought anything new. It didn’t bring anything that I already didn’t know through archaeology. I’m going to let anons, read it and make tiny few comments. The events told happened mostly after the coup failed.

• Page 1 292 –

>>14524669

(Please read from the start)

“Sumerian version

In Sumerian religion, the Kur was conceived of as a dark, dreary cavern located deep underground; life there was envisioned as "a shadowy version of life on earth". It was ruled by Inanna's sister, the goddess Ereshkigal. Before leaving, Inanna instructs her minister and servant Ninshubur to plead with the deities Enlil, Nanna, Anu, and Enki to rescue her if she does not return after three days. The laws of the underworld dictate that, with the exception of appointed messengers, those who enter it may never leave. Inanna dresses elaborately for the visit; she wears a turban, wig, lapis lazuli necklace, beads upon her breast, the 'pala dress' (the ladyship garment), mascara, a pectoral, and golden ring, and holds a lapis lazuli measuring rod. Each garment is a representation of a powerful me she possesses.

Inanna pounds on the gates of the underworld, demanding to be let in. The gatekeeper Neti asks her why she has come and Inanna replies that she wishes to attend the funeral rites of Gugalanna, the "husband of my elder sister Ereshkigal". Neti reports this to Ereshkigal, who tells him: "Bolt the seven gates of the underworld. Then, one by one, open each gate a crack. Let Inanna enter. As she enters, remove her royal garments." Perhaps Inanna's garments, unsuitable for a funeral, along with Inanna's haughty behavior, make Ereshkigal suspicious. Following Ereshkigal's instructions, Neti tells Inanna she may enter the first gate of the underworld, but she must hand over her lapis lazuli measuring rod. She asks why, and is told, "It is just the ways of the underworld." She obliges and passes through. Inanna passes through a total of seven gates, at each one removing a piece of clothing or jewelry she had been wearing at the start of her journey, thus stripping her of her power. When she arrives in front of her sister, she is naked.

After she had crouched down and had her clothes removed, they were carried away. Then she made her sister Erec-ki-gala rise from her throne, and instead she sat on her throne. The Anna, the seven judges, rendered their decision against her. They looked at her – it was the look of death. They spoke to her – it was the speech of anger. They shouted at her – it was the shout of heavy guilt. The afflicted woman was turned into a corpse. And the corpse was hung on a hook.”

>> The garments Inanna wore are most probably had something to do with her multi-morph armor, mostly the blasters; compare with the story of Humbaba (starting page 951) and how he was tricked by Gilgamesh to remove slowly the 7 auras he had. The 7 gates and the 7 judges are the Sebetti rulers and their territories. But since the Evil Couple are each one Sebetti and the King of kings was murdered, so I think there is something wrong with the text here. Or they might be simply indicating that the Evil Lady was being judged in the Sebetti court by the remaining Sebetti rulers. Just take a look how the other Sebetti rulers reacted towards the Evil Lady: they shouted at her, they were speaking with anger and they had the look of death in their eyes towards her. This is understandable looking at the scope of her crimes; apart the incest, being a pedovore, she also plotted to kill her own Father to take the throne of Heaven and she literally blew up the entire planet = the Cataclysm. If all of this didn’t EARN her the anger of the other Sebetti rulers then I don’t know what will; and she EARNED the death sentence.

• Page 1 293 –

>>14529625

(Please read from the start)

“Three days and three nights pass, and Ninshubur, following instructions, goes to the temples of Enlil, Nanna, An, and Enki, and pleads with each of them to rescue Inanna. The first three deities refuse, saying Inanna's fate is her own fault, but Enki is deeply troubled and agrees to help. He creates two sexless figures named gala-tura and the kur-jara from the dirt under the fingernails of two of his fingers. He instructs them to appease Ereshkigal and, when she asks them what they want, ask for the corpse of Inanna, which they must sprinkle with the food and water of life. When they come before Ereshkigal, she is in agony like a woman giving birth. She offers them whatever they want, including life-giving rivers of water and fields of grain, if they can relieve her, but they refuse all of her offers and ask only for Inanna's corpse. The gala-tura and the kur-jara sprinkle Inanna's corpse with the food and water of life and revive her. Galla demons sent by Ereshkigal follow Inanna out of the underworld, insisting that someone else must be taken to the underworld as Inanna's replacement. They first come upon Ninshubur and attempt to take her, but Inanna stops them, insisting that Ninshubur is her loyal servant and that she had rightfully mourned for her while she was in the underworld. They next come upon Shara, Inanna's beautician, who is still in mourning. The demons attempt to take him, but Inanna insists that they may not, because he had also mourned for her. The third person they come upon is Lulal, who is also in mourning. The demons try to take him, but Inanna stops them once again.”

>> Sprinkling the body of Inanna with the food and water of life means human blood and human flesh = remember these are pedovores.

“Finally, they come upon Dumuzid, Inanna's husband. Despite Inanna's fate, and in contrast to the other individuals who were properly mourning her, Dumuzid is lavishly clothed and resting beneath a tree, or upon her throne, entertained by slave-girls. Inanna, displeased, decrees that the galla shall take him. The galla then drag Dumuzid down to the underworld. Another text known as Dumuzid's Dream (ETCSL 1.4.3) describes Dumuzid's repeated attempts to evade capture by the galla demons, an effort in which he is aided by the sun-god Utu.”

>> Please take a look anons at the imprint of the Sumerian Cyclinder Seal showing Dumuzid supposedly being tortured by the Galla. Look closely to these Galla: Some are holding staffs, which some have a snake shape = electricity weapon. One is clearly standing on a Feline (pointing to land/country/kingdom) while holding what looks like weapon number 6 from the bronze Plaque of the Hells – page 965. He is also sporting a triple horned crown, which could indicate he belongs to one of the horned Sebetti clans. Was this hat worn by some of the multi-morphs? We also have a cuffed person whom is also wearing a triple horned crown. The most mysterious object is what looks like a grid pattern (in black); I have no idea what that could be.

What is clear here anons, is the presence of persons wearing the triple horned crown. One is standing on a Feline indicating they come from kingdom/land which had it as heraldic animal as a Lion = same thing we see with Inanna (but over there, (((they))) told us the Lion is one of her symbols, which is a total lie). The other person wearing a triple horned crown has restraints = cuffs on both his hands and feet. This is clearly a prisoner here. As for the grid pattern, it could be a cage of some sort and a person is being put in it….maybe a prison cell, I don’t know.

What I know, this scene is not exactly what we are being told it is. This is not simply Dumuzid being captured or tortured by the Galla. There is more than one prisoner here and there are more than one person wearing a triple horned crown. This is not what we think it is, there is more going on here than what is said.

• Page 1 294 –