Frens, the Storm is here for the taking.
It is often fun to dive into new things, even if it can be scarry at the precipice… so why not try namefagging?
I've tried in four rather different ways to direct anons to a rather long dig… but no luck yet.
I'll work backwards in explaining.
Last night I posted this:
>>13732716 (pb)
It was an intentionally deceptive post.
I pretended to be a different anon from the anon I screencapped there.
But even thought I was critiquing the BV who is always looking at IP hashes, he didn't rebuke me.
Instead, just three posts down, he humblebragged that he is an Arch Linux guy.
An Arch Linux guy who saves memes by screenshotting them in Firefox… hmmm.
A few nights prior, I posted this
>>13707051 (pb)
I was replying to a poster using the old Socratic Q style… mostly.
An interesting post. Was it Q?
Maybe… but I took the chance and went for it, but no bites.
And not long before that:
>>13699864 (pb)
THAT particular graphic is responding to the fact that three "random" posts in the immediately prior bread recall scenes from the film Total Recall.
Two featured characters Q names, and my graphic title is meant to evoke the author of the original story.
(For me if there is ONE single author who best prefigures this whole thing… just sayin…)
But there is even more backstory there…
I was VERY attentively watching the prior bread, as I had a whole thing going where I was only posting BOTANY themed posts.
I started by replying to this post (NOT me) (maybe Q), which I saw and thought "maybe this is some Q BS goading me to reply but wtf its kinda what I do")"
>>13698898 (pb)
And then I got going with botany and stuck with it rigorously since I thought it might go somewhere.
And maybe it kinda did inasmuch as the cicadas eat the plants and make music there too.
And if you look closely, ALL THREE of those "attempts" try to direct you here:
>>13673354 (pb)
Now that post took MUCH longer to contrive.
And I think there is good stuff right there.
But even so it was meant to direct you to the 172 post dig starting here:
>>13593761 (pb)
But now that has fallen off the catalog, so you can't see the graphics.
I can repost them, but I will wait to see if some anons are prepared to dive in, absorb the material and forge it into weapons of their own.
Z
PS: It's almost as if someone tweeted a vid involving a sharp change of direction…