Hey faggot, do I have to find the post from yesterday when BV locked a thread, and took the bake away from a kike for deleting notables. I jokingly asked how long this rule has been around, and BV said it has always been the rule, it's just being enforced now?
That didn't last long, did it. Fucking BV retarded faggots. Do your fucking job or get the fuck out of the way and stop pretending to care.
>>13731775, >>13731782, >>13731793, >>13731797, >>13731807, >>13731839
Whatever faggot. You do whatever you want, you're in charge. Just wanna show anons that you're here to start shit, not to fix anything.
I asked why now. Guess you guys just wanted another board war like a few years ago when anons revolted against fapjack.
>I saw baker bake and not include notables from the previous baker because anons and himself decided that they didn't want to use them.
<Baker removed notables, and it's ok.
>The other BV removed that other baker because they clearly REMOVED previously established notables.
<Baker removed notables, and it's not ok.
I don't want to bake. Just pointing out inconsistency. You're in charge, fuhrer.
Fair enough. But when I'm told deleting notables is now going to result in locked bread and new baker, and then literally 2 days later a BV goes back and justifies it? Seems pretty gay.
I don't have the time to spend here anymore, and since it's almost all kike cooms nonsense, and basically no autist digs anymore (thanks to BV/BO not cracking down on this shit sooner), I just call shit as I see it.
Almost all of the notes are shill crap now. Or just some faggot article from some random "alt-news" website. The notables have basically turned into the front page of reddit.
Since almost all autists have been chased away by JIDF running everything and having cover run by BV/BO for years, how things get notabled (and what is notable) will necessarily have to change. It's up to anons to use discernment, and realize that any good digs will have to be done by themselves, because it's going to be rare to find it here.
Three years ago when a tons of anons were here and spirits were high? Sure, 3 noms, sauce, and debate was common. Now that there are basically only shills consensus cracking with bakers controlled by the shills? Good luck fighting that battle. Scatterend and uncoordinated "majority" anons vs a small and concerted minority working together? Everyone knows how that battle ends.
kek