>>14386701

(Please read from the start)

>> This story should be handled very carefully. We know all the Sebettis and their warriors were called “children of the Sun”; this is how later generations thoughts they were all brothers and sisters. I don’t think they were biological siblings, at least not all of them (apart the royal family maybe).

The 7 judges of the underworld are most probably the Sebetti rulers here. It’s hard to explain or understand for now how one of the Sebetti rulers was judged by the 7 other rulers. Since she was a part of the 7….where the other 7 rulers come from? The King of kings is dead, murdered. And the Evil One is dead as well. So that leaves 4 other Sebetti rulers to play the role of judge since the Evil Lady is the accused. Where did they bring the number 7 then? There is something unclear here or a piece of the puzzle I haven’t gotten my hands on yet.

What is the Underworld? Where is the Underworld? This is another hard question to answer. There are many possibilities. One of them is rather strange and creepy. If I take into consideration the floating mountain from the tales of the Native American ThunderBirds, this makes that place the Upperworld, right? If that is the case, then it makes the earth = the LAND the Underworld, right? As in it’s the world that is UNDER the Upper one.

Another one is the theory of Hollow Earth. Well, as I just said, these are just a couple of the many possibilities out there. This is a door that I don’t want to open and I don’t want to go into this endless tunnel. This dig deserves a book of its own. It’s very deep, so I won’t be going there or I won’t be able to continue with my objectives.

Inanna’s vassal = Ninshubur did something or negotiated something to try to bring back Inanna from the Underworld. Instead of her, her husband was cast away there, for only 6 months in the end, after one of her “sisters” were sent to replace him for the other 6 months. Here, it’s terribly confusing. Was the Evil Lady supposed to die but her vassals intervened and instead of her getting hurt and die, the Evil One was hit instead? Was it some type of scenario where she was about to get shot and the Evil One stood in front of her and got shot in her place? Since it’s a tragic love story, I keep on wondering what really happened. But everything keeps on pointing us in the same direction = the Evil One died. But the rest, is unclear.

“Etymology

Inanna and Ishtar were originally separate, unrelated deities, but they were equated with each other during the reign of Sargon of Akkad and came to be regarded as effectively the same goddess under two different names. Inanna's name may derive from the Sumerian phrase nin-an-ak, meaning "Lady of Heaven", but the cuneiform sign for Inanna is not a ligature of the signs lady (Sumerian: nin; Cuneiform: SAL.TUG2) and sky (Sumerian: an; Cuneiform: AN). These difficulties led some early Assyriologists to suggest that Inanna may have originally been a Proto-Euphratean goddess, who was only later accepted into the Sumerian pantheon. This idea was supported by Inanna's youthfulness, as well as the fact that, unlike the other Sumerian divinities, she seems to have initially lacked a distinct sphere of responsibilities. The view that there was a Proto-Euphratean substrate language in Southern Iraq before Sumerian is not widely accepted by modern Assyriologists.”

• Page 1 229 –

>>14395557

(Please read from the start)

“The name Ishtar occurs as an element in personal names from both the pre-Sargonic and post-Sargonic eras in Akkad, Assyria, and Babylonia. It is of Semitic derivation and is probably etymologically related to the name of the West Semitic god Attar, who is mentioned in later inscriptions from Ugarit and southern Arabia. The morning star may have been conceived as a male deity who presided over the arts of war and the evening star may have been conceived as a female deity who presided over the arts of love. Among the Akkadians, Assyrians, and Babylonians, the name of the male god eventually supplanted the name of his female counterpart, but, due to extensive syncretism with Inanna, the deity remained as female, although her name was in the masculine form.”

>> Here we have a grand mystery on our hands anons. It’s the origin of the confusion about the gender of the Antelope Sebetti. Because of how the name is spelled, it’s undetermined if its origin is female or male. Some attest it’s one while the others attest it’s the second one. Don’t forget that the Bloodlines didn’t know much, just like it’s our situation right now. So (((they))) started to discover things gradually just like what is happening to us right now.

I believe this is where the hermaphrodite idea originated and all of this transgender gibberish comes from. It’s because it’s unclear which gender the Antelope Sebetti is. It seems there is doubt about it gender because there are similarities to the situation with what had happened with Lamassu: she was a female at first, then with the Assyrian times, she mutated to become male. Some of (((them))) believe there is a similar case here, as in it’s possible Inanna might have been a male deity called by another name, but it mutated and it became a female deity called Inanna around Sargon’s time.

