>>14479473

(Please read from the start)

Whatever that object is, it’s in the safe hands of the ThunderBirds = the divine warriors. If it was in the hands of the Evil Clan, I think they would have already made the claim for the throne of Heaven. It’s obvious the Horned Serpent warriors went on a searching expedition for this special object, but they never found it. It’s “possible” but not certain that the specific = individual ThunderBird whom hid that special object away from the Horned Serpent warrior is dead; might be dead. I’m saying MIGHT, not certain, because this story is told from the Evil Clan perspective. Also anyone notice how Ninurta “shot” the thunderBird with his arrows? = Antelope Clan weapon used = ARROWS = Bronze Plaque of the Hells, weapon number 6. It puts a smile on my face when I read the Horned Serpent warriors “all feared the demon” = the ThunderBird.

“Anzu also appears in the story of "Inanna and the Huluppu Tree", which is recorded in the preamble to the Sumerian epic poem Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Netherworld.”

>> Yes, Anzu shows up in Gilgamesh. I was talking about this before I got into this detour. I think the “Tree” either represents the location of a building or it’s a geographic location. The ThunderBirds were there along with the Serpent = the Evil One, which was slayed. But the ThunderBirds managed to fly away before the explosion happened or as it was happening. Since they could fly, it was easy for them to escape. This is what you can understand from the Epic of Gilgamesh. I’m interested to know whom the “young” of the ThunderBirds was?

“Anzu appears in the Sumerian Lugalbanda and the Anzud Bird (also called: The Return of Lugalbanda).”

>> Here is the link for a quick read for anons about this Lugalbanda story: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lugalbanda_and_the_Anzud_Bird

As anons can see, in this story, the Anzu bird isn’t bad or evil or demonic. It behaves kindly towards Lugalbanda. But…I think this also is a projection of the WINGS THEFT from the ThunderBirds by the Horned Serpents.

“Babylonian and Assyrian myth

The shorter Old Babylonian version was found at Susa. Full version in Myths from Mesopotamia: Creation, The Flood, Gilgamesh, and Others by Stephanie Dalley, page 222 and at The Epic of Anzû, Old Babylonian version from Susa, Tablet II, lines 1-83, read by Claus Wilcke. The longer Late Assyrian version from Nineveh is most commonly called The Myth of Anzu. (Full version in Dalley, page 205). An edited version is at Myth of Anzu.”

• Page 1 275 –

>>14485271

(Please read from the start)

“Also in Babylonian myth, Anzû is a deity associated with cosmogeny. Anzû is represented as stripping the father of the gods of umsimi (which is usually translated "crown" but in this case, as it was on the seat of Bel, it refers to the "ideal creative organ"). Regarding this, Charles Penglase writes that "Ham is the Chaldean Anzû, and both are cursed for the same allegorically described crime," which parallels the mutilation of Uranus by Cronus and of Osiris by Set.”

>> It’s obvious here (((they))) are projecting (((their))) crimes and sins onto (((their))) enemies = the ThunderBirds. (((They))) plotted to take the throne and (((they))) killed the King of kings. The ThunderBirds fought back along with the other warriors from the other clans, including the other Sebetti rulers.

Some of the Anzu bird’s iconography is confused or fused with that of Tiamat by later generation and this misunderstanding still persists till current day, including on the net. So be careful when working.

I would like to talk a bit of the iconography of the Anzu birds we see on the artifacts I’ve put for anons. I picked them from different eras, stopping at the Babylonian and the mutation/change is obvious.

We see the Anzu on some of the reliefs standing on 2 lions which are facing outwards. On one set of the reliefs (the 2 artifact on page 1 272) it’s clear, the Anzu bird is resting on the lions. It’s clear he is not attacking them because of how his talons are resting on the lions. They are not clutching the lion, but simply put on them = resting on them. While on the relief I’m putting with this page, the eagle is still resting on the back of the lions but the lions have their heads turned upwards and they are holding the eagle’s wings in their mouths = biting into it. I don’t think they are attacking one another anons, all 3 animals are represented in a relaxed manner, no tension we usually see displayed during a fight.

Anons will ask me what does it means. Despite the variation between both designs, I think it’s pointing to the same thing: the earliest form of the Griffin. If we combine this iconography of the Anzu Bird to the Burney stele (page 766 & again fourth picture from page 1 245), the famous Ishtar stele, then we will notice the idea behind both is the same. The main idea is of a winged being standing on the back of 2 lions. It doesn’t matter if it’s Ishtar or a ThunderBird standing on the back of the lions because in both cases the interpretation is the same = they both come from the kingdom/land which had its heraldic symbol as a Lion.

I’ve talked of this before and I think this has the potential of representing the kingdom of Atlantis or it could be representing one of those small kingdoms in the Taurus mountain chain after the Flood receded. I think if I keep on going in this thread, I will finally be able to crack this one open and understand the Griffin.

• Page 1 276 –