>>13734472

almost 11 months, from my estimation.

but the Summer of 2020 is a prep, and then they didn't kick into super bitch mode till Labor day.

but it's been occupied, the breads and the board, since at least 1 July 2020, by my estimations.

Pig didn't show up till May of 2020.

something changed around then.

but the prayer shema shamers and the and trottle with lightening Shakti shamer showed up in Jan 2020, and they are still here.

the OSS psyop didn't start till July, though they'll say it was on a 'side bread' the whole time.

>>13734564

July 1, 2020: someone moved in and tried to chase away all the anon.

all the 'explaining' of what it is: may all just be made up.

Jan6: whoever was 'running' the crew were doing hard 'you all fail, fall and die' shilling.

all through december: marxists one, they will round you up now.

clearly not a MAGA team.

the place was occupied since at least July 1.

And yet they fail

>>13734578

so you're of the same mind as me: OSS was a made up character showed up in July or so, as if it had been around since January of last year?

that's my memory of it but these kinds of falsehoods are always designed to seem older than they really are.

for example without screen caps who ever picked up the Mr. Pig meme and turned it into a psyop will argue that they were here from the beginning.

but the oldest screen cap of a Mr. Pig is from May 30, 2020. And even though solicited for older ones: no older ones exist (has to be a bit older than the oldest known, so sometime a year ago, or so, it showed up).

And OSS / ge r bull / and all the rest (the prof and maryjane?) are part of a play that is performed 'punch-n-judy' style that runs like the animations in the Monty Python's Flying Circus had (as a seemingly unrelated constant nonsense animation).

Dimsdale . . .

>>13734624

I didn't say 'its all there'

you have me confused.

PS: notables have become almost worthless. I don't contribute to them.

PS: sometimes I do post stuff that makes notables, but that's not why I post it.

PS: you have me confused with the other poster.

>>13734653

yes, and we were both here then enduring it.

and we are here now, expecting Q to return and etc.

It's OK. I keep a lot of notes and I still don't know everything there is to know.

but I do know that CM is a warrior for just causes and he has my support in his efforts to unfraud the fraud.

just so people are clear about BV:

BV expressed some troubling opinions, as are BV's right.

and also BV is on a rampage of not putting up with the bullshit anymore.

Meanwhile maintaining a truculent attitude that, despite the uncharming baiting in a political way (about foriegn politics) . . .is effective not is cutting off the messages or real people, or teams of shills who don't flood (they are shills but they do still have free speech).

and even though BV is a bitch and sometimes plays it really mean: BV hasn't been just randomly banning. It's more like: if you IP hop and robot post nonsense that adds nothing and also defames, BV is there with the ban hammer.

I don't like it but that's what it is.

but at the same time what is it that I don't like?

that people robo post operational nonsense and it compels someone to overdue his truculence and put himself up to be scolded for daring to express anger and be a bitch to those who provoke for just that reason.

So in the height of battle is a warrior angry at his foe? Clearly the script shows it is so.

BV isn't just one person.

>>13734723

as I said: "I don't like it, but that's what it is"

so why should I fuck off when I merely describe that these bitches have provoked others to behave in a way that clearly some (you do) find questionable?

I'm describing the effect, not supporting the behavior.

>>13734739

perfection is a theory.

and yes, things happen by accident or not as to your behavior, but as to someone else's.

doesn't it say 'because proxiies share IPs' that the ban might not be intended for you?

it even tells you.

If a police officer tells me to leave the area because . . . (I don't need the because)

I leave.

did he get it wrong? perhaps.

he's on the job.

he's doing his job.

BV said it yesterday (there is more than one BV) that he didn't care if people were his friends here.

get it: this is a war zone. BV is a soldier.

(allagorically?)

clearly allagorically.

or perhaps literally.

use your noggen.