Anons are going to ask me: so which one is it, male or female? It’s hard to tell. If the Bloodlines whom had several centuries of knowledge before we did, couldn’t figure this one out, it’s even harder for us, normal people, to figure it out. But I think this applies mostly to Inanna’s warriors/clan more than to her. When you think deep about it, Inanna is most likely female, but since her warriors were from both genders and all wearing the same type of armor = this might be the starting point for the gender confusion.

I want to take a tiny detour and check on the deity Attar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attar_(god)

“Aṯtar (Arabic: ‎; Musnad: ) is an ancient Semitic deity whose role, name, and even gender varied by culture. Depicted as either male or female, the deity was identified with the planet Venus. In pre-Islamic Southern Arabia, he was worshipped as a god of war.”

>> It’s clear we are dealing with the Antelop Clan warriors here anons. And I think the warriors were of both genders, just like what we’ve seen with the other clans: there are female and male warriors here as well. It’s not surprising if you remember Satis and Anuket from Ancient Egypt. Both were females and both belonged to the Antelope Clan.

• Page 1 230 –

>>14395568

(Please read from the start)

This gives us a good idea on the geographical spread of the Antelope clan warriors. I think it fits perfectly with what I was saying as to Lilith/Inanna/the Evil Lady had settled as a first step somewhere in the Taurus mountain range. From there, as the flood waters receded, her warriors spread South going into Mesopotamia, Syria, and then Phoenicia. They most probably discovered another Sebetti already settled in Phoenicia, so under the leadership of the Evil Lady, they attacked the territory of that Sebetti ruler. Neith, whom was in Ancient Egypt, intervened in the fight and came to the rescue of that Sebetti ruler whom was settled in Phoenicia. The fight was long. Only after many centuries had passed by that the influence of the Evil Lady cult spread once again in the Middle East.

As for the gender of Ishtar….I don’t think there should be confusion because the Antelope warriors were from both genders and we’ve seen in all other clans that the Sebetti superhuman warriors were also deified and glorified along with their ruler. So in other words, these Antelope warriors also had superhuman strength and were most probably deified, male and female alike. So in one city we had a female deified warrior, and in the next city, it was a male deified warrior, and so on. This is how we got in the same time male and female deified Antelope warriors. Take a look at the Feline warriors in Ancient Egypt to understand what I’m saying here. We have the same situation with the Antelope warriors but it’s in Mesopotamia, not in Ancient Egypt.

I think they settled finally on Ishtar being a female because of her sexual appetite. Don’t forget that wherever you hear of the practice of “sacred prostitution” it’s where the cult of the Evil Lady was taking place.

With all of this, I cannot stop thinking that the Antelope Sebetti ruler might be a female. With everything that I’ve accumulated so far, from Lilith to the other information I’ve got about the Evil Lady…. I cannot help but think she must have been the ruler of the Antelope Clan. I’m not certain a 100% but I’m starting to lean in that direction. But when you think about it, it makes sense why the Bacchanalias took place with goat like creatures and why the god Pan was depicted with big sexual appetite and was goat like. This is all the sexual cult of the Evil Lady. She was the sexual hungry Sebetti ruler whom stayed alive, while the Evil One died. So she couldn’t have sex with him anymore and started demanding to be satisfied by anyone she can get her hands on.

“Name and identity

The name appears as Attar (Aramaic), Athtar (South Arabia), Astar (Aksum), Ashtar (Moab), Aṯtar (Ugarit) and Ištar in Mesopotamia. In both genders, Aṯtar is identified with the planet Venus, the morning and evening star, in some manifestations of Semitic mythology. The deity is also connected to the Hellenistic goddess Astarte.”

>> I just explained about both genders issue, so I’m not going to repeat.

• Page 1 231 –

>>14395585

(Please read from the start)

“Attar was worshipped in Southern Arabia in pre-Islamic times. A god of war, he was often referred to as "He who is Bold in Battle". One of his symbols was the spear-point and the antelope was his sacred animal. He had power over Venus, the morning star, and was believed to provide humankind with water.”

>> The old man hit the bull’s eye with this one, didn’t he? ^_^ I want to remind anons to go back to what I said about the weapons of the Antelope clan warriors, as in take a look at the bronze Plaque from Hell about weapons number 5 & 6 and how both were used by the Antelope and Wolf Clan alike. The “water” mentioned might be related to the ThunderBird’s stolen ability by the Horned Serpents to make storms and rain. It’s just a possibility.

