FYI - Broke the seal on the Baker Wars this bread.
>hurr durr QR2021 Anons suck
Or, you can follow-up on it now to try to get it corrected if you have the better sauce.
No need to be a Board Chick-Dude about it
I'm glad you brought it up, too.
Let's see what Baker says.
Why be a Debbie Downer about it until then?
I tell ya those drops just seep into one's vocabulary don't they?
Whoa slow down.
I said if you have better sauce that repudiates a Notable then by all means bring it up.
But sounding shilly (sounding not saying you are) about it isn't going to get you anywhere.
There's enough of that on here already and you'll just blend in.
I'm gonna get big mad now and say Not Notable when your Monty stuff comes up.
I'll get you sucker.
>>13736495
Q1970 - the one they don't like to mention.
Grammy ain't goin nowhere, Anon.
That's better than ignoring it all the time.
Complete picture for the win no matter the topic.
Come on, man.
It's all about being able to whip out Grammy on someone.
Nothing personal.
Don't be so uptight.
I don't ascribe too much into the natural sequence of Q's drops.
In terms of proving context.
Sometimes when he's answering questions directly or tagging an Anon out of the blue yeah I can maybe see it then.
But, just saying here's 3 Q's in a row that means this eh not so much.
This bread has been pretty light on Baker War skirmishes, huh?
Hang in there it might erupt again at any time.
Meanwhile Anons just doing their Sunday thing.