>>13720183 pb

then "we" (who in dafuq is "we" nao?)- were not paying attention very much.

All instances of 45 on the 747 after March 2nd 2020 were documented (and many can attest to it) as the tail # of the 747's 82-8000 or 92-9000

No instances of AF1 used as call sign since that date.

>sorry

I know you are

>>13720231

you obviously didn't read it as that it NOT wut it says

nice try though

>>13720256

>Pretty much the gist of it, yes.

Yeah no.

You still ain't comprehending it

have fun

>>13720281

you should probably learn to read

not your strongest trait at this point.

>>13720309

Key phrase

"may have been"

Not as you've already decided from your statement earlier

"dissolved on March 2nd"

Thanks for the comedy though

>>13720339

Sure of course you can't tell.

> Joe has never had AF1 as a call sign…not on the 747 and not on the 757.

Amateurs