>>13720914

repost from lb

Tracking covid injuries telegram acct, ck this story out -

https://t.me/covid_vaccine_injuries

https://t.me/c/1399970531/18310

[2nd link only works for members of this chat - mebbe coz they are getting attacked]

Did you know, that in Denmark we can't get operated it we had the jabs? The surgery won't operate because ot the 95% possibility of blood clots when operating.

blot clot danger highly plausible - has this been discussed elsewhere?

Did a short dig on blood clots and surgery:

Three main factors influence an individual’s chances of developing deep vein thrombosis after surgery:

1. hypercoagulability (an increase in the blood’s ability to clot)

1. endothelial injury (damage to the lining of blood vessels)

1. venous stasis (slowing of the blood flow in the veins).

with the covid jabs, you've got two out of three risk factors - maybe even all three

(and this is just about the risk of developing clots AFTER surgery - what is the risk of developing them DURING surgery?)

https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/covid-19-vaccine-janssen-ema-finds-possible-link-very-rare-cases-unusual-blood-clots-low-blood

DIG CALL

>>13720964

>media coverage on Gates positive until now

not really all that positive, ZH

hackers distrusted bill from the beginning coz he din share code, wanted cash for it

then their products got released too early, alpha versions sometimes

then microsoft millionaire thing went bust

then people found out what a crap company culture MS was

then microsoft monopoly called out

then bill began world savior mission but was anyone buying it even at the outset?

my personal gripe is common core advocacy

Totally disgusting - then he later admitted it failed

like he didn't know the disaster in the making beforehand

>>13721046

>comms is baking

because baker says "earlies"?

place better off if anons would just dig, meme, pray

but shills gonna shill, so….

>>13721096

were they already notabled in lb bred?

if not, this anon has no problem with it

if so, why notabled again?

there - anon has opined

KEK

>>13721120

New, original ideas also start out as opinions. The quality of the ideas is the test. But when i post my own analysis, i try to include links as well - like doing a lit review, so there's context. and some basis for the reader determining whether the opinion is worth considering.

>>13721188

Links may or may not be proof.

And if so, proof of what?

Who is generating the links?

whatdoesitmean.com is a link, kek.

in the end, always comes down to the quality of the ideas. but those who want quality usually have a broader understanding of the issues - and thus can link to multiple sources who have discussed the pros and cons previously.

>>13721188

>>13721213

>>13720957

this is an example of a dig done that is based on a combo of documented info and my own thoughts about the significance of that info - in this case, adding other sauce sweetens the deal

but sometimes, i have an idea that's pretty good which is original to me

and so do other anons

late night discussions can be quite illuminating