>>14290437

(Please read from the start)

I’ve been thinking a lot about the high concentration of Griffin iconography in the Andean Region, so I ended up wondering if I cannot pick up a pattern from it. What do I mean here? Well, if the concentration of Griffin iconography in one place means there is a Royal, can I use this to find the other royals = the other Sebettis? Can I find the other Sebettis by identifying the Griffin hot spots?

The first place which came to my mind with a rather good concentration of Griffins in that geographic location is actually Ancient Egypt. To make it even better the iconography of the Griffin started there ever since pre-dynastic times (example 2 dogs palette) and it lasted all the way till the Hellenistic times. And we do have a Royal family member in Ancient Egypt = Neith. So far, we have 2 geographical spots with a concentration of Griffins and a Sebetti was found in each of these locations.

An idea is also floating in my head about the Griffin being the origin or the early form of the Sphinx. This possibility includes the Great Sphinx of Giza which is obviously re-carved, mostly the head. What if the original head of the Sphinx was that of an Eagle and not a Lion as man theorized. This needs further digging of course.

Well, maybe despite reading all that’ve written and despite all the artifacts I’ve provided, some readers are still not convinced with the existence of the Sebetti and their elite warriors. I’m going to provide to anon some additional artifacts to be considered as proof.

Anons can do the digs on these on their own if they are interested in them. I understand why the Main Stream History doesn’t like to bring such artifacts up for the public to see and study. But I’ve been wondering: why the Alternative History never considers such artifacts when they are supposedly trying to dig the truth about the Sphinx and the Pyramids of Giza and other mysteries worldwide?

I will be attaching with this page a series of 5 Ostraca. Take a very, very good look what’s on the Ostraca.

Now can anyone please explain what a LIZARD (maybe snake) looking person, standing upright, is doing by driving a chariot? What was an upright standing Feline doing carrying a basket and tending to some ducks? Why what looks like to be a mouse, is sitting on a chair, draped in a tunic waist down, smelling a lotus flower and holding something else in her right hand? Why there seems to be a roasted chicken or a roasted turkey in front of it as if it was having a meal? Why is there a Feline standing upright, holding a fan and a staff in front of the sitting mouse? I have no idea what a MOUSE can represent here; maybe a vassal clan or maybe it’s a symbolic representation of a specific type of person like what we have seen with the Aquatic Healers or the Spider Oracles. That’s one fine Birdman in the next Ostracon, isn’t it? In the last Ostracon you see, there is a mouse holding a staff whom is standing upright, behind him there is a chair. In front of him, there is a human = person whom seem to being beaten or subdued by the Feline standing upright behind him. Is this a “natural” behavior of animals anons? Are these “personas” we see on these Ostraca real animal….or are they symbolic representations of humans through their respective heraldic animals?

• Page 1 176 –

>>14297388

(Please read from the start)

I still have one Ostracon to show you. We have another “meal” scene here. Is it a Feline or a mouse sitting, wearing a tunic and holding a cup up? What is it holding? Is that a feather or is it fish bones? Maybe something else? I don’t know. The Feline is still standing upright holding that fan in front of the seated animal: you know, since it’s very hot in Ancient Egypt, someone gotta make sure the higher ups are cool and not suffocating from the heat. The Feline is also holding something else in his other hand. Between them, there is an animal: it’s either a scorpion or some type of sea food like a lobster. But since lobsters don’t have pointy tails like that, could this be a prawn? It doesn’t have claws for it to be a scorpion and it looks like it’s meal time since the seated animal is holding his cup up….so it’s gotta be some type of aquatic type of food he is having.

Next I have a wonderful series of papyri fragments for anons to see.

On the first one we clearly see a mouse sitting on a chair, holding a cup up while it looks like 2 Felines are “attending” to its needs. While in the second one we see a mouse being carried by a Feline standing upright and there is a fan, partially, behind them. The third is another “meal” scene or should I say banquet scene with various animals tending to the seated one. Is this a normal behavior for animals? Or they look and behave just like humans do?

