>>14534504

(Please read from the start)

“Other interpretations

A number of less scholarly interpretations of the myth arose through the 20th century, many of them rooted in the tradition of Jungian analysis rather than assyriology.

Diane Wolkstein interprets the myth as a union between Inanna and her own "dark side": her twin sister-self, Ereshkigal. When Inanna ascends from the underworld, it is through Ereshkigal's powers, but, while Inanna is in the underworld, it is Ereshkigal who apparently takes on the powers of fertility. The poem ends with a line in praise, not of Inanna, but of Ereshkigal. Wolkstein interprets the narrative as a praise-poem dedicated to the more negative aspects of Inanna's domain, symbolic of an acceptance of the necessity of death in order to facilitate the continuance of life. It should be pointed out that cultic texts such as god lists do not associate Ereshkigal and Inanna with each other: the former doesn't belong to the circle of Inanna's hyposthases and attendants, but to a grouping of underworld gods (Ninazu, Ningishzida, Inshushinak, Tishpak, etc.) in the famous An-Anum god list; and her "alter egos" in various god lists were similar foreign deities(Allani, Lelwani etc.), not Inanna.”

>> Wolkstein has a point when she says we are probably dealing with different aspects of the Evil Lady. I didn’t look into it, it’s up to those whom are interested in this story.

“Joseph Campbell interpreted the myth as a tale about the psychological power of a descent into the unconscious, the realization of one's own strength through an episode of seeming powerlessness, and the acceptance of one's own negative qualities.

Conversely, philosopher Joshua Mark argues that the most likely moral intended by the original author of the Descent of Inanna is that there are always consequences for one's actions: "The Descent of Inanna, then, about one of the gods behaving badly and other gods and mortals having to suffer for that behavior, would have given to an ancient listener the same basic understanding anyone today would take from an account of a tragic accident caused by someone’s negligence or poor judgment: that, sometimes, life is just not fair."”

>> I disagree with both J. Campbell and J. Mark interpretations.

• Page 1 297 –

>>14539704

(Please read from the start)

“Later myths

Epic of Gilgamesh

In the Akkadian Epic of Gilgamesh, Ishtar appears to Gilgamesh after he and his companion Enkidu have returned to Uruk from defeating the ogre Humbaba and demands Gilgamesh to become her consort. Gilgamesh refuses her, pointing out that all of her previous lovers have suffered:

Listen to me while I tell the tale of your lovers. There was Tammuz, the lover of your youth, for him you decreed wailing, year after year. You loved the many-coloured Lilac-breasted Roller, but still you struck and broke his wing […] You have loved the lion tremendous in strength: seven pits you dug for him, and seven. You have loved the stallion magnificent in battle, and for him you decreed the whip and spur and a thong […] You have loved the shepherd of the flock; he made meal-cake for you day after day, he killed kids for your sake. You struck and turned him into a wolf; now his own herd-boys chase him away, his own hounds worry his flanks.”

>> This part is another treasure of information:

1 – Tammuz = the Evil One was the lover of the Evil Lady when she was young. Its fits perfectly with her naïve and innocent side, since she is that age when the Evil One seduced her and converted her to his side. It seems now, when Gilgamesh is supposedly talking with her, the Evil Lady had gotten older and she mourned for many years the death of the Evil One.

2 – It’s hard to know whom the “many-coloured Lilac-breasted Roller” is. It can be a ThunderBird warrior, or it can be the head of the ThunderBirds, or it can be a multi-morph warrior. It can also be a Lamassu warrior = anyone with wings.

3 – The lion here is obviously someone from the Feline Clan…but…read carefully = she dug a pit for him; as in she killed him. And the number 7 is mentioned twice. Is this indicating/ pointing to the murder of the King of kings? Is Gilgamesh telling her that ONCE you loved your Father, the Great King, but then you plotted against Him and you killed Him?

I think this is highly possible, mostly if we combine this sentence with the one before it = the previous sentence. Why? Because I think in the previous sentence Gilgamesh might be talking about the Crown Prince, her younger brother. It is said that she broke the wings of her brother = he is not dead, but she tried to harm him. This fits perfectly with what we’ve read before and how Isis had to flee with baby Horus from Seth and his followers. If my interpretation is correct, then we just found the 2 heraldic animals of the King of kings = the Feline Sebetti. And the Crown Prince’s = the ThunderBirds.

4 – The Stallion could be a heraldic animal of a vassal clan or some type of sub-symbol of one of the Sebetti rulers, like how we have the Fish men for the King of kings and the Spider for the Queen of queens. So this “Stallion” clan member got the whip and sounds like he was tortured by Inanna.

• Page 1 298 –

>>14539710

(Please read from the start)

5 – The Shepard of her flock can have 2 possible meanings:

A – We are talking again about the Evil One whom used to sacrifice and consume children along with her. The other Sebetti clans, including the rulers, rejected this and saw the Evil Couple as traitors and evil and they were chased down by the other Clans; which is what we are seeing in this thread so far. The Evil One was a Sheppard = guardian of the flock when he was still good; he was supposed to protect the people. But when his illness showed up and he turned Evil, he became a wolf preying on the people.

