Anonymous ID: cbea99 Aug. 26, 2021, 3:02 a.m. No.14462266   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2280

>>14452872

 

(Please read from the start)

 

“Inanna was also worshipped as one of the Sumerian war deities. One of her hymns declares: "She stirs confusion and chaos against those who are disobedient to her, speeding carnage and inciting the devastating flood, clothed in terrifying radiance. It is her game to speed conflict and battle, untiring, strapping on her sandals." Battle itself was occasionally referred to as the "Dance of Inanna". Epithets related to lions in particular were meant to highlight this aspect of her character. As a war goddess she was sometimes referred to with the name Irnina ("victory"), though this epithet could be applied to other deities as well, in addition to functioning as a distinct goddess linked to Ningishzida rather than Ishtar.”

 

>> All of these: Ishtar etc. could all be different aspects of her the Evil Lady. We also know here that the Evil Lady used to be like Eris (Greek Mythology) = causing strife. “It is her game to speed conflict and battle” = how do you create conflict and fan the flames? = creating strife to divide people and make them fight each other. Then when they are both exhausted, you come in and take it all. Isn’t this the method used by the Bloodlines to destroy Nations worldwide and to destroy society? It’s the same method used by Inanna.

 

I already explain many times about the Lion, so I’m not going there again. Here, they are clearly saying that Inanna was the one (or among those) whom ignited/started/ triggered the Cataclysm. I think it was part of the coup plotters plan to cause some sort of big event….but, it’s obvious they got surprised by the scale of Cataclysm = they weren’t expecting it to blow up this much. Things didn’t go as they wanted them to and everything crumbled.

 

I got a huge smile on my face when I read that she was “clothed in terrifying radiance”. She is wearing her Sebetti armor, a multi-morph since she merged other armor tech with her original one. She also has blasters on her armor from the looks of it.

 

Also, when we read about all the multi-morph warriors, we can clearly see they all share other common points = massacres & bringing plagues on mankind. I think if there are massacres and the bodies are not buried quickly, then….it explains the plagues and the rest of such diseases.

 

Her epithet as Victory: This is the origin behind current days Bloodline liking of Nike/Victory. (((They))) think it refers to her = the Evil Lady. These idiots thought this is only hers and as long as Victory is on (((their))) side, (((they))) do whatever (((they))) want and (((they))) will always come on top of things = be victorious, win. Funny how things are, because in the same sentence, they say in Wikipedia that MANY deities had that epithet. I think this is because there were many battles fought back then, some were won by the warriors of the Light while others were won by the warriors of Darkness, while some must have been neck-to-neck. So we cannot say Victory is exclusively hers = the Evil Lady epithet.

 

  • Page 1 260 –

Anonymous ID: cbea99 Aug. 26, 2021, 3:05 a.m. No.14462280   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2290

>>14462266

 

(Please read from the start)

 

Put everything together anons. You will understand why Killary’s name is Diana = a mutated form, referring to the Evil Lady. Why Chelsea’s name is Victoria. You will understand the 16 years plan and why they were planning to wipe out humanity as mentioned on the Georgia Stones = everything current day Bloodlines have done and are doing was a REDO of the past or should I say an imitation of the past – copying it. (((They))) are trying to open that portal, bring back the Spirit of the Evil Lady and finally make her sit on the Divine Throne. This is the side of the Payseur branch of the Merovingian Bloodline = the descendants of the French royals = the Bourbon dynasty.

 

When I go to the other branch, the British branch of the Merovingian Bloodline, there are loads of similarities but the situation is not identical, there are a tiny bit of differences. The name of the mother is the same = Diana, but she had a son, not a daughter and that son was named on purpose William. I know Diana was a direct descendant of William the Conqueror. Most probably a pure blood Merovingian descendant herself, just like it’s the case with Killary. I think the Windsors are planning to bring back the Evil One, unlike the Payseurs whom are trying to bring back the Evil Lady.

 

What’s the meaning of the name William? = https://www.verywellfamily.com/william-name-meaning-origin-popularity-5180080

 

“What Does William Mean?

 

The name William is a timeless classic with English roots that date back almost a thousand years, yet is still popular today. It means "resolute protector" or "strong-willed warrior" and comes from Wilhelm, of Old German origin. After the name was introduced to England by William the Conqueror at the time of the Conquest, it gained status as a fashionable moniker.

 

[…]”

 

>> If (((they))) named Chelsea after the Evil Lady epithet, does it mean (((they))) named William after the epithet of the Evil One? I think the chances are high the situation is like that. Then, this means among the many epithets describing the Evil One is “strong-willed warrior”, it fits the Evil One good, but he was not the only one with a strong will.

 

We know the Light warriors also had strong will, just re-read the many samples I’ve put about the clan warriors. This also includes Neith = she was a strong willed Lady and her will power was so strong, she could change FATE itself with it. I believe she had the strongest will power among all the Sebetti rulers; she was the most powerful one in this point.

 

The meaning of “protector” is also a correct description of the Evil One because before he turned Evil, he was one of the protectors of the throne of the King of kings. He was most probably one of the other Sebetti rulers whom protected the ultimate King.

 

  • Page 1 261 –

Anonymous ID: cbea99 Aug. 26, 2021, 3:09 a.m. No.14462290   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2641

>>14462280

 

(Please read from the start)

 

My teacher and mentor thinks the Evil One is not a Sebetti king but actually a son of a Sebetti king. He bases this from how Lucifer is called a “Prince” not a king. I don’t agree with my teacher, I think he was a Sebetti ruler = a minor king, and because he is a minor one, not the ultimate, top King, that’s why we can say he is a prince = coming second to the King of kings. Either way, both of us old men agree that we are very close to the truth = hovering around it. Just some details and adjustments needed here and there = “un peu de calibrage” is needed.

 

So you see dear readers, it all fits together, the anciet and current days. One Merovingian branch is trying to bring back the spirit of the Evil One, while the other branch is trying to bring back the spirit of the Evil Lady. And I think both of them are terribly koo koo in the head; thinking “breeding” then naming the Child of the prophecy according to one of the Evil duo, will make (((their))) fantasy dreams of bringing back the founding Evil Couple back all true.

 

“A late hymn contains the phrase "she [Ishtar] is Enlil, she is Ninil" which might be a reference to occasionally "dimorphic" character of Ishtar, in addition to serving as an exaltation. A hymn to Nanaya alludes to a male aspect of Ishtar from Babylon alongside a variety of more standard descriptions. Gary Beckman states that "ambiguous gender identification" was a characteristic of a category he refers to as "Ishtar type" goddesses (ex. Shaushka, Pinikir or Ninsianna).”

 

>> I’ve already explain how is this possible: I think the word Ishtar (yes a word and not a name) was used to point out to the Antelope warriors in Mesopotamia and Syria = regardless of their gender as warriors. But later on, with new generation, this mutated and transformed into the name of the leader of such warriors = the Evil Lady. This is how Ishtar with dual genders became associated to Inanna. I’ve never been that interested in Ishtar as a deity because she comes on a later date as in she is a mutation of later generations.

 

As for the hymn containing the notion that Ishtar is Enlil = Ninil. First of all, they said it themselves this is later in date. Second, this could point to Ishtar/Inanna/the Evil Lady being the “same” as Enlil = a ruler = royalty = a king/queen. It actually fits, despite the late date, with the Evil Lady being a Sebetti queen, a minor queen, but a queen nonetheless. As well as she was a daughter of the Sun, just like Enlil was a son of the Sun.

 

  • Page 1 262 –