>>14099810

(Please read from the start)

Movie 3: The conjuring 2.

Here is the Link for those whom would like to read more about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Conjuring_2

“The Conjuring 2 (known in the UK and Ireland as The Conjuring 2: The Enfield Case ) is a 2016 American supernatural horror film, directed by James Wan. The screenplay is by Chad Hayes, Carey W. Hayes, Wan, and David Leslie Johnson. It is the sequel to 2013's The Conjuring, the second installment in The Conjuring series, and the third installment in the Conjuring Universe franchise. Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga reprise their roles as paranormal investigators and authors Ed and Lorraine Warren from the first film. The film follows the Warrens as they travel to the United Kingdom to assist the Hodgson family, who are experiencing poltergeist activity at their Enfield council house in 1977 which later became referred to as the Enfield poltergeist.

[…]”

>> I’m not interested in this movie much. I’m only interested in one thing in it and this is why I’m going to skip parts of the plot. You can read it yourselves in the link if you are interested.

“Plot

In 1976, paranormal investigators Ed and Lorraine Warren investigate the Amityville murders at the Amityville house, to determine if a demonic presence was truly responsible for Ronald DeFeo Jr. killing his entire family on November 13, 1974, and the subsequent haunting incident involving the Lutz family. During a seance, Lorraine is drawn into a vision where she relives the murders. The spirit of one of the killed children lures her to the basement, where she encounters a demonic nun figure and witnesses Ed being impaled, frightening her.

[…]

Ed and Lorraine quickly return to the Hodgson residence, only to find Janet possessed and the rest of the Hodgsons locked outside the house. Ed ventures inside alone and finds Janet at the window, ready to commit suicide. He manages to grab Janet in time, but is close to falling. Lightning strikes the tree in the front yard, turning it into the object that impales Ed in Lorraine's vision. Lorraine finds her Bible in which she wrote the demon's name – Valak. She addresses the demon by its name, successfully condemning it back to Hell. Janet is freed of its possession, and Lorraine pulls her and Ed to safety.

[…]”

>> You guessed it right anons: I’m interested in Valak. Not the nun or the other demons, only in Valak.

• Page 1 082 –

>>14105795

(Please read from the start)

Let’s start by talking about the movie poster and the nun. The movie makers chose a nun to make her one of the demon forms on purpose, including her holding a chaplet. I think anons already guessed why this was done this way and you don’t need me to explain things. Anons should know that demons cannot be in the presence of anything Holy nor in the presence of Christ.

Then look at how the main actress is behaving with the thing behind the scenes. Yeah, I know this is a rubber mask but even if this is just her being silly, kissing that demon that way and publishing the image online sends a lot of negative signals, mostly to the young and weak people whom can be easily manipulated.

I want to attrack your attention next to the size as in the height of the demon. This one is a bit shorter than what he should be. How do I know that? Remember what we saw all 3 of us and how that commander demon was approximately double the size of a normal person? And yes anons, you have guessed it, this is what was standing in front of the young man and tried many times to grab him and tried to bribe him. This form of shape of a thing was in front of the young man. We don’t how, but somehow we understood that this demon was a high ranking one, like some type of general or some type of commander.

The details of the face weren’t clear to us, apart the eyes. It was as if the face was hidden behind something. So we don’t know if that commander demon’s face looked like this with pointy teeth and all of that stuff. But as I’ve told you before, there was this substance floating, something like liquid or vapor and it was covering him, including his face.

Please look at the clip I’m attaching with this page. See how the demon in the movie loses it when the main actress confronts him? Also, if you can see slow motion how he clings back onto the wall; he doesn’t vanish in midair, he vanished from the wall behind him, as if he was sucked back into the wall. Then look at how, while he is transforming from the nun shape into his horned demonic shape, there is dark substance floating around him and from him. It’s like it’s coming out from his own body or is a part of his body. Compare with what we saw with Sarafine from the movie Beautiful Creatures; see what I mean?

Yes, what was standing in front of the young man had horns very similar to these. It was hard to see them accurately though or see the details because of that dark substance. It kept on moving as if it was alive. If one day, out of bad luck the reader run into such entities, whatever you do, do NOT touch that black = dark substance. If you do, it will absorb you and you will become one with it; as in you will become part of darkness.

I’m trying to give anons a visual of what we saw on that day. This is not identical, but it’s close enough. When I saw this movie, well….it rattled me. Not to see the demon, but to see how close Hollywood made this rubber demon to the real one. I would say this is 80% close to the real thing. I told you we were terrified on that day, and I wasn’t exaggerating when I said these words. This is not something you want to see or face. This is what was standing right in front of the young man, face to face. I honestly don’t know how the young man got the courage to stand up to this demon, but he did and he kept on giving him a one word reply = NO. Think about all of this anons. If it were you standing in front of such entity, what would you do? Think hard and deep. This is no game.

• Page 1 083 –

>>14105810

There seem to be a problem with the video I picked. I'm attaching a new one. Sorry about that.