>>13736488

the constant badger of 'gammar and spelling' is a psyop designed to put people out of stride and stifle the creative minds of those who are able to post copiously.

basic point: the only pepole who should be asking about spelling and grammar should be those who are confused and need things cleared up.

this is not a place where laws are written, nor do we provide instructions for process.

we are a free speech zone.

the grammar and seplling badgers are a pox and do not care about understanding anon.

they only want to trip them up.

>>13736508

constant badger psyop: it doesn't care about anything but just tob e an annoyance.

you are that.

>>13736527

i demonstrate what you are by allowing myself to be a target of your closed minded hazing and need to be the dialectical dominant.

you show yourself as a needy control freak and bring no ideas to the table.

all the criticism you give obviates your role as an annoyance. You loose your credibility, almost as if you have agreed to just be like an AI, without descernmint or love in your heart.

your breath will never have the peppermint clean thing going on.

no one will want to set a place for you

to sleep off your fearful kvetching-pox.

>>13736554

there is no anger, anon.

the fake is that you were confused by my poor typign or lack of concern for perfection in a first draft.

some of us don't live the fully funded agency lifestyle.

>>13736568

constant badger shills probably work off a list of insults. the 'operator' can probably switch the incounter into a 'badger till the end of bread' mode. It will produce terse putdowns that don't make sense within the context of actual speaker of the real languge. it will pretend to a lack of understanding for phrases that make perfect sense in the vernacular of th eposter. It will pretend it's making fun of Asians.

It will call you karen.

if you persist the real guy will come back and do one more attempt at shame scolding you about grammar or punctuation.

it never shames the ideas of those who are obvious and intentional bullies.

so it's inauthentic.

again: is somoene is confused they ask for clarity.

the bitchscold of the grammar-dillhole is not about them understanding you. It's about them trying to shame and be the dialectical dominant.

they always fail when they go on with it.

I obviate it by describing it in minutia.

>>13736603

descriptive antishill merely describes what it seems to be as a reasonable explanation.

the person doing it doesn't 'feel' anything.

they describe.