>>14395624

(Please read from the start)

“Seal impressions from the Jemdet Nasr period (c. 3100 – c. 2900 BC) show a fixed sequence of symbols representing various cities, including those of Ur, Larsa, Zabalam, Urum, Arina, and probably Kesh. This list probably reflects the report of contributions to Inanna at Uruk from cities supporting her cult. A large number of similar seals have been discovered from phase I of the Early Dynastic period (c. 2900 – c. 2350 BC) at Ur, in a slightly different order, combined with the rosette symbol of Inanna. These seals were used to lock storerooms to preserve materials set aside for her cult.”

>> The rosette is NOT the symbol of Inanna. She, along with the other Sebetti, could open the portal, since they are the heavenly rulers. We also know for certain the rosette is not EXCLUSIVELY Inanna’s because we’ve seen it many times on various pre-dynastic Ancient Egyptian artifacts, including Narmer’s Palette (starting page 122), the Maceheads (starting page 811) and the Gebel Tarif knife handle (page 815). We also know the rosette mutated and transformed to take its final form as the Caduceus (page 769).

“Various inscriptions in the name of Inanna are known, such as a bead in the name of King Aga of Kish circa 2600 BC, or a tablet by King Lugal-kisalsi circa 2400 BC:

"For An, king of all the lands, and for Inanna, his mistress, Lugal-kisalsi, king of Kish, built the wall of the courtyard."

— Inscription of Lugal-kisalsi.

During the Akkadian period (c. 2334 – 2154 BC), following the conquests of Sargon of Akkad, Inanna and originally independent Ishtar became so extensively syncretized that they became regarded as effectively the same. The Akkadian poet Enheduanna, the daughter of Sargon, wrote numerous hymns to Inanna, identifying her with Ishtar. Sargon himself proclaimed Inanna and An as the sources of his authority. As a result of this, the popularity of Inanna/Ishtar's cult skyrocketed. Alfonso Archi, who was involved in early excavations of Ebla, assumes Ishtar was originally a goddess venerated in the Euphrates valley, pointing out that an association between her and the desert poplar is attested in the most ancient texts from both Ebla and Mari. He considers her, a moon god (eg. Sin) and a sun deity of varying gender (Shamash/Shapash) to be the only deities shared between various early Semitic peoples of Mesopotamia and ancient Syria, who otherwise had different not necessarily overlapping pantheons.”

>> There is no confusion or overlapping. I think most if not all are members of the same Clan or they are different aspects of the same deity = the Evil Lady. I’m not that acquainted with Mesopotamian pantheon, I just know the basics, but I’m sure if I go into an in-depth study I will found deities with many aspects to them, just like it was the case with Neith in Ancient Egypt. As I’ve suggested before Ishtar could be pointing to the Antelope warriors whom have an overly large sexual appetite = very sexualized. It maybe have been used as Lilith was to name one person and in the same time to indicate /point to demons = a double meaning word. It’s possible this is how Ishtar started = as a double meaning word but with time it evolved into being the name of a FEMALE sexual addict deity. It’s just a theory from my part. This needs further digging and investigation as I didn’t look too deep into it.

• Page 1 237 –

>>14405247

(Please read from the start)

“Worship

During the Pre-Sargonic era, the cult of Inanna was rather limited, but, after the reign of Sargon, she quickly became one of the most widely venerated deities in the Sumerian pantheon. She had temples in Nippur, Lagash, Shuruppak, Zabalam, and Ur, but her main cult center was the Eanna temple in Uruk, whose name means "House of Heaven" (Sumerian: e2-anna; Cuneiform: E2.AN). The original patron deity of this fourth-millennium BC city was probably An. After its dedication to Inanna, the temple seems to have housed priestesses of the goddess. During later times, while her cult in Uruk continued to flourish, Ishtar also became particularly worshipped in the Upper Mesopotamian kingdom of Assyria (modern northern Iraq, northeast Syria and southeast Turkey), especially in the cities of Nineveh, Aššur and Arbela (modern Erbil). During the reign of the Assyrian king Assurbanipal, Ishtar rose to become the most important and widely venerated deity in the Assyrian pantheon, surpassing even the Assyrian national god Ashur.”

