>>13844568

(Please read from the start)

“However, another description in a tablet sold to a museum in Sulaymaniyah in 2011 is more positive about Humbaba:

"Where Humbaba came and went there was a track, the paths were in good order and the way was well trodden … Through all the forest a bird began to sing: A wood pigeon was moaning, a turtle dove calling in answer. Monkey mothers sing aloud, a youngster monkey shrieks: like a band of musicians and drummers daily they bash out a rhythm in the presence of Humbaba."

In this version of the story, Humbaba is beloved of the gods and a kind of king in the palace of the forest. Monkeys are his heralds, birds his courtiers, and his entire throne room breathes with the aroma of cedar resin. The tablet goes on to portray Gilgamesh as an aggressor who destroys a forest unnecessarily, and Humbaba's death is lamented by Enkidu.”

>> Well, this is true. Humbaba was in his territory = his dominion. Enkidu and Gilgamesh came to “get rid” of Humbaba. If someone knocks on your door while wanting to shoot you, do you welcome them nicely? This is a perspective issue here anons: it all depends which side is writing the story. If we hear the side of Gilgamesh, then the narrative is in one set, but if we hear the side of Humbaba, we will get another narrative set, won’t we? It all depends whom is writing this, which side. I wonder if this is one of the text translated by Finkel (starting page 20), remember him anons?

“Demise

Humbaba is first mentioned in Tablet II of the Epic of Gilgamesh. After Gilgamesh and Enkidu become friends following their initial fight, they set out on an adventure to the Cedar Forest beyond the seventh mountain range, to slay Humbaba (Huwawa): "Enkidu," Gilgamesh vows, "since a man cannot pass beyond the final end of life, I want to set off into the mountains, to establish my renown there." Gilgamesh tricks the monster into giving away his seven "radiances" by offering his sisters as wife and concubine. When Humbaba's guard is down, Gilgamesh punches him and captures the monster. Defeated, Humbaba appeals to a receptive Gilgamesh for mercy, but Enkidu convinces Gilgamesh to slay Humbaba. In a last effort, Humbaba tries to escape but is decapitated by Enkidu, or in some versions by both heroes together; his head is put in a leather sack, which is brought to Enlil, the god who set Humbaba as the forest's guardian. Enlil becomes enraged upon learning this and redistributes Humbaba's seven splendors (or in some tablets "auras"):

"He gave Humbaba's first aura to the fields. He gave his second aura to the rivers. He gave his third aura to the reed-beds. He gave his fourth aura to the lions. He gave his fifth aura to the palace (one text has debt slaves). He gave his sixth aura to the forests (one text has the hills). He gave his seventh aura to Nungal.”

No vengeance was laid upon the heroes, though Enlil says, "He should have eaten the bread that you eat, and should have drunk the water that you drink! He should have been honored."

>> So anons, do tell me: what do you think these AURAS were? What are these SPLENDORS? Do you think they were crystals or gems like the ones the Native American Horned Serpent had on the forehead, as well as some of the Seraphim used to also have on the forehead? Or are they blasters from the Horned Serpent armor? And again, we have the number 7 popping out = whatever these auras were, we have 7 of them.

• Page 955 –

>>13848891

(Please read from the start)

Enkidu didn’t trust Humbaba and wasn’t swayed with his words like Gilgamesh was. Does this imply Humbaba was a master of lies and deceit = had a golden tongue, just like the Serpent from the Garden of Eden? Remember how Nergal convinced Marduk to leave the City-State of Babylon? Is this the art of deception of the Horned Serpent Clan we are witnessing here?

Of course Enlil was in a pure state of rage upon hearing of the death of one of his fellow warriors.

“As each gift was given by Gilgamesh, he received a "terror" (= "radiance") in exchange, from Humbaba. The seven gifts successively given by Gilgamesh were:

1. his sister, Ma-tur,

2. (a gap in the text),

3. eca-flour,

4. big shoes,

5. tiny shoes,

6. semi-precious stones, and

7. a bundle of tree-branches.”

>> Sounds like a trade took place between Humbaba and Gilgamesh. What are these “terrors” Gilgamesh received? Why are they called radiance? What can be radiant and terrorize in the same time? The only thing that comes to my mind are the blasters from the Horned Serpent armor which sparkles and emits light like a gem = making it radiant. Or the incredible Staff-Weapon = Sharur, which emits electricity = electricty does sparkle, no?

