seconded
Baker's Choice.
If this Baker wants to be selective about the Notes he can.
Other Anons will back him.
This Baker likes for Anons to confirm whether or not something is Notable.
I don't see an issue with that unless you're newsbot or a kitchen fuckery type.
seconded
You just called Anons shills.
Congrats.
Nothing was wasted in that waste of a bread.
Besides, qresear.ch has any content from there.
Future searches will find it if need be.
Liar.
That's not how it went down at all.
And there are several Anons hopefully still here that can confirm.
F&G
COMPD LIST
Do not use.
The shills are trying to back door #17382 again.
What else did they fuck with in that list?
COMPD LIST
Do not use.
The shills are trying to back door #17382 again.
What else did they fuck with in that list?
TYB - just calling out fuckery when I see it o7
It's been rehashed over and over and you lose every time.
Better luck next time, shill.
Current Baker & the BVs have Anons' backs.
Comfy af right now.
If it's empty then it's empty.
Notables should have standards.
Otherwise it's nothing but Fuckery getting in there (see the reeeing about #17382 yet again this bread).
What's the point of having them when that happens?
That's worse than none at all.
Info does flow.
Everything posted here is available to search via qresear.ch.
Notables are recognition of good work/info from fellow Anons.
It's not a host for newsbot nor kitchen fuckery escapades.
Anons are taking back their Notables again.
Get used to it.
It's attacked so hard non-stop that the smart money is on your take.
I'm happy to do my small part fighting back at it as are some others.
Make fuckery have to at least earn it.
kek yeah if he thinks it's so hot shit then steal the diggs and post them here.
Chances are it's another Fake Q.
Way higher chances than substantive or "Q Helper" if you use past QResearch history as a guide.
Chase the laser tho that's your business.