>>13751328

(Please read from the start)

The last picture I’m presenting about the Seraphim is one called Tetramorph: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetramorph

“A tetramorph is a symbolic arrangement of four differing elements, or the combination of four disparate elements in one unit. The term is derived from the Greek tetra, meaning four, and morph, shape.”

>>Etymology is always important. So here we have 4 different elements combined/mixed together to make one/ to become one.

“Archaeological evidence exists showing that early man divided the four quarters of the horizon, or space, later a place of sacrifice, such as a temple, and attributed characteristics and spiritual qualities to each quarter. Alternatively the composite elements were carved into mythic creatures such as the ancient Egyptian, Greek and Babylonian sphinxes of antiquity depicting bull-like bodies with birds-wings, lion's paws and human faces. Such composite creatures are found in many mythologies.”

>> The 4 quarters of the horizon or space are usually the 4 cardinal points/directions: a lot of altars were oriented in this or that direction; some even follow astronomical/ planetary alignments (depending on the case of course). In this thread, we’ve been seeing loads of Mythic sur-natural creatures, including the Griffins.

“In Christian art, the tetramorph is the union of the symbols of the Four Evangelists, derived from the four living creatures in the Book of Ezekiel, into a single figure or, more commonly, a group of four figures. Each of the four Evangelists is associated with one of the living creatures, usually shown with wings. The most common association, but not the original or only, is: Matthew the man, Mark the lion, Luke the ox, and John the eagle. In Christian art and iconography, Evangelist portraits are often accompanied by tetramorphs, or the symbols alone used to represent them. Evangelist portraits that depict them in their human forms are often accompanied by their symbolic creatures, and Christ in Majesty is often shown surrounded by the four symbols.”

>> So this iconography find its roots in Judaism = specifically in the Book of Ezekiel and it was later on transmitted into Christianity and each animal was associated to one of the Evangelists. In other words, this was never originally a Christian Iconography. This was a transfer.

“The word comes from the Greek for "four forms" or "shapes". In English usage each symbol may be described as a tetramorph in the singular, and a group as "the tetramorphs", but usually only in contexts where all four are included. The tetramorphs were especially common in Early Medieval art, above all in illuminated Gospel books, but remain common in religious art to the present day.

Origins

Images of unions of different elements into one symbol were originally used by the Ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, and Greeks. The image of the sphinx, found in Egypt and Babylon, depicted the body of a lion and the head of a human, while the harpies of Greek mythology showed bird-like human women.”

• Page 908 –

>>13757517

(Please read from the start)

“Ezekiel's living creatures

The prophet Ezekiel lived among the Jews who were exiled to Babylon in the 6th century BC. The creatures in his vision, from which the images of the tetramorph are derived, are reminiscent of ancient Assyrian art.”

>> This is extremely misleading, extremely. First of all these mythical sur-natural creatures iconography is much older than the one of the Assyrians. The Eagle showed up with the Sumerians; anons know them as the Eagle head Anunnakis. We also have the Human face winged Anunnaki. But these 2 are not the only types of Anunnaki we have: we also have an Anunnaki looking like a fish. The rarest Anunnaki iconography is one with the head of a Lion = feline. I’m attaching pictures for anons with this page.

As for the Lamassu = Winged Bull/Ox, saying its origin is Assyrian is nothing but a big fat lie and totally misleading. Researchers and anons are familiar with the famous Lamassu giant portal sculptures. These are at the height of the Lamassu’s artistic representation/ iconography but not the ORIGIN, NOT the STARTING POINT. The Lamassu iconography first come to be under the Sumerians as presented in the imprint of this Sumerian Cylinder seal where a Lamassu is pulling a chariot.

The Lamassu first appeared in the Sumerian culture and art in other words, it’s THOUSANDS of years old; it’s definitely NOT the INVENTION of the Assyrian = a few hundreds of years old. There is a huge misdirection/twisting taking place about the origin of such creatures as the Lamassu that it has put loads of researcher on the wrong tracks for centuries; misleading them away from the truth.

