>>13734800

there isn't just one BV.

the rouses are played to make people think what they will.

the BV isn't your fren.

they make that clear.

they aren't banning content, tehy are banning methods.

it's not the same.

PS: whatever they think you hate they will pretend and troll it out that is what they are to see how you behave and how far you go with it.

BV is not your fren

there sin't just one BV.

they are banning methodologies, not ideologies.

if you use certain robotic badger methods, they will see it and ban it.

do they always get it right?

no.

do they do it maliciously?

they do it what they do.

and I describe it.

>>13734861

explain why it's comedy?

for example, in March someone (Hot Wheels) figured out a new way to spam the board and flooded it for days like that.

it was appropriate to figure out how to ban that method.

how is it funny?

it was suppression of free speech.

some say that is a civil rights violation.

people have to be able to comm.

the board flood didn't add any thing informationally. It was a temper tantrum.

it wasn't speech, it was a shit storm.

banning or blocking that is not appropriate?

discussing and commenting on it is 'capitulating' to ? ? ? censorship?

hardly. It's just called information security.

but you see it as 'total comedy?'

>>13734888

I must say I don't know for sure that it was Fred, and I thought I'd put a question mark there.

So Fred, sorry if it's not you who did that but eveyrone seemed to think it was at the time . . . and it did have your kind of slanderous nasty embedded in every image . . .

>>13735145

Thank you I'm saving this.

how can I do this for myself as I spend a lot of time doing screen captures and this is so succinct.

I remember 'baker tools' once but I never downloaded it . . .