>>14502121

(Please read from the start)

Also the Sukkal of Enki, greeted the Evil Lady as if he was expecting her to come and then he offered her food and drink. Enki got drunk. Doesn’t it sound like a reception being held at the palace of Enki? Remember how there was a reception at the palace in the epic of Atra-Hasis?

So after Enki “sobers up” he gets furious when his Sukkal informs him that he had “given” the “mes” to the Evil Lady and he asks “monsters” = ThunderBirds and the rest of the Light warriors, to bring back the stolen “mes”. Remember anons, such tales are written by the Evil clan, so they call the warriors of the Light, mostly the ThunderBirds as monsters and evil beings.

Here, they said Inanna’s Sukkal, Ninshubur, was the one whom fended off ALL of the monsters sent by Enki. I don’t think this is correct. I think here, they are point that it’s Inanna’s “servants”/”followers” = Horned Serpents whom faced the ThunderBirds and a battle ensued.

This is one lame ending for Enki’s fury, don’t you think anons? Don’t you find anything ODD by how Enki, suddenly “reverted” from attacking the Evil Lady, reconciles with her and politely bid her farewell? Really now, whom’s leg are you trying to pull here? No reason whatsoever is given as to why this 180 degrees change occurred. Also no explanations or details given as well as no narration shedding light on the events. If you listen to what the Evil Clan wrote here; it’s like one day Enki work up and tada… decided to be nice to the Evil Lady.

We know the Evil Lady didn’t keep the “stolen important objects” because we just saw a few pages ago, when taking a look at the Anzu bird, that at least ONE ThunderBird, managed to “take back” these special objects (or some of them) and hid them somewhere on a mountain top around the world, before he was “apparently” killed by a Horned Serpent. So how do I explain this lame ending in this tale and Enki’s changed attitude? Well, the one whom wrote this was from the Evil Clan and we know (((they))) are arrogant and won’t admit (((their))) own mistakes and sins but project them onto others. Same goes for (((their))) defeat: (((they))) are unwilling to admit the ThunderBirds kicked (((their))) evil asses and took back those “special, important objects”. So in order to “disguise” (((their))) humiliating defeat = since Inanna herself was defeated, (((they))) applied make-up on the story and made it sound like Enki had a change of heart and he became sweet and nice = control of the narrative.

This is probably one of the first ever MEDIA manipulation that happened in History anons. Where do you think modern days MSM got their tactics from? This has started LONG ago, longer than any of you even realize. And this tale is a sample of how it used to happen back in Mesopotamia, they used to “twist and spin the narrative. Remember how (((they))) project Osiris as evil and Seth as good in Ancient Egypt? Tha’ts anoter attempt to contro the narrative.

This tale does NOT represent the “readiness of Inanna of becoming her Queen of Heaven”. This represents her greed of taking the place of the Queen of queens = greed for power.

• Page 1 283 –

>>14507901

(Please read from the start)

“The poem Inanna Takes Command of Heaven is an extremely fragmentary, but important, account of Inanna's conquest of the Eanna temple in Uruk. It begins with a conversation between Inanna and her brother Utu in which Inanna laments that the Eanna temple is not within their domain and resolves to claim it as her own. The text becomes increasingly fragmentary at this point in the narrative, but appears to describe her difficult passage through a marshland to reach the temple while a fisherman instructs her on which route is best to take. Ultimately, Inanna reaches her father An, who is shocked by her arrogance, but nevertheless concedes that she has succeeded and that the temple is now her domain. The text ends with a hymn expounding Inanna's greatness. This myth may represent an eclipse in the authority of the priests of An in Uruk and a transfer of power to the priests of Inanna.”

>> No, this doesn’t represent the transfer of power from the priests of An to the priests of Inanna. This is a projection of what happened back then.

Yes, everything started with a conversation between the Evil Lady and the Evil One, whom seems to be her brother. I think the temple of Eanna represents the Royal Palace of the King of kings or a projection of it in this story at least. In this conversation, she told = admitted, confessed to her brother that she would like to make the throne of Heaven hers.