Since we are at it, let’s take a quick look at the Lamassu: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamassu

“Lama, Lamma or Lamassu (Cuneiform: 𒀭𒆗, AN.KAL; Sumerian: Dlammař; later in Akkadian: lamassu; sometimes called a lamassus) is a Sumerian protective deity. Initially depicted as a female deity in Sumerian times, when it was called Lamma, it was later depicted from Assyrian times as a hybrid of a human, bird, and either a bull or lion—specifically having a human head, the body of a bull or a lion, and bird wings, under the name Lamassu. In some writings, it is portrayed to represent a female deity. A less frequently used name is shedu (Cuneiform: 𒀭𒆘, AN.KAL×BAD; Sumerian: Dalad; Akkadian, šēdu), which refers to the male counterpart of a lamassu. Lamassu represent the zodiacs, parent-stars or constellations.”

>> Notice how originally during the Sumerian times the Lama was a FEMALE and it was only thousands of years later, under the Assyrian rule that the Lamassu became MALE. Its original form was that of a Winged Bovine with the head of a HUMAN, but it’s morphed and mutated and we started to have variations of it.

• Page 909 –

>>13757540

(Please read from the start)

“Female goddess Lama

The goddess Lama appears initially as a mediating goddess who precedes the orants and presents them to the gods. The protective deity is clearly labelled as Lam(m)a in a Kassite stele unearthed at Uruk, in the temple of Ishtar, goddess to which she had been dedicated by king Nazi-Maruttash (1307–1282 BCE). It is a goddess wearing a ruffled dress and wearing a horned tiara symbolizing the deity, with two hands raised, in sign of prayer. A. Spycket proposed that similar female figures appearing in particular in glyptics and statuary from the Akkadian period, and in particular in the presentation scenes (common especially in the Paleo-Babylonian era) were to be considered as Lam(m)a. This opinion is commonly followed and in artistic terminology these female figures are generally referred to as Lam(m)a. From Assyrian times, Lamma becomes a hybrid deity, half-animal, half-human.”

>> This is well explained so I’m not going to comment much apart saying that she was a “protective” deity and doesn’t she remind anons of Hathor from Ancient Egypt?

“Lamassu iconography

From Assyrian times, lamassu were depicted as hybrids, with bodies of either winged bulls or lions and heads of human males. The motif of a winged animal with a human head is common to the Near East, first recorded in Ebla around 3000 BCE. The first distinct lamassu motif appeared in Assyria during the reign of Tiglath-Pileser II as a symbol of power.

>> See why I dislike going into the Assyrian period? It’s a mess, a complete mess. They did a very good job in twisting and mixing everything up, pushing us far away from the origins. See anons, the Lamassu were around way before 3000 B.C. and not around 6th century B.C. But no one from the Main Stream History wants you to know this.

“Assyrian sculpture typically placed prominent pairs of lamassu at entrances in palaces, facing the street and also internal courtyards. They were represented as "double-aspect" figures on corners, in high relief. From the front they appear to stand, and from the side, walk, and in earlier versions have five legs, as is apparent when viewed obliquely. Lumasi do not generally appear as large figures in the low-relief schemes running round palace rooms, where winged genie figures are common, but they sometimes appear within narrative reliefs, apparently protecting the Assyrians.”

>> The 5 legs are a visual effect for 3 D representation: as in if you see it from the front you will see 2 legs, but if you are seeing it from the side, you will still see 4 legs. It’s an optical/artistic/esthetic trick.

• Page 910 –

>>13757567

(Please read from the start)

“The colossal entranceway figures were often followed by a hero grasping a wriggling lion, also colossal in scale and in high relief. In the palace of Sargon II at Dur-Sharrukin, a group of at least seven lamassu and two such heroes with lions surrounded the entrance to the "throne room", "a concentration of figures which produced an overwhelming impression of power." They also appear on cylinder seals. Notable examples include those at the Gate of All Nations at Persepolis in Iran, the British Museum in London, the Louvre in Paris, the National Museum of Iraq in Baghdad, the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York and the University of Chicago Oriental Institute. Several examples left in situ in northern Iraq were destroyed in the 2010s by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant when they occupied the area, as were those in the Mosul Museum.”

>> Notables = 7 Lamassu + Museum list + destruction by ISIS terrorists thanks to Hussein and Killary. What are the odds this was orchestrated and ordered by the Bloodlines? For (((them))) to destroy the Lamassu, it means (((they))) hate Winged Bull creatures and (((they))) want to erase their existence from history. This behavior of the Bloodlines towards the Lamassu is leading me to believe the Lamassu were GOOD and enemies of the Bloodline ancestors.