The last papyrus is a long strip where we can see various animals standing upright with human behavior. This one dates back from the Ramesside period, so it’s from a late period. We have loads of Sebetti clan heraldic animals here anons: from the Antelope and the Feline playing chess together, to the Wolf and more Felines tending to various tasks. This is truly a marvelous piece.

I can assure you, this is no ancient comic book, no cartoons and definitely not Mickey Mouse from Disney. This is a symbolic representation of the Sebetti Clan members either on Ostracon or on papyrus fragments. It’s a shame we’ve got bits and pieces of them, as in they were damaged and we don’t have them in good shape.

I bet neither the Mains Stream History nor the Alternative History will ever tell you about these little marvels. If they did, it would bring loads of curious eyes and a mountain of questions will rise, blowing a huge hole into the narrative (((they))) so carefully woven for us for centuries now. It will uncover the truth about the History of Mankind and where we really come from, including putting a SPOTLIGHT on the CRIMES (((they))) committed against humanity.

I guess this gotta do it now for Ancient Egypt, right? This should be enough proofs for anons about the Sebetti warriors in Ancient Egypt. The Griffin (and his new form the Sphinx) in Ancient Egypt indicates the presence of a member of the Royal family = a Sebetti ruler, which is none other than Neith.

• Page 1 177 –

>>14297404

(Please read from the start)

I did find a third spot where there is a concentration of the Griffin iconography along with a cocktail of the Sebetti warriors. But before I show anons the artifacts and the geographic location, I need to get out of this tunnel = rewind to page 958, when I was taking a look at Lamashtu. I went down that digging tunnel all the way down, didn’t I? Now, I’m going to rewind, climb back up and go down another tunnel, that tunnel will eventually connect to where I stopped with the Griffin iconography concentration point number 3 as in connect to page 1 177.

In page 958, while taking a look at Lamashtu, there was one last point that was not checked and we will be doing that right now. I have to do this before I reveal the third Griffin concentration location point to anons. It’s about Lilith: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilith

This is going to be LONG anons.

“Lilith (/ˈlɪlɪθ/; Hebrew: לִילִית‎ Lîlîṯ) is a demonic figure in Judeo-Christian mythology, supposedly the primordial she-demon and alternately first wife of Adam. She is first mentioned in Biblical Hebrew in Isaiah 34:14, and later in Late Antiquity in Mandaean Gnosticism mythology and Jewish mythology sources from 500 CE onwards. Lilith appears in historiolas (incantations incorporating a short mythic story) in various concepts and localities that give partial descriptions of her. She is mentioned in the Babylonian Talmud (Eruvin 100b, Niddah 24b, Shabbat 151b, Baba Bathra 73a), in the Book of Adam and Eve as Adam's first wife, and in the Zohar Leviticus 19a as "a hot fiery female who first cohabited with man.”

>> Yup! This is the MOTHER of ALL DEMONS and she is found in Judaism and of course the Kabbalah. It’s amazing how acknowledgeable they are in Judaism when it comes to demons, isn’t it? ^_^

“Lilith perhaps originated from an earlier class of female demons (lilû, lilîtu, and (w)ardat lilî) in the ancient Mesopotamian religion, found in cuneiform texts of Sumer, Assyria, and Babylonia.”

>> Oh how cute of (((them)))! (((They))) used the word “perhaps” here. So sweet to sugar coat things for the Sheep! Let me get this straight: Judaism copied and edited several times, to fit (((their))) twisted narrative, many ancient stories, myths and even knowledge from the different civilizations of Mesopotamia, but this one…it “perhaps” originated from that region. There are no “perhaps” here anons.

I do like the sentence: “a hot fiery female who first cohabited with man”. See, they didn’t say ADAM, but man, A MAN, as in a single MAN. She was hot fiery…this makes me think of the fiery weapon the Evil Couple uses and in the same time, it making me think of the perverted sexual relationship the Evil Couple had.