>> What are the odds Sargon was a descendant of either the Evil Couple or one of the main coup plotters? I’m only indicating this is possible, I didn’t verify it myself. I’m saying the following out of memory, so forgive me if I got it wrong, but I think Naram-Sin was the grandson = descendant of Sargon. This explains his helmet = Antelope clan heraldic symbol (page 63). It CAN (=possibility) also explain why Jacques de Morgan was sooooo interested in the Stele of Naram-Sin.

Another clue that Sargon and Naram-Sin might have been direct descendants of the Evil Lady or at least of the Antelope Clan warriors is the SIZE of Naram-Sin as depicted on his Stele. The Sebetti rulers and their warriors were BIG in size = they are the giants researchers are looking into for so long.

I want to explain something to anons: the possibity of Sargon being a descendant of the Evil Couple is uncertain and even if it was the case, it doesn’t mean Mesopotamia was (((their))) territory. Let me explain:

First of all, I have no idea how many children the Evil Couple had. As in exactly how many kids the Evil One had with the Evil Lady. Sometimes, it shows it’s one and sometimes it shows it’s two. Could it be more than 2? I have no idea. But I do know 3 facts for sure:

A – Together, the Evil Couple had at least one direct descendant. We know for sure, the Evil Couple had AT LEAST ONE CHILD born from both of them together = as in a pure blood from both parents. We’ve seen a projection of this in the statue of Raziel (pages 1 127 – 1 128) from the movie Mortal Instruments: City of Bones. We don’t know WHERE this child of the Evil Couple was born?

B – The Evil One genetic illness didn’t allow him to have children easily and if they were born, these children didn’t live for long; as was the case with Albert Pike and Henry VIII = sickness of the kings.

C – The Evil One died at some point after he murdered the King of kings and tried to take the throne = so I don’t know how much time he had on his hands to have descendants.

• Page 1 238 –

>>14405268

(Please read from the start)

This is going to be a messy explanation from me.

From what I said a few pages ago about Inanna/Lilith/the Evil Lady have settled in first in the Taurus mountain range when the flood water level was high. As the waters receded, she along with her clan, went downstream Euphrates and settled in Mesopotamia. After that, she confrontated Neith at some point in time. So the question is: where was the child of the Evil Couple born? Was it in the Taurus mountain range? Was it in Mesopotamia? Or was on the Armenian Highlands just after coming out of the Ark?

To solve the where, we must find the when. I have no idea how long a Sebetti queen stays pregnant. For normal human females, it takes 9 month for the baby to form: since conception till birth. Were the Sebetti the same? Well, one thing for sure, we normal humans are very close to them biologically; apart the Sebetti have very enhanced genes, superior to ours. But I think their “normal” biological functions were very similar to ours as in they slept, they ate etc. So when it comes to pregnancy, I think they were very close to us as well.

Based on this, I can say the child of the Evil Couple was born around 9 months, give or take a few months, after he was conceived by the Evil Duo. We know the coup started with the murder of the King of kings. Then the Evil One, after consuming the flesh of the King, tried to take the throne and some type of military confrontation took place. Then something happened ,the Cataclysm started and the Evil One died (possible sequence of events in page 1 228). Somewhere, sometime along the line that child was conceived as the coup was plotted and executed. Or…..there is another possibility of him being conceived and reared in a secret way before this series of events = way before the murder of the King. And by the time the murder happened, the child was already walking and talking; but living in secret because the union = marriage of the Evil Couple was not “accepted”. I mean there is a possibility the Evil Duo had a secret child together while they were living in Atlantis.

This child, had in turn children, post Cataclysm of course. But where did he live? Did he live in the Taurus mountain range or in Mesopotamia? I don’t know. I also don’t know how many children he had because his father’s genetic illness was passed onto him; as in he couldn’t have easily children of his own.