“In ancient times, Arabia shared the gods of Mesopotamia, being so close to Babylon, except the genders and symbols of these deities were later swapped around. For instance, the sun god Shamash became the sun goddess Shams, and in southern Arabia Ishtar became the male storm god Athtar. Athtar was a god of the thunderstorm, dispensing natural irrigation in the form of rain. Athtar also represented fertility and water as essential to fertility. When representing water he stood not just for the act of raining itself, but rather for the useful flow of the water after the rain, in the wadi, the Arabian watercourse which is dry except in the rainy season.

[…]”

>> They are admitting themselves here that a mutation occurred, also explaining how the cult came from Mesopotamia to Arabia. As for the Antelope warrior handling lightning; well, we know the coup plotters stole the military technology of the other clan and merged it to theirs. But there is also the possibility that the “lance” both the Wolf and the Antelope warriors yielded used to emit electricity, just like the one the ThunderBirds had, or something very close to it, maybe fire possibly.

“Origins and development

Inanna has posed a problem for many scholars of ancient Sumer due to the fact that her sphere of power contained more distinct and contradictory aspects than that of any other deity. Two major theories regarding her origins have been proposed. The first explanation holds that Inanna is the result of a syncretism between several previously unrelated Sumerian deities with totally different domains. The second explanation holds that Inanna was originally a Semitic deity who entered the Sumerian pantheon after it was already fully structured, and who took on all the roles that had not yet been assigned to other deities.”

>> I think both theories are wrong. I think Inanna is the Evil Lady. She first settled in the Taurus mountain range then went down to Syria and Mesopotamia. She was known in different names depending on which aspect of her was worshiped as a deity. I have a starting point and I have an ending point; as in I know she settled first in the Taurus mountain range first, followed by a gap (a missing puzzle piece), then she showed up as Inanna in the East and Ishtar in the West.

• Page 1 232 –

>>14395586

(Please read from the start)

I also have female deities with identical characteristics in Northern Syria (around the border with Turkey) and in Israel + Jordan. In page 983, (((they))) wrongfully associated Baalat of Gebal/Isis/Hathor with Anat which is another aspect of Inanna. This was incorrect in that page and it’s still incorrect now. I’m highlighting it’s incorrect.

The goddess depicted in the artifacts of that page is of a “sexualized” mysterious goddess. Apparently, still unidentified. Can anons guess whom it is we have here? = it’s the Evil Lady = Inanna/Lilith. This is not Neith/Isis/Hathor/Baalat of Gebal, This is false and misleading from whomever put that information out. So dear reader, before jumping in haste to accuse the Phoenicians of practicing sexual perversions, remember it was a practice spread worldwide, and even the Israelites practiced it. But shhh!!!! We shouldn’t say that because it will ruin the good reputation and the good image of the Jewish people.

“As early as the Uruk period (c. 4000 – c. 3100 BC), Inanna was already associated with the city of Uruk. During this period, the symbol of a ring-headed doorpost was closely associated with Inanna. The famous Uruk Vase (found in a deposit of cult objects of the Uruk III period) depicts a row of naked men carrying various objects, including bowls, vessels, and baskets of farm products, and bringing sheep and goats to a female figure facing the ruler. The female stands in front of Inanna's symbol of the two twisted reeds of the doorpost, while the male figure holds a box and stack of bowls, the later cuneiform sign signifying the En, or high priest of the temple.”

>> I’m not satisfied with the explanation given about this vase. I’m going to take a look at this vase anons, it’s important, so a little detour is in order: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warka_Vase

“The Warka Vase or Uruk vase is a slim carved alabaster vessel found in the temple complex of the Sumerian goddess Inanna in the ruins of the ancient city of Uruk, located in the modern Al Muthanna Governorate, in southern Iraq. Like the Uruk Trough and the Narmer Palette from Egypt, it is one of the earliest surviving works of narrative relief sculpture, dated to c. 3200–3000 BC. Simple relief sculpture is also known from much earlier periods, from the site of Göbekli Tepe, dating to circa 9000 BC.”

>> Let me translate that for anons: This vase is as important for the Bloodlines as the Palette of Narmer is. Do anons remember how mysterious the circumstances of finding the Palette was and that there were no “clear” records of how and mostly where it was excavated?

And then, look at the beauty of the last sentence: they are saying there is similarity between the sculptures of Gobekli Tepe and the ones from the Vase, despite around 5000 years of difference chronologically between the 2 sites. So somehow around these 5000 years (approximately), the artistic style from Gobekli Tepe managed to reach Uruk, where the vase was found.

