>>14297492

(Please read from the start)

“Mesopotamian mythology

The spirit in the tree in the Gilgamesh cycle

Samuel Noah Kramer (1932, published 1938) translated ki-sikil-lil-la-ke as Lilith in "Tablet XII" of the Epic of Gilgamesh dated c. 600 BC. "Tablet XII" is not part of the Epic of Gilgamesh, but is a later Assyrian Akkadian translation of the latter part of the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh. The ki-sikil-lil-la-ke is associated with a serpent and a zu bird. In Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Netherworld, a huluppu tree grows in Inanna's garden in Uruk, whose wood she plans to use to build a new throne. After ten years of growth, she comes to harvest it and finds a serpent living at its base, a Zu bird raising young in its crown, and that a ki-sikil-lil-la-ke made a house in its trunk. Gilgamesh is said to have killed the snake, and then the zu bird flew away to the mountains with its young, while the ki-sikil-lil-la-ke fearfully destroys its house and runs for the forest. Identification of ki-sikil-lil-la-ke as Lilith is stated in Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible (1999). According to a new source from late antiquity, Lilith appears in a Mandaic magic story where she is considered to represent the branches of a tree with other demonic figures that form other parts of the tree, though this may also include multiple "Liliths".”

>> I do not remember where, but I did mention before that the intention of Inanna to carve a new throne might be hinting to the COUP. So the Serpent in this story was killed by Gilgamesh, it fits with my idea that the Evil One was killed sometime, somewhere after he murdered the King of kings. We’ve also seen this in the movie Beautiful Creatures when Lena sees the sad love story of her ancestor Genevieve, when her “beloved” Ethan was killed and she became cursed to “save” him = bring him back to life. Same idea in Legend (1985), when Darkness is killed but he retains his spiritual form. I bet if I look more deeply into it, I will find this idea in many Hollywood movies. I mean it’s looking more and more than the Evil One was killed sometime after the death of the King of king. In the end, Evil doesn’t pay.

It’s not that clear but the Zu bird seems to be special and it flew away with its young towards a mountains. The easiest and fastest way to reach some mountains is to go upstream Euphrates via rowing and reach the South-Eastern Taurus mountain chain. It’s quicker and easier to get there, then to join a caravan towards the West where the other mountain ranges are = Mount-Lebanon & Anti-Lebanon. If they go to the West, it would take them at least a couple of weeks if not more to reach the mountains, but if they go rowing upstream Euphrates, they will reach it within a few short days.

From the sound of it, it seems the Zu bird and its young are fleeing. When you are running away = fleeing, you take the shortest road to safety, not the longest and most hazardous one. This is why I’m saying they went upstream Euphrates and sought refuge in the South-Eastern Taurus mountain range.

Multiple Lilith seems to refer to multiple demons or should I say multiple multi-morphs. It’s understandable how such armors = the multi-morphs, might look like demons to normal humans since they are made of a mixture of animals = the heraldic animals of the other clans. I bet if I ran into one, for real, I would also think it’s a demon or a monster.

I’ve been also wondering if Inanna isn’t the Evil Lady. Lilith might be her descriptive but it’s not her name for sure. And we know that Inanna has other names and she is very sexualized, lustful lady. She fits well with the descriptive of the Evil Lady.

• Page 1 182 –

>>14299499

(Please read from the start)

“Suggested translations for the Tablet XII spirit in the tree include ki-sikil as "sacred place", lil as "spirit", and lil-la-ke as "water spirit",but also simply "owl", given that the lil is building a home in the trunk of the tree.

A connection between the Gilgamesh ki-sikil-lil-la-ke and the Jewish Lilith was rejected by Dietrich Opitz (1932) and rejected on textual grounds by Sergio Ribichini (1978).”

>> These 2 can reject it all they want, it won’t change the fact that the survivors of the Flood came down to Mesopotamia from the Ark on Mt Ararat. So yes, there is a connection between Gilgamesh and Lilith because the survivors came from the same Ark as in the good warriors and the bad warriors survived by boarding the Ark along with the Evil Lady. And it is confirmed when it is said that Atra-Hasis put his family to safety first. Another confirmation is the presence = existence of the current days Bloodlines. They had to come from somewhere, (((they))) survived the Flood just like the warriors of Light did.