“Terminology

Lamassu represent the zodiacs, parent-stars, or constellations. They are depicted as protective deities because they encompass all life within them. In the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh, they are depicted as physical deities as well, which is where the lamassu iconography originates, these deities could be microcosms of their microcosmic zodiac, parent-star, or constellation. Although lamassu had a different iconography and portrayal in the culture of Sumer, the terms "lamassu", "alad", and "shedu" evolved throughout the Assyro-Akkadian culture from the Sumerian culture to denote the Assyrian-winged-man-bull symbol and statues during the Neo-Assyrian Empire. Female lamassu were called "apsasû".

>> This is extremely important: In early Sumerian accounts of the Lamassu, it is said they were PHYSICAL deities = PHYSICAL BEINGS; as in having a body = existing in Flesh and Blood. But for some unknown reason this was forgotten, ignored and changed into the Lamassu being some type of fantastical creatures. If we add to this what was said about them being protective beings….then….aren’t they guardians = warriors protecting mankind?

I said earlier that I’m suspecting the existence of different TYPES of armor. Well, from the looks of it, it seems we’ve found them. In page 731, I’ve said that we have Acquatic type of armor and was wondering about the ground troops. Is the Ox/Bull one of them as well as the Lion armor? It’s starting to look that way to me…Some anons will argue that the Lamassu had wings…it’s true….so does this mean the Ox armor had the ability to fly as well? I need to gather more clues before making up my mind about the ability of the Ox armor to fly and if they belonged to ground or sky troops?

What is certain about the Ox armor is it battled evil. Why? Do you remember when we were reading about the Eye of Ra (starting page 69) it was said that the Eye of Ra was sometimes personified as Hathor (Cow), Sekhmet (Lioness), Bastet (Cat), Wadjet (Cobra – I see this one as Lightning) and Mut (Vulture symbol) = it’s ALL of them….Every single one is correct. Every single one is a different armor, all worn by warriors, male and female alike. It’s a perfect fit anons, and it makes totally sense to me. And the Lion armor is shown on the Anunnaki relief in page 909 as a warrior holding a dagger/blade.

• Page 911 –

>>13759869

(Please read from the start)

Are the pieces starting to come together for you anons? Are you starting to see the big picture? Not? Then go back, go back to Mesoamerica and to the Andean Region, look at the various artifacts I’ve put for you, it’s all there in front of you. Some examples: Ox on Narmer Palette, the Decapitator from Andean Region, The Jaguar of the Lanzon, and fortress of Incas capital –Cusco shaped like a Jaguar etc. I’m not even mentioning the designs on pottery, metallurgy, textile etc. And I’m not even talking yet about the myths worldwide, like for example,when Ra took the form of a BIG CAT and slayed Apep with a blade (page 808). The list is very long.

The big question is = Does each armor represent the constellation they came from? As in = do the warriors wearing the Ox armor come from the Taurus constellation via the Stargate? And so on for the other constellations and armors? This calls for reflection and it’s better to gather more evidence before looking at this any deeper.

So far we are looking at 4 different types of armors. Anons, did you guess which is the 5th type of armor to add? Yes, it’s our Horned Serpent, the one worn by the Great Evil one.

And here is the list so far:

1 – Eagle armor.

2 – Fish armor.

3 – Lion armor.

4 – Ox/Bull = Lamassu armor.

5 – Horned Serpent armor.

I have also candidates for additional types of armors but I need to look more into this, as in gather more information before making up my mind about them:

1 – The Ram: Ometepe big statues, page 660, 4th picture, first statue has a ram helmet.

2 – The Griffin: I’ve talked about them before and I think they are a special type of warriors/ guardians = the Royal guards = they protect directly the Royal family. The problem I have with them is that they might be one squadron of the Feline armor and another one from the Eagle armor jointly protecting the Royal family. We have one guarding each side of the throne or door. Combined, they represent the Royals.

3 – The Scorpion: We’ve seen different artifacts (starting page 783 with Nergal) indicating Scorpion type of armor existed and it was worn by warriors. The Scorpion also protected Isis when she was fleeing from Seth. We also see it on different pre-dynastic artifacts from Ancient Egypt used as a heraldic symbol by warriors, including Narmer slaying an Ox on his famous palette. So I’m unsure about the Scorpion if it’s a primary armor or a sub-category….till now I’m leaning towards it’s a sub-category one.

4 – The Spider: We’ve seen the Spider appear in different places, cultures and civilizations, like the Great Goddess of Teotihuacan (starting page 294), the Cupisnique culture from the Andean Region (starting page 434) and the Moche Culture (starting page 436).

• Page 912 –