• Page 1 233 –

>>14395594

(Please read from the start)

If anons can take a look at the map I’m attaching with this page, we can see the location of Gobekli Tepe site. Amazing how close it is to the Syrian/Turkish border. Amazing how it’s close = as in walking distance to the Euphrates, just a bit before it enters Syria. Amazing how this region, mostly upper Syria = around the border, it’s where the mysterious Upper Syrian goddess cult existed. Amazing how this region is located within the Taurus mountain range. Amazing how it’s easy to navigate from the location of Gobekli Tepe to downstream Uruk.

Don’t get me wrong anons, I’m not saying the Evil Lady settled in Gobekli Tepe. I’m saying she settled in the area. Don’t go thinking Gobekli Tepe is the only ancient settlement of its kind. This is an ancient Tell and I’m sure there are plenty of such ancient settlements turned into Tells all along the Euphrates since the survivors kept on moving downstream as the flood water receded. Remember how I keep on repeating that the Euphrates is a chronological SPINE. Again, I’m certain there is more than one Tell in the area = in the Taurus mountain range. Is Gobekli Tepe a possibility of where the Evil Lady settled? = yes. Is Gobekli Tepe where the Evil Lady settled for SURE? = no. It’s just a possibility = one of many options. We haven’t been told where the other sites = Tells are and if they have been excavated. The Turkish gvt is very secretive as to what they are doing in the area. Amazingly, it’s also the geographic area where the Mitanni then the Hittite kingdoms/Empires existed. Truly amazing! Just one coincidence after the other. It’s just a pile of circumstantial evidence I’ve got on my hands. I hope anons also noticed the possibility of the Evil Lady living for thousands of years = extremely long life span.

I don’t know how Ishtar and Inanna are connected but it’s true that both deities share the same characteristics. I’m uncertain, but maybe the connection lies within them belonging to the same clan = the Antelope clan. This is what it looks like so far anyway. I’m just saying there is a missing link, a missing piece of the puzzle connecting the 2 deities together directly. I have 2 out of 3 pieces and I’m missing the middle one connecting all 3 together. I didn’t look into Ishtar, simply because I know she is of later date. I’m more interested in the older aspects of this Evil Lady because it’s closer to the origin.

Anons might ask: if the Evil Lady and her warriors were mostly settled in the Taurus mountain range, then stayed some time in Mesopotamia, then how come we find Antelope clan warriors in Ancient Egypt? There are 3 possibilities:

1 – Not all Antelope warriors joined the Evil Lady, some (probably a minority) were still loyal to the King of kings.

2 – Some Antelope warriors went to Ancient Egypt as spies.

3 – They were scattered worldwide in different location due to the Cataclysm that occurred. I know this sentence doesn’t make much sense to anons right now, but it will later on in this thread as I progress. I will be explaining how it all happened as I progress and gather more puzzle pieces. I think this is the correct possibility explaining how we got Antelope warriors in Ancient Egypt. Remember the 2 dogs palette and the battle depicted on it? I’ve already explained this palette to anons back in page 1 158.

• Page 1 234 –

>>14395605

(Please read from the start)

“The bottom register displays naturalistic components of life, including water and plants, such as date palm, barley, and wheat. On the upper portion of the lowest register, alternating rams and ewes march in a single file. The middle register conveys naked men carrying baskets of foodstuffs symbolizing offerings. Lastly, the top register depicts the goddess Inanna accepting a votive offer. Inanna stands at the front portion of the gate surrounded by her richly filled shrine and storehouse (identifiable by two reed door poles with dangling banners). This scene may illustrate a reproduction of the ritual marriage between the goddess and Dumunzi, her consort that ensures Uruk's continued vitality. The vase depicts an example of hierarchy being a portion of nature, and, according to anthropologist Susan Pollock, shows that social and natural hierarchies were most likely akin to each other in ancient Mesopotamia.”

>> Correct description given to the lowest register whom is divided into 2 sub-registers = levels. Correct description as well for the middle register. The description giving to the top register is somewhat correct: the ceremonial offering is correct, as well as the warehouse with the offerings in it. What I’m scratching my head about are the “poles”: are these really poles or are they something else? Could they be some type of Djed like poles? Or are they something similar to the Sharur weapon? Or are these Flag/heraldic symbol poles? I’m unsure of it. There also seem to be something on top of Inanna’s head, but since that part is damaged, it’s unclear what it is.