“The bird-footed woman in the Burney Relief

Kramer's translation of the Gilgamesh fragment was used by Henri Frankfort (1937) and Emil Kraeling (1937) to support identification of a woman with wings and bird-feet in the disputed Burney Relief as related to Lilith. Frankfort and Kraeling incorrectly identified the figure in the relief with Lilith, based on a misreading of an outdated translation of the Epic of Gilgamesh. Modern research has identified the figure as one of the main goddesses of the Mesopotamian pantheons, most probably Inanna or Ereshkigal.”

>> I think they are fighting over a nothing here. All 3 = Lilith, Inanna and possibly Ereshkigal point to the same lady. I think the first 2 actually do but I’m not so sure about Ereskhkigal.

I think here, with Lilith/Inanna we are dealing with the same situation as we have with Neith/Isis/Hathor/Baalat of Gebal in Ancient Egypt. This is the same person, but seen under different optics and with each new generation the misunderstanding just grows as young generations get further away from the truth and misinterpret the real meaning = mutation occurs, and with the migration of people along the centuries, the mutation gets bigger.

As for the tablet itself: well, first of all this is from Babylonian times, so it’s from later period. Here is the link for those whom are interested: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burney_Relief

• Page 1 183 –

>>14299577

(Please read from the start)

Yes, we’ve seen it before in this thread in page 766. First of all this was displayed at the B.M. and the exact location where it was found is unknown = as in just like for the palette of Narmer, we don’t know the exact location where this relief was excavated; you can bet this is done on purpose. (((They))) know all about it, but (((they))) are not sharing the information with us about it.

Sometimes, I think it’s because of this specific relief that we have the “owl” worship/symbolism by the Bloodlines. Let me explain: what I think happened is that even the descendants of the old coup plotters = the Bloodlines (from centuries till now) didn’t fully understand the real meaning behind the artifacts (((they))) had in (((their))) possession. When (((they))) saw this relief (((they))) immediately recognized whom the “sexy” lady is on it, but (((they))) rushed into thinking the “owls” are her symbol not knowing the military technology theft that took place back then and how the coup plotters merged it with their own armors.

The Evil couple along with their respective armies were never airborne = they were never part of the sky troops but they were part of the land troops. Their original armors never had wings like it’s proven by the bronze Plaque of the Hells of Lamashtu. The wings are stolen and added. Do you also see the horned crown she is wearing? This is also stolen tech from the other clans. And we know the Shenu Ring she is holding is some type of weapon. Is she a Traitor ThunderBird warrior? Or is she an Antelope warrior? It doesn’t matter because in each case it means she is part of the evil warriors.

The real tricky part is the two owls on each side of her along with the 2 Lions she is standing on. There are 3 interpretation tunnels here for those animals.

1 – The owls are Traitor ThunderBird warriors and the Lions are Traitor Feline warriors; both serving her as protectors, guardians or servants. I’m unable to see the ThunderBirds as traitors anons. They were the most fierce fighters against the Horned Serpents. This interpretation is incorrect.

2 – This Antelope warrior nude lady was a prisoner of the ThunderBirds, captured by them and they are her prison guards. But this doesn’t explain why she is standing in a superior stance on the Feline warriors, while holding the Shenu Rings. If you are a prisoner, you won’t be given any weapons. Right the opposite; you will be stripped of weapons and the military armor. So this interpretation is also incorrect.

3 – What will happen if I combine the ThunderBirds and the Feline warriors? = I will have the Griffin, right? The Griffin symbolizes royalty = the presence of a royal and this is what this relief is indicating. It’s pointing that the lady is of royal lineage, not just any royal lineage, but the Atlantean royal lineage. The reason why she is standing on the Lions is because they are the symbolic representation of a country = land = kingdom. What I’m saying is that the Griffin’s a composite of ONE ThunderBird and ONE Feline warrior. Combined, it represents the royal family of Atlantis.

• Page 1 184 –