B – The Evil Lady had many lovers after the death of the Evil One. One of them might have belonged to the Wolf Clan and he was acting like a servant for her = bringing sacrifices = children for her to consume. This was found out by the other warriors and he was chased down by them.

“Infuriated by Gilgamesh's refusal, Ishtar goes to heaven and tells her father Anu that Gilgamesh has insulted her. Anu asks her why she is complaining to him instead of confronting Gilgamesh herself. Ishtar demands that Anu give her the Bull of Heaven and swears that if he does not give it to her, she will "break in the doors of hell and smash the bolts; there will be confusion [i.e., mixing] of people, those above with those from the lower depths. I shall bring up the dead to eat food like the living; and the hosts of the dead will outnumber the living.”

>> This has nothing to do with Gilgamesh and his refusal for Inanna. Here the Evil Lady is demanding the Seat of the Queen of queens = the throne of her mother. She threatened her Father to MIX those whom are living BELOW and those whom are living ABOVE. Do you remember there was a Floating mountain mentioned in the Native American ThunderBird tale? Is that the ABOVE and we = on the surface of the Earth are the BELOW?

I think the Evil Lady threatened her Father to kill everyone = mixing the living and the dead = bringing Apocalypse on Earth. Mixing the people from Above with the people of BELOW as in she will bring down whatever the LAND or PLACE was ABOVE. This is indicating that the Sebetti rulers and their warriors didn’t live on the surface of the Earth like the people, but they lived on something that was floating or flying above Earth, maybe in the sky.

“Anu gives Ishtar the Bull of Heaven, and Ishtar sends it to attack Gilgamesh and his friend Enkidu. Gilgamesh and Enkidu kill the Bull and offer its heart to the sun-god Shamash. While Gilgamesh and Enkidu are resting, Ishtar stands up on the walls of Uruk and curses Gilgamesh. Enkidu tears off the Bull's right thigh and throws it in Ishtar's face, saying, "If I could lay my hands on you, it is this I should do to you, and lash your entrails to your side." (Enkidu later dies for this impiety.) Ishtar calls together "the crimped courtesans, prostitutes and harlots"and orders them to mourn for the Bull of Heaven. Meanwhile, Gilgamesh holds a celebration over the Bull of Heaven's defeat.”

>> Enkidu must have had one heck of a strength to be able to rip that bull’s thigh and one heck of a throw to be able to throw that BIG thigh of the Lamassu THAT HIGH = on top of the wall where Inanna was standing. If you are gullible you will believe this to have had happened. But it didn’t, since we know that the BULL of Heaven = Neith = the Queen of queens didn’t die and she survived, not just from being murdered, but from the Cataclysm as well. So this is all made up, or it’s a part talking about something else and it was inserted here. But I think this is all made up just to inflate (((their))) ego and make it sound as if the Evil Lady got rid of the Queen of queens.

• Page 1 299 –

>>14539721

(Please read from the start)

“Later in the epic, Utnapishtim tells Gilgamesh the story of the Great Flood, which was sent by the god Enlil to annihilate all life on earth because the humans, who were vastly overpopulated, made too much noise and prevented him from sleeping. Utnapishtim tells how, when the flood came, Ishtar wept and mourned over the destruction of humanity, alongside the Anunnaki. Later, after the flood subsides, Utnapishtim makes an offering to the gods. Ishtar appears to Utnapishtim wearing a lapis lazuli necklace with beads shaped like flies and tells him that Enlil never discussed the flood with any of the other gods. She swears him that she will never allow Enlil to cause another flood and declares her lapis lazuli necklace a sign of her oath. Ishtar invites all the gods except for Enlil to gather around the offering and enjoy.”

>> This part is most probably made up too and inserted later on to the story. There are 2 notables though:

1 – The Earth was overpopulated this is why the coup plotters wanted to kill everyone. (((They))) are admitting (((they))) were the ones whom caused the Cataclysm. It’s the same Agenda nowadays Bloodlines have and the Covid plandemic was a redo. Bill Gates, Prince Charles and many of (((them))) talked about this openly many times.

2 – What’s the deal with the flies, either in this tale or in the tale where a fly tells Inanna where Dumuzid’s body is? Flies come from rotten food or from rotting human bodies. I better stop here and not go further in my thoughts.

“Other tales

A myth about the chilhood of the god Ishum, viewed as a son of Shamash, describes Ishtar seemingly temporarily taking care of him, and possibly expressing annoyance at that situation.”

>> Of course the Evil Lady would be annoyed of taking care of a child because first she is a queen and second she likes to eat children, not take care of them.

“In a pseudepigraphical Neo-Assyrian text written in the seventh century BCE, but which claims to be the autobiography of Sargon of Akkad, Ishtar is claimed to have appeared to Sargon "surrounded by a cloud of doves" while he was working as a gardener for Akki, the drawer of the water. Ishtar then proclaimed Sargon her lover and allowed him to become the ruler of Sumer and Akkad.”

• Page 1 300 –