• Page 1 178 –

>>14297437

(Please read from the start)

Do you remember in pages 960 - 961, on the bronze Plaque of the Hells, Lamashtu is depicted coming down on a Kuphar from the Armenian plateau and settled in Mesopotamia? Why did (((they))) associate Lamashtu and Lilith together on page 958? Did (((they))) know Lilith and Lamashtu were one and the same? That she survived by boarding the Ark, then it rested on Mt Ararat? And when the waters retreated all the way, she came down with her offspring downstream Euphrates River and settled at least for some time in Mesopotamia? It’s looking that way anons, it’s looking that way. Unless I find somewhere else a stronger piece of evidence, I think Lamashtu and Lilith are one and the same….and…they both are the Evil Lady. This is why Lilith is considered the MOTHER of ALL DEMONS. Because she is the one whom had a forbidden relationship with the Evil One, and then got pregnant to give birth to his offspring. I’m repeating: unless I find stronger proof, then I think Lilith = Lamashtu are none other than the Evil Lady I’ve been talking about in this thread.

“Lilith continues to serve as source material in modern Western culture, literature, occultism, fantasy, and horror.”

>> Pardon me but what the ~*^#$$# does this mean? Did she win Miss Universe pageant and became so popular till this day? Oh come on! We know how it works in marketing, entertainment and the brainwashing turning her into an icon.

“History

In some Jewish folklore, such as the satiric Alphabet of Sirach (c. AD 700–1000), Lilith appears as Adam's first wife, who was created at the same time (Rosh Hashanah) and from the same clay as Adam – compare Genesis 1:27 (this contrasts with Eve, who was created from one of Adam's ribs). The legend of Lilith developed extensively during the Middle Ages, in the tradition of Aggadah, the Zohar, and Jewish mysticism. For example, in the 11th-century writings of Isaac ben Jacob ha-Cohen, Lilith left Adam after she refused to become subservient to him and then would not return to the Garden of Eden after she had coupled with the archangel Samael.”

>> Look at the date anons = in the Middle Ages, that’s pretty darn late as a date…so what happened for many “centuries” to Lilith? Where was she all of this time before the Middle Ages? And of all places, she had to appear in Jewish Folklore which has Hellenistic influence in it (face palm).

I see this in a different way. Eve was the Evil Lady before she turned and became evil. She was this naïve, young princess whom was seduced by the Serpent and she ate from the forbidden fruit. When she did that, she turned into Lilith and became the mother of all monsters, literally. It’s also funny how we can see traces of the feminist mvt here when it’s said: “she refused to become subservient to him (aka Adam). Talking about Adam, I think he represents the Evil One before his illness showed up. When it did, he turned into the Serpent and seduced Eve into eating the forbidden fruit. The Garden of Eden is obviously Atlantis.

I don’t think it’s Adam she refused to “submit” to, but it’s the King of kings. Don’t forget there was a coup to take over the throne by the plotters and Lilith fits perfectly in that group. As for her being the lover of Archangel Samael…this is referring to her forbidden sexual relationship with the Evil One. I’ve been talking a lot about all of this anons and here, the same thing is said.

• Page 1 179 –

>>14297454

(Please read from the start)

“Interpretations of Lilith found in later Jewish materials are plentiful, but little information has survived relating to the Sumerian, Akkadian, Assyrian and Babylonian view of this class of demons. While researchers almost universally agree that a connection exists, recent scholarship has disputed the relevance of two sources previously used to connect the Jewish lilith to an Akkadian lilītu – the Gilgamesh appendix and the Arslan Tash amulets. (see below for discussion of these two problematic sources) "Other scholars, such as Lowell K. Handy, agree that Lilith derives from Mesopotamian demons but argue against finding evidence of the Hebrew Lilith in many of the epigraphical and artifactual sources frequently cited as such (e.g., the Sumerian Gilgamesh fragment, the Sumerian incantation from Arshlan-Tash)."

>> Has anyone read a more ambiguous paragraph than this one? Is there or isn’t there a connection to the ancient Mesopotamian cultures? The bronze Plaque of the Hell is a good proof that a mother of demons = Lamashtu came down the Euphrates from the Armenian Plateau where the Ark rested. For me the chances are extremely high Lamashtu and Lilith are one and the same but the Main Stream Historians and the Jews don’t want anyone to make the connection between them and trace it all back to Mt. Ararat because (((they))) do not want to reveal the existence of the Ark on that mountain because….can you guess why? I’ve hinted for the reason many times already. Keep on working on this for now.