We also have from reading about Inanna and Lilith information that the Evil Lady mated with “other men”, mostly likely after the death of the Evil One, as in post Cataclysm. How many children did she have from these men? Whom were the men she mated with after the death of the Evil One? Were they the lieutenants of the Evil One? Is Nergal one of them? What became of these children? Can we consider their blood purity as 50 % since they only came from the Evil Lady and not from the Evil Duo combined? This digging tunnel is insane in complexity and extremely hard, extreme extremely hard to figure out.

What is certain is that not all rulers of Mesopotamia were the descendants of the Evil Couple as in not all were bad, and not all were good. We just need to review the cases, one by one, for the rulers in specific and the dynasty they belonged to in general. We also got to take into consideration the possibility that some Mesopotamian rulers were puppets and/or weak and “powerful, hidden” people behind the curtain manipulated things.

• Page 1 239 –

>>14405288

(Please read from the start)

What I am certain of? = I’m certain that starting from the Akkadian era, it’s mostly noticeable at the end of it, there is a “fracture” = a chronological CUT. It’s as if the OLD generation passed away and the new one came and the mutation started there. That’s why I keep on telling anons to stop at the end of the Akkadian era when it comes to Mesopotamia. There is a clear line drawn there, dividing the phases between the old generation and the new one.

Another thing I’m certain of is that at least one DIRECT descendant of the Evil Couple stayed back in the Taurus mountain range and formed the Hittites empire. And Nefertiti was a Hittite princess whom married the Egyptian Pharaoh Amenophis IV = this is how the Blood of the Evil couple got directly into Ancient Egyptian Royal family. Did the blood of the Evil Couple exist in Ancient Egypt before the Hittite Empire existed? I don’t know, I haven’t checked it, but it’s highly possible because in old times they used to send princesses to marry into other royal families. So the chances are high like for example a Sumerian princess might have been sent to marry an Ancient Egyptian Pharaoh, bringing the Blood of the Evil Couple with her to Ancient Egypt. This is highly complex and we need to verify it all one by one, mostly with the high level of concubines ancient rulers had. This is highly complex. Untangling this is worth of a prize. So don’t jump dear reader into assuming all rulers in Ancient Egypt or Mesopotamia are good, or are bad. We simply don’t know which is which and we need to put them all under the microscope. This is highly complex.

When the Hittites kingdom collapsed, they migrated in many waves in different directions while some stayed and regrouped with other locals or became citizens to neighboring kingdoms in the Taurus mountain range. A huge mixing occurred. And with the migration of the Hittites, the blood of the Evil Couple got into Europe. Into Greece = Alexander the Great was one with that blood for example…and it got into the Franks, as in they are the direct descendants of the Hittites. Same goes for the Etruscans; if you take a Hittites pottery and an Etruscan pottery you are unable to spot the difference between them, mostly at the early production phase of the Etruscans.

From there on, it is easy to retrace the footsteps of the Bloodlines. These are the big chunks that I’ve managed to put together over the decades but I do have big gaps and blind spots as well which needed more work. So much to do.

“Individuals who went against the traditional gender binary were heavily involved in the cult of Inanna. During Sumerian times, a set of priests known as gala worked in Inanna's temples, where they performed elegies and lamentations. Men who became gala sometimes adopted female names and their songs were composed in the Sumerian eme-sal dialect, which, in literary texts, is normally reserved for the speech of female characters. Some Sumerian proverbs seem to suggest that gala had a reputation for engaging in anal sex with men. During the Akkadian Period, kurgarrū and assinnu were servants of Ishtar who dressed in female clothing and performed war dances in Ishtar's temples. Several Akkadian proverbs seem to suggest that they may have also had homosexual proclivities. Gwendolyn Leick, an anthropologist known for her writings on Mesopotamia, has compared these individuals to the contemporary Indian hijra. In one Akkadian hymn, Ishtar is described as transforming men into women.”

• Page 1 240 –