Wait… so thoughts were never groups of neurons sending signals to other neurons that makes up a thought? So our thoughts were all along made up of high frequency movements… of what?
Mapping of patterns can be used to "accurately predict" future action or thought based on decoding these mapped patterns?
What is brainwaves?
What is energy?
What is frequency?
What is vibration?
What is resonance?
What is a field?
I ask these questions because I want to lay out an understanding by the very simple definitions of these words you're putting together. What are by definition, these words above?
That's quite interesting.
NOW when it comes to consciousness,I am led to believe that there is more to it from current mainstream understanding. How did he lose 90 percent of his brain? Was he born like this? Did it happen slowly over time? How common is something like this?
Either way that's interesting
All of that you're saying is a type of elementary particle?
Okay, what makes up a Photon? What are it's "attributes?''
Photons carry a quantity called spin angular momentum that does not depend on its frequency. Because photons always move at the speed of light, the spin is best expressed in terms of the component measured along its direction of motion, its helicity, which must be either +n or −n. These two possible helicities, called right-handed and left-handed, correspond to the two possible circular polarization states of the photon.
The intrinsic properties of particles, such as charge, mass, and spin, are determined by this gauge symmetry.
But then again, what if the science behind control of the brain DO and CAN come from wireless "frequencies". Does that mean it can and does work in reverse? Vise versa?
TY anon. It's amazing how much clarity can be made when we all have an under standing of these words.
So I did a search with all of these words put together to see what stands out the most. From my results, Ive gotten a mixed bag of "established science", nicola tesla's 3 6 9, and new age stuff.
Now, before I say anything else, I DO believe there is something to this. Looking into the new age stuff, where it comes from what where it's at right now has roots from the Russian occultist Helena Petrovna Blavatsky from the mid 1800's. The girl who was to become the most famous occultist of the 19th century showed an early interest in magic and the supernatural. Magic and supernatural.
My question is, given the tangled web of the "new age" and "modern science", how much do we REALLY know? Are we yet to have a full understanding?
Just look at how mainstream history portrays him.
Why has the things he's established like "space-time" NOW get thrown into question? Could it be possible that he could have been a part (knowingly or unknowingly) of the [old guard] ie establishing something knowingly to be false in order to keep us from the actual truth of our reality?
One thing for sure is the truth of it all will be one day common knowledge to our grandchildren and beyond.
For me, right now, that are too many unknowns.
I know that I don't know that there may be unknowns that I don't know to know in the grand scheme of what there is to know to paint a proper picture.
I do like to absorb information from many sources, but I do so objectively and without attachment. One thing I do know though is that GOD IS REAL. God's story is unfolding in BIBLICAL proportions and it's GLORIOUS!
This bread is comfy right now.
Most shills are still clocked out, anons having deep discussions, it's just all around goodness.
Doesn't happen often, but when it does, it's a gift
Amongst fucking legends.