“In Hebrew-language texts, the term lilith or lilit (translated as "night creatures", "night monster", "night hag", or "screech owl") first occurs in a list of animals in Isaiah 34, either in singular or plural form according to variations in the earliest manuscripts. The Isaiah 34:14 Lilith reference does not appear in most common Bible translations such as KJV and NIV. Commentators and interpreters often envision the figure of Lilith as a dangerous demon of the night, who is sexually wanton, and who steals babies in the darkness. In the Dead Sea Scrolls 4Q510-511, the term first occurs in a list of monsters. Jewish magical inscriptions on bowls and amulets from the 6th century AD onwards identify Lilith as a female demon and provide the first visual depictions of her.”

>> Look what the translation means, it’s amazing: “night creature, night hag, night monster or screech owl”. Has anyone ever wondered why the Bible isn’t a uniform book but we have various versions of it where bits and parts were added, removed or altered? I see it as everyone “puts his own version of the Bible according to their own views and opinions”. But where is the REAL, AUTHENTIC Bible in all of this? I would like to get my hands on it and read it.

Lilith, just like Pazuzu and Lamashtu, likes to steal babies in the darkness….how many Light warriors we have, like Bes and the others, whom used to protect pregnant ladies and children, including babies? Things are starting to come really nicely together. We have a new detail when it comes to Lilith = her sexual lust…seem she had loads of perverted sexual cravings which were hard for her to control. For me, it fits perfectly with the image of the Evil Lady whom joined the Evil One after being “seduced sexually” by him. There is always this smell of perverted sex when it comes to her. From the naïve chaste innocent lady, she was turned into a perverted sexual craving demon, as in she used to rape kids and then sacrifice them and consume them = everything current Bloodlines do nowadays.

• Page 1 180 –

>>14297488

(Please read from the start)

“Etymology

In the Akkadian language of Assyria and Babylonia, the terms lili and līlītu mean spirits. Some uses of līlītu are listed in the Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago (CAD, 1956, L.190), in Wolfram von Soden's Akkadisches Handwörterbuch (AHw, p. 553), and Reallexikon der Assyriologie (RLA, p. 47).”

>> So lili or lililu means Spirits in later dates = Assyrian and Babylonian times.

Incredible how there is a Lili in the movie Legend (1985) – starting page 1 037 - whom fits perfectly with the innocent naïve lady turning into the perverted lustful sex craving evil = just like the double projected image we have of Lilith and Eve. We see the same idea with Theodora from the Oz movie (starting page 925). We have Lily Potter from Harry Potter series; we’ve already taken a look into all of this – page 1 107. We also have Leeloo from the 5th element movie, which along with Lily Potter had Red hair and had a special hidden power = the power of love within her. Amazing isn’t it? Did anons notice the portraits of Lilith being depicted with Reddish hair, sometimes it’s blond/reddish, closer to gold. It’s also linked to the Fleur de Lis and the symbol of Raziel from the movie Motal Instruments: City of Bones (starting page 1 123). Carly is a red hair too and she has special powers too.

“The Sumerian female demons lili have no etymological relation to Akkadian lilu, "evening".”

>> This is rather interesting. So in Sumerian it refers to female demons and in ancient Akkadian = lilu is evening.

“Archibald Sayce (1882) considered that Hebrew lilit (or lilith) לילית and the earlier Akkadian līlītu are from proto-Semitic. Charles Fossey (1902) has this literally translating to "female night being/demon", although cuneiform inscriptions from Mesopotamia exist where Līlīt and Līlītu refers to disease-bearing wind spirits.”

>> I think it’s the mixing of all the interpretations. When you go back to read those multi-morph monsters and demons (like Pazuzu, Humbaba etc.) you will notice all that is mentioned in these few lines about Lilith is said about them as well. As in they bring plagues and diseases, they have something to do with wind-spirits or wind deity and they go after pregnant women, babies and children. They all have these common points. I don’t think Lilith is a name name, as in a real name, it’s more like a descriptif type of name, not even an epithet.

• Page 1 181 –