The next section is not complete, we have fragments from it, so we gotta be extra careful on the meaning of it all. The fisherman might be our fish men which were the Spiritual Healers – I’ve talked about them many times and revisited the subject from page 1 159 to page 1 161. Inanna talked to one at least and he gave her advice/instructions.

Here it’s difficult to see through, mostly that we have fragments of the text. The situation with the Fish man = Spiritual Healer, is unclear. Was he a traitor to the King of kings and had switched sides? Was the Fish man “tricked” to give her the information just like was Enki when she stole the “mes” from him? Did he think she was an innocent young lady, asking for advice and doesn’t have any ulterior motives in her request? = this last idea reminds me of how Voldemort tricked one of the professors of the school to tell her about the Horcruxes. There are many possibilities as to what happened back then and unfortunately, we only have fragments of the text.

She had to cross a “marshland” to reach the TEMPLE. Then it’s said that a fisherman instructed her on which road to take best. Did she reach the temple first and she met the fisherman there? Or did she meet the fisherman first whom guided her to the temple? It’s unclear and it’s ambiguous because it’s fragmentary. From the sound of it, one of the possibilities is that TEMPLE is probably her destination; or at least one of her destinations.

• Page 1 284 –

>>14507911

(Please read from the start)

They tell us that in the end, she managed to reach her FATHER. This means she got, at the end = finally, to the Royal Palace. So was she seeking an audience with the King of kings and the Fish man got her an audience with her Father? Did the Fish man play the role of intermediary between Father and daughter? It’s undetermined because the tale is fragmentary.

I love it when they said that An is “shocked” by her “arrogance”. I bet he was. She transformed from a naïve, innocent, sweet daughter, to a greedy, evil and arrogant one. That would shock any father, any parent. This sentence is another way of saying that: The Evil Lady showed her true face, her true colors to her Father. Do you remember how Inanna shrieked when the Cataclysm started and regretted that she have said all of those evil things in the Assembly of the Gods? I wonder if this is not when she spate all of those nasty things to her Father mostly, just a short while before the Coup was put into motion = the big Day for the coup plotters.

What did Inanna succeed in? How did the TEMPLE came to be under her domain? What is the TEMPLE? Unfortunately, we don’t have the answer for all of this. I suspect the Temple might be the Royal Palace, but, again, it’s not confirmed.

“Inanna briefly appears at the beginning and end of the epic poem Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta (ETCSL 1.8.2.3). The epic deals with a rivalry between the cities of Uruk and Aratta. Enmerkar, the king of Uruk, wishes to adorn his city with jewels and precious metals, but cannot do so because such minerals are only found in Aratta and, since trade does not yet exist, the resources are not available to him. Inanna, who is the patron goddess of both cities, appears to Enmerkar at the beginning of the poem and tells him that she favors Uruk over Aratta. She instructs Enmerkar to send a messenger to the lord of Aratta to ask for the resources Uruk needs. The majority of the epic revolves around a great contest between the two kings over Inanna's favor. Inanna reappears at the end of the poem to resolve the conflict by telling Enmerkar to establish trade between his city and Aratta.

>> This one is very tricky to understand. Are they talking really about these 2 City-States after the Cataclysm? Or are they talking in this tale about 2 City-States before the Cataclysm? I have no idea of figuring out this one.

“Justice myths

Inanna and her brother Utu were regarded as the dispensers of divine justice, a role which Inanna exemplifies in several of her myths. Inanna and Ebih (ETCSL 1.3.2), otherwise known as Goddess of the Fearsome Divine Powers, is a 184-line poem written by the Akkadian poet Enheduanna describing Inanna's confrontation with Mount Ebih, a mountain in the Zagros mountain range. The poem begins with an introductory hymn praising Inanna. The goddess journeys all over the entire world, until she comes across Mount Ebih and becomes infuriated by its glorious might and natural beauty, considering its very existence as an outright affront to her own authority. She rails at Mount Ebih, shouting:

Mountain, because of your elevation, because of your height,

Because of your goodness, because of your beauty,

Because you wore a holy garment,

Because An organized(?) you,

Because you did not bring (your) nose close to the ground,

Because you did not press (your) lips in the dust.”

• Page 1 285 –