>>13751192

(Please read from the start)

>> Did anyone notice how “recent” the interpretations (= all of them) are about the Seraphim in Judaism? What happened to the older “knowledge” and “tradition” about them? For all of these centuries what happened to the earliest accounts about the Seraphim? Why are the Bloodlines showing an attachment towards the Seraphim? Why are (((they))) fond of them? Is it just me or it’s obvious to everyone reading that the Seraphim are of high importance to the Bloodlines? Why does it give me the impression (((they))) value the seraphim the same way the value the Hamsa? Both have the same smell for me.

“In Christianity

Medieval Christian theology places seraphim in the highest choir of the angelic hierarchy. They are the caretakers of God's throne, continuously singing "holy, holy, holy". Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite in his Celestial Hierarchy (vii), drew upon the Book of Isaiah in fixing the fiery nature of seraphim in the medieval imagination. Seraphim in his view helped the Deity maintain perfect order and are not limited to chanting the trisagion. Taking his cue as well from writings in the Rabbinic tradition, the author gave an etymology for the Seraphim as "those who kindle or make hot".”

>> I have 2 problems with what is said here: 1 - Many centuries passed since the birth of Christianity till the Medieval Times. 2 – It’s based on the writing of the Rabbinic tradition, as in some Rabbis gather, discuss things, come to their own conclusions and it’s passed down to later generation; then the Church comes and picks up what the Rabbi’s conclusion is. This was never an original part of Christianity. Yes ANGELS in general do exist from the get go in Christianity, but not about the Seraphim and mostly not the DETAILS and information about them. Only God knows if the information we’ve got nowadays about them (transmitted to us) is authentic or not. I wonder how many times it was manipulated and the texts changed. Mostly that this was introduced into Christianity centuries later via Judaism; doesn’t this sound like INFILTRATION? I’m starting to dislike what I’m reading about them.

“The name seraphim clearly indicates their ceaseless and eternal revolution about Divine Principles, their heat and keenness, the exuberance of their intense, perpetual, tireless activity, and their elevative and energetic assimilation of those below, kindling them and firing them to their own heat, and wholly purifying them by a burning and all-consuming flame; and by the unhidden, unquenchable, changeless, radiant and enlightening power, dispelling and destroying the shadows of darkness.

Origen wrote in On First Principles that the Seraphim, in the Book of Isaiah, are the physical representation of the Christ and the Holy Spirit. His rationale comes from the idea that nothing "can wholly know the beginnings of all things and the ends of the universe" aside from God. Origen concludes this section in writing about the Seraphim as beings that have the knowledge of God revealed to them which elevates the role of the Seraphim to divine levels:”

• Page 905 –

>>13751263

(Please read from the start)

“Nevertheless whatever it is that these powers may have learned through the revelation of the Son of God and of the Holy Spirit-and they will certainly be able to acquire a great deal of knowledge, and the higher ones much more than the lower-still it is impossible for them to comprehend everything; for it is written, 'The more part of God's works are secret.

This quote suggests that Origen believed the Seraphim are revealed this knowledge because of their anointed status as Son of God and the Holy Spirit. He was later criticized for making such claims and labeled a heretic by the Christian church. However, his theory about the Seraphim, as referred to in Isaiah, would be reflected in other early Christian literature, as well as early Christian belief through the second century.”

>> These are the words and thoughts of ONE person anons so be careful with the information provided, mostly when you check his background: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origen

His writings are…how should I say it? = controversial, so handle with extreme care if you are going down this tunnel.

“Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologiae offers a description of the nature of seraphim:

The name "Seraphim" does not come from charity only, but from the excess of charity, expressed by the word ardor or fire. Hence Dionysius (Coel. Hier. vii) expounds the name "Seraphim" according to the properties of fire, containing an excess of heat. Now in fire we may consider three things.

First, the movement which is upwards and continuous. This signifies that they are borne inflexibly towards God.

Secondly, the active force which is "heat," which is not found in fire simply, but exists with a certain sharpness, as being of most penetrating action, and reaching even to the smallest things, and as it were, with superabundant fervor; whereby is signified the action of these angels, exercised powerfully upon those who are subject to them, rousing them to a like fervor, and cleansing them wholly by their heat.

Thirdly we consider in fire the quality of clarity, or brightness; which signifies that these angels have in themselves an inextinguishable light, and that they also perfectly enlighten others.”

>> Notice the choice of words anons? So for the anons interested in this = handle with precautions.

“The seraphim took on a mystic role in Giovanni Pico della Mirandola's Oration on the Dignity of Man (1487), the epitome of Renaissance humanism. Pico took the fiery Seraphim—"they burn with the fire of charity"—as the highest models of human aspiration: "impatient of any second place, let us emulate dignity and glory. And, if we will it, we shall be inferior to them in nothing", the young Pico announced, in the first flush of optimistic confidence in the human capacity that is the coinage of the Renaissance. "In the light of intelligence, meditating upon the Creator in His work, and the work in its Creator, we shall be resplendent with the light of the Cherubim. If we burn with love for the Creator only, his consuming fire will quickly transform us into the flaming likeness of the Seraphim."

• Page 906 –

>>13751286

(Please read from the start)

“Bonaventure, a Franciscan theologian who was a contemporary of Aquinas, uses the six wings of the seraph as an important analogical construct in his mystical work The Journey of the Mind to God.

Christian theology developed an idea of seraphim as beings of pure light who enjoy direct communication with God.

In Islam

Seraphim (Sarufiyyun or Musharifin) are mentioned in a hadith from Al-Tirmidhi, about a conversation between Muhammad and God, during the Night Journey, concerning what is between the Heavens and the earth, often interpreted as a reference to the "Exalted assembly" disputing the creation of Adam in Surah 38:69. Apart from that, Seraphim rarely appear in Islam. Sometimes, specific archangels, like Jibrāʾīl and Israfil, are identified as Seraphim. Robert Southey also noted an Islamic narration about Angels commanded to prostrate before Adam, whereupon Iblis refused as he boasted about himself being a Seraph created from celestial fire, more excellent than Adam.

In culture

[…]”

>> So in Islam Iblis = the Devil was a seraph whom refused to “bow” to Adam and he boasted about himself being created from the celestial fire. Is the celestial fire the Sun? If the Winged warriors came out from the Sun as a Stargate, does this mean the Sun = fire ball, gave birth to them in a metaphoric way/meaning? We also know that there were many Seraphim and that Iblis was just ONE of them.

I want to talk a bit about the images of the Seraphim I’ve been attaching to the different pages about them. If anons have noticed, in some, the seraph is holding a spear or a staff – mostly 2 staffs like our Staff-God from the Andean region. In some, Eyes are places on different parts of the body (including the forehead) or simply covering the seraph entirely like what we see in page 904. Is this the true origin of the EYE the Bloodline and their minions are so fond of? Are the multiple EYES of the seraph angel the origin of the EYE symbol of the Bloodlines? We already know the Kabbalah was fond of the seraph and had an attachment to them. So why not? It’s one of the many possibilities.

• Page 907 –