The interpretation given that this is a reproduction of the ritual marriage between the goddess and Dumunzi, her consort that ensures Uruk's continued vitality: well, I don’t agree to that. And why Inanna seem to be putting her thumb finger either on her lips or inside her mouth? This is symbolic and it has a meaning. The more I look at this, the more I wonder if this is not the origin of where the Illuminati “vow of silence” comes from = if this depiction of Inanna is not the starting point of this “vow of silence”. See pictures attached with this page.

“Discovery

The vase was discovered as a collection of fragments by German Assyriologists in their sixth excavation season at Uruk in 1933/1934. The find was recorded as find number W14873 in the expedition's field book under an entry dated 2 January 1934, which read "Großes Gefäß aus Alabaster, ca. 96 cm hoch mit Flachrelief" ("large container of alabaster, circa 96 cm high with flat-reliefs"). The vase, which showed signs of being repaired in antiquity, stood 3 feet, ¼ inches (1 m) tall. Other sources cite it as having been a slightly taller 106 cm, with an upper diameter of 36 cm. It is named after the modern village of Warka – known as Uruk to the ancient Sumerians. A plaster cast was made of the original and this reproduction stood for many decades in room 5 of the Near-Eastern Museum in Berlin (Vorderasiatisches Museum Berlin), Germany.”

>> I have a question: which one do you think is the original and which one is the reproduction? The one at the German Museum or the one if the Iraqi Museum? This vase seems to be of HIGH IMPORTANCE for the Bloodlines; so you think (((they))) returned the original one to the Iraqis?

“Decoration

The vase has four registers – or tiers – of carving. The bottom register depicts the vegetation in the Tigris and Euphrates delta, such as the natural reeds and cultivated grain. Above this vegetation is a procession of animals, such as ram and sheep presented in a strict profile view. The procession continues in the second register with nude males carrying bowls and jars of sacrificial elements, such as fruit and grain. The top register is a full scene, rather than a continuous pattern. In this register, the procession ends at the temple area. Inanna, one of the chief goddesses of Mesopotamia and later known as Ishtar in the Akkadian pantheon, stands, signified by two bundles of reeds behind her. She is being offered a bowl of fruit and grain by a nude figure. A figure in ceremonial clothing – presumably a chieftain/priest – stands nearby with the procession approaching him from behind.”

>> Correct description.

• Page 1 235 –

>>14395618

(Please read from the start)

“Theft and restoration

The Warka Vase was one of the thousands of artifacts which were looted from the National Museum of Iraq during the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. In April 2003 it was forcibly wrenched from the case where it was mounted, snapping at the base (the foot of the vase remaining attached to the base of the smashed display case.”

>> Whom invaded Iraq in 2003? What are the odds this vase was targeted on purpose; as well as similar “interesting” artifacts in Iraq? Which vase do you think was “damaged”: the real one of the replica? Where is the real one? Whom are the collectors?

“The vase was later returned during an amnesty to the Iraq Museum on 12 June 2003 by three unidentified men in their early twenties, driving a red Toyota vehicle. As reported by a correspondent for The Times newspaper,

As they struggled to lift a large object wrapped in a blanket out of the boot, the American guards on the gate raised their weapons. For a moment, a priceless 5,000-year-old vase thought to have been lost in looting after the fall of Baghdad seemed about to meet its end. But one of the men peeled back the blanket to reveal carved alabaster pieces that were clearly something extraordinary. Three feet high and weighing 600lb intact, this was the Sacred Vase of Warka, regarded by experts as one of the most precious of all the treasures taken during looting that shocked the world in the chaos following the fall of Baghdad. Broken in antiquity and stuck together, it was once again in pieces.

Soon after the vase's return, broken into 14 pieces, it was announced that the vase would be restored. A pair of comparison photographs, released by the Oriental Institute, Chicago, showed significant damage (as of the day of return, 12 June 2003) to the top and bottom of the vessel.

The fully restored Warka Vase (museum number IM19606) is now on display in the Iraq Museum.”

>> Look at the James Bond like story of returning the damaged Vase. Red car and the details of it all, make it sound like a Bond movie, doesn’t it? But amazingly, no one was arrested, no one was interrogated, no results of investigation (if it took place) and no one was held responsible. We don’t even know how the “important sacred” vase ended up in the hands of these 3 men and whom they are. I’m asking again: which one do you think is the authentic vase and which one do you think it’s the replica? Do (((they))) return an artifact (((they))) took? To WHOM is this vase so important and sacred?

I’m done with the vase. Now anons understand what it’s all about. Let’s go back to Inanna.

• Page 1 236 –