https://t.me/covid_vaccine_injuries/3157

https://www.brighteon.com/a39081f7-59cd-415a-8233-f4a24b655b54

Dr. Lee Merritt and Mike Adams ask: Are covid spike proteins being RELEASED onto cities?

with Mike Adams

5-22-21

Dr M:

''' Self-replicating viruses are being researched by over 10 labs in US, including Darpa and Bill Gates

Dr M's patients seem to be having problems being around vaxxed people

Why?

Thinks there is "something going on" - vaxxes may be attacking non vaxxed persons

has found the self replicating viruses are already in production

"Transmissible vaccines whose applications vary thru time" - paper

This literature she found was all about animals - not humans

but MA wants to know, this about how to transmit covid to unvaxxed people?

Dr M:

immuno contraceptive viruses - they can be spread autonomously

replicant deficient viral vector - that's what they're using in J & J vax.

Everything we've seen can be explained wo/a whole virus

s-1 subunit of spike proteins - goes all over the body in mice, you don't need the whole virus [to cause symptoms?]

MA:

What about Salk Institute? Showed spike protein wo/vax is sufficient to cause vascular diseaese.

Dr M:

It's the spike protein that becomes the pathology. Unable to isolate Sars CovE 2. Only flu virus, cites Stanford study w/1500 samples.

What she thought originally:

LOOKED like a viral outbreak at first.

But then it "really fizzled" - became a seasonal viral outbreak like the flu (the pattern). It was just 3 cities that reported problems - Italy, Wuhan, NYC. ''Was it sprayed with spike protein?''

MA:

With molecular 3d level, could the spike protein be replicated and mounted on drones to be aerolized?

Dr M:

may not be needed, can be spread thru touch. [Cites examples.] Not casual contact, ongoing interactive contact.

Once they did it, they did it during the period of time when military was in Wuhan - another vector? May have piggybacked on the flu season combined with PCR test. Convinced everybody about the pandemic (even tho the flu cases were prolly responsible for many cases).

MA:

Why didn't we see the NYC pattern at cities all over the country? Talks about measles outbreak in Disney - he says he knows it was induced by the CDC. ~16mins.

Dr M:

• this brings up other rabbit hole.

Premise: we have emergent diseaeses coming out, must intervene. This started in the 1980s with aids and ebola. Was this due to a biological weapons program emerging then? Mentions Project Coast in S Africa - a program to infect African women so they would spread a virus so they became infertile and spread it to other women who would become infertile - black women. Notice how they fizzle out too - never really take off like you'd expect.

Mentions Ft Detrick and Fauci's connections there….

page 1

>>13732969

PCR test: cycle instructions way too high, to generate false positives at "every lab in the world."

MA:

PCR is "total quack science." [more] Brings up the issue again that this virus has NEVER BEEN ISOLATED.

Dr M:

Too many positive tests - means they knew….this vax could be targeting women and reproduction (can't verify yet).

[serious discussion between the two of the terrible corruption involved in current science: –"This is an attack on all of humanity about this."]

Why rectal swabs? If fecal-oral spread is the route, it's not crazy.

MA:

"It really is beyond insane at this point."

Now look at what's happened? They've gone after people setting vitamin D and saying it works. FDA wants to make it illegal - and have a prescription.

MA:

they're going after the supplements.

How doews the spike protein damage the ovaries and prevent reproduction?

Dr M:

ACE-2 pathway capability - gets the vax everywhere into the body, not just the nose.Reproductive organs have many of these pathways.Do these vaxxes cause infertility?

[more discussion about fake science - how bizarre things are]

India - villagers throw stones at vaccinators. When they use ivermectin, boom - virus is over.

Dr M thinks Big Pharma is going to lose. IG Farbin - current big pharma is the descendent of it. Bayer an offshot. Astrozenica. There are increasing calls for Nuremberg style prosecutions. Will it happen? Fauci is just the bag man - we should look behind him.

page 2

>>13732956

Interesting point.

Problem with bv's expressing opinions is that bv's have powers anons do not.

When BV/BO expresses an opinion as a BV, it's inherently a power play - espec if the BV demonstrates a willingness to ban posters whose opinions he dislikes

This goes for shills too - even shills have the right to express an opinion (imo, as long as they do not attack an anon relentlessly or spam - i would do a temporarily ban for abusive behaviors but not objectionable opinions)

>>13732963

so what do you think of the opinion above, BV?

>>13732990

this is a legit question, not a taunt

>>13732997

yes, anons took care of a lot of the smacking down

so did bakers, although most often when shills were whining about notables (either they wanted something in or out - skillful bakers would do a socratic dialog, e.g., "what's notable about it?") When the reply was fuck off, that was a shill, not an anon. Some who made waves were not shills and a good dialog followed.

>>13733005

You assume you always know who the shills are. In my experience, that is a mistake. And besides - shills can post too, can't they? What about freedom of speech?

SO

what exactly makes a shill's post objectionable?

What standard do you use to decide to ban someone?

>>13733005

post history is not sufficient - that's like banning someone accused of theivery for past thefts. Each case stands on its own - or it should.

Banning in a heavy hammer that is easily abused. Easy when it's CP or spam - but otherwise, requires discretion. A warning system with specific feedback for specific posts ensures that bans are actually warranted. And the process is transparent, so that everyone present can follow your line of thought.

>>13733035

>anyone blaming the Jews is a shill

probably so

but has it been established that blaming the jews is a bannable offense on this board?

Free speech is often ugly but is it bannable?

And who decides?

Anons could decide yes, it's bannable because it's against Q's promotion of tolerance. But would most anons agree or not?

If anti Jew stuff is spam, then that's different. But there hasn't even been a consistent policy on spam on this board, has there? Sometimes spam is tolerated (mostly), sometimes not.

>>13733047

and maybe i'm the man in the moon

who cares?

it's the argument that matters, not whoever makes it

>>13733065

for all his faults, FJ is not ban-happy

>>13733073

is someone wants to make a difference, then propose standards, ask anons to discuss them (and give real feedback), and try then to stay close to them as much as possible

staff and anons can discuss together

put it in dough somewhere where all can see

chaos and authoritiarianism go hand in hand, it's a pendulum swing

the q is: how do u get out of the vicious circle?

to get back in the middle requires reason and group collaboration

>>13733086

agree - a ban-happy BO is a disasteer

but BVs using bans to make the board more orderly - this may be well motivated but doesn't really work unless there are standards that make sense and which anons are aware of in advance.

like the law.

>>13733100

You can't stop shills from shilling.

QR has always had shills.

What really causes the problems - how posters respond to shilling.

Getting frustrated (etc) doesn't work.

Think it through:

What are they trying to do?

What tools are they using?

When to ignore, when to respond, when to take action (staff)?

I'd say ignore or respond (depending on the circumstance) 99% of the time

But not in frustration - doesn't work.

just my two cents, i care about this place, would like to see it less chaotic and more informative. More discussions, group digs, new ideas, problem solving.

>>13733136

shills = predators

patriots can defeat them

difficult on a board where comms are difficult and identities unknown, because those with id's - site owners, board owners, etc - will always have an advantage.

and will tell anons they must remain anon

pretty hard to take action as an group wo leaders or identifiable posters

would work if there were no opposition

but obviously, there IS - and it's got this place in deep shit

so what exactly went wrong?

and how do you put it right wo Q's intervention?

>>13733172

don't mean that anyone with an avatar type identity is a shill

do mean that successful shills usually use an identity to strut their stuff