Anonymous ID: 71249e May 22, 2021, 7:32 p.m. No.13731704   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1844

>>13731679

>Anon Opinion:

Clockfag not notable - post was just a general reminder - if more other Anons disagree then let it stay.

Check'em is Notable - but there were other Anon opinions just as worthy - should be a bun

New MajicEyesQnly - BINGO - that's what the shills want to have snuck in - ANons need to vote on that one

Anonymous ID: 71249e May 22, 2021, 7:53 p.m. No.13731831   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1896

>>13731814

>>13731815

NO.

This Baker made a call and involved Anons in those breads in the process.

If you think individual ones in that list got over looked then repost them.

Nothing is stopping you.

And if Baker AND Anons agree it's Notable then it's Notable.

Now gtfo with these lists you keep posting.

Anonymous ID: 71249e May 22, 2021, 8:31 p.m. No.13732088   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>13732063

Yes, and there are others that will take Notes but don't want to deal with bread tech shit.

If there aren't enough Anon Bakers then it may come to that: Breadmaker + Notetaker combos.

However, Anons are starting to Bake again so let's see what happens.

Anonymous ID: 71249e May 22, 2021, 8:38 p.m. No.13732138   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2162

>>13732100

Fair enough for Anons to give differing opinions on the matter, too.

I'm only really arguing back at the obvious is obvious shill maneuver to get MJ13 shit into the Notes this bread.

I have an opinion on how we should do it and it's similar to Current Baker's.

If you think otherwise then yeah so say, Anon.

Anonymous ID: 71249e May 22, 2021, 8:43 p.m. No.13732175   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>13732151

>i guess i will jsut have to pick up the am back and correct all this bs LIKE I HAVE TO DO EVERY FUCKING AMโ€ฆ

ATTN BV

Gerbil (most likely but whomever) is threatening Kitchen Fuckery again.

I'm capping this post for the morning.

Anonymous ID: 71249e May 22, 2021, 8:47 p.m. No.13732200   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>13732163

>I'll be keeping a closer eye on things this bread

TY BV

I differ from current Baker's hard stance of not Noting some of the called out Notables.

It's true none have been seconded but I don't think we need to go that far.

If he gives updates that's plenty of time for Anons to call out any bs they see or to second it by their silence.

Please help us nail this down better.