“While Gilgamesh thus distracts and tricks this spirit of the cedar forest, the fifty unmarried young men he has brought on the adventure are felling cedar timber, stripping it of its branches and laying it "in many piles on the hillside," ready to be taken away. Thus the adventure reveals itself in the context of a timber raid, bringing cedar wood to timberless Mesopotamia.”

>> So Gilgamesh was there to loot wood from Phoenicians because there was no wood in Mesopotamia. Incredible how some archaeologists and researchers mess easy things up like what Bernardo Biados did on page 648. You need a lot of wood to build sturdy boats to take on the high sea. There were none in Mesopotamias, so how come they mastered sailing when they didn’t have the tool = ships to do it? Because they didn’t, it was the Phoenicians whom sailed the high seas and their services were rented by other nations.

“As his death approaches, and Gilgamesh is oppressed with his own mortality, the gods remind him of his great feats: "…having fetched cedar, the unique tree, from its mountains, having killed Humbaba in the forest…”

The iconography of the apotropaic severed head of Humbaba, with staring eyes, flowing beard and wild hair, is well documented from the First Babylonian dynasty, continuing into Neo-Assyrian art and dying away during the Achaemenid rule. The severed head of the monstrous Humbaba found a Greek parallel in the myth of Perseus and the similarly employed head of Medusa, which Perseus placed in his leather sack. Archaic Greek depictions of the gorgoneion render it bearded, an anomaly in the female Gorgon. Judith McKenzie detected Humbaba heads in a Nabatean tomb frieze at Petra.”

• Page 956 –

>>13848913

(Please read from the start)

>> Well, I won’t be surprised to find out that the story of Humbaba was transferred to the Greeks via the Hittites. But regardless if the transfer occurred or not, Medusa was also a Horned Serpent warrior just like Humbaba was. We are dealing with the same group here, it’s just the details are a bit different depending on the culture and the generation the tale is told in.

I keep on talking about mutation, distortion and even mutilation to historical fact in this thread. I’m going to show anons an imprint of a Sumerian Seal where Gilgamesh and Enkidu are killing Humbaba – first picture attached to this page. On the oldest = Sumerian imprint, we can clearly see that Humbaba had a full human body and he is wearing a horned helmet similar to the one Nergal wears. Sure, it’s not identical, but it’s close. That’s clearly a horned helmet. Above the scene we also see 7 dots displayed on 2 rows. Do these 7 dots represent the 7 radiances or terrors mentioned in the Wikipedia page? And did anons notice the “shining star” right above Humbaba? Is that really a star? Or is it a Beam of Light from above?

The second picture I’m attaching with this page is the imprint of a cylinder seal from the Assyrian time. The transformation is huge. The human body of Humbaba was replaced by the one of a winged bull, transforming him into a Lamassu; an image extremely far away from his true and original one. Gilgamesh is also represented with wings as if he was wearing a ThunderBird flying gear.

This is a very good example of how ancient knowledge mutated with later generations. See now why the researcher should stick to the oldest period and not go into the Assyrian one?

There is something troubeling me: In the Anvegers movie series, there is a scene from the one called The Avengers: Age of Ultron, where Thor is leaving at the end of the movie and Tony along Steve, are seeing him “take off” in the Bifrost. Then Tony cracks a joke about Thor having no regards to lawn maintenance. Did anyone notice the pattern the Bifrost made on the lawn? I did. The 4th picture is the publically known patter left by the Bifrost. But if I flip that pattern upside down what do anons see?

I’ve marked the eyes in red and highlighted in green the contour of the face for anons. I’ve also put in yellow what seems to be the cheek plates identical to what the Amazones wear in Wonder Woman. This Bifrost pattern even has braided hair on it = marked in brown. Compare with the amulet of Humbaba, first picture in page 953 while keeping in mind that the amulet is in 3 D shape, while the Bifrost pattern in the movie is in 2 D shape. What do you think? Similar or not? I’m confused about it.

Some may argue this is a Viking warrior represented by the Bifrost or an Asgardian warrior. Well, maybe….but….weren’t the Horned Serpents also warrior of that Ancient Lost Civilization just like the ThunderBirds? But then they wanted to grab power and rebelled; and a calamity occurred as a consequence of their greed for power. This might be a Viking or Asgardian warrior, but seeing how Satanic oriented the Avengers’ series is, which one do you think it is: Viking, Asgardian or Humbaba? Make up your own mind about it. Strangely, it also reminds me of what the Amazones are wearing in Wonder Woman.